| Literature DB >> 31681516 |
Cuiying Li1, Xiaowei Li1, Jun Xiao1, Juan Liu1, Xiu Fan1, Fengyan Fan1, Huifen Lei1.
Abstract
In the Chinese Han population, prolonged exposure to hypoxic conditions can promote compensatory erythropoiesis which improves hypoxemia. However, Tibetans have developed unique phenotypes, such as downregulation of the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway through EPAS1 gene mutation, thus the mechanism of adaption of the Han population should be further studied. The results indicated that, under plateau hypoxic conditions, the plains population was able to acclimate rapidly to hypoxia through increasing EPAS1 mRNA expression and changing the hemoglobin conformation. Furthermore, the mutant genotype frequencies of the rs13419896, rs1868092 and rs4953354 loci in the EPAS1 gene were significantly higher in the Tibetan population than in the plains population. The EPAS1 gene expression level was lowest in the Han population carrying the A-A homozygous mutant of the rs13419896 locus but that it increased rapidly after these individuals entered the plateau. At this time, the hemoglobin content was lower in the homozygous mutant Han group than in the wild-type and heterozygous mutant populations, and the viscosity of blood was reduced in populations carrying the A-A haplotypes in rs13419896 and rs1868092 Among Tibetans, the group carrying homozygous mutations of the three SNPs also had lower hemoglobin concentrations than the wild-type. The Raman spectroscopy results showed that exposure of the Tibetan and Han population to hypoxic conditions changed the spatial conformation of hemoglobin and its binding ability to oxygen. The Tibetan population has mainly adapted to the plateau through genetic mutations, whereas some individuals adapt through changes in hemoglobin structure and function. ©2019 Li et al.Entities:
Keywords: EPAS1; Hemoglobin; Plateau; Raman spectroscopy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31681516 PMCID: PMC6822597 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
The baseline characteristics of each group.
| No. | Age | BMI | Smoking | Altitude (m) | First exposure? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plains | 190 | 24.12 ± 4.40 | 23.00 ± 1.12 | No | 500 | — |
| Han entered plateau 3rd day | 50 | 23.50 ± 4.42 | 23.07 ± 1.16 | No | 4200 | √ |
| Han entered plateau 7th day | 50 | 19.48 ± 1.25 | 22.29 ± 1.35 | No | 4,200 | √ |
| Han entered plateau 30th day | 44 | 22.70 ± 3.60 | 22.25 ± 1.50 | No | 3,700 | √ |
| The plateau Han population (living in plateau>10years) | 24 | 41.50 ± 7.60 | 22.63 ± 1.39 | No | 3,700 | — |
| Tibetan | 155 | 35.31 ± 15.53 | 23.16 ± 1.76 | No | 3,700 | √ |
Figure 1The differences of physiological indexes between Tibetan and Han ethnic groups in the plateau hypoxic environment.
(A) The hemoglobin level in different population. (B) The hemoglobin level in different population.*P < 0.05 or ***P < 0.001 for indicated group versus plain group. N .S: No statistical difference.
Three SNPs genotype and allele frequency distribution of EPAS1 gene in different populations.
| SNP | Genotype or alleleassociated with SNP | Native Tibetans (n%. | Plain group (n%, | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Genotype | G/G | 4 (2.6) | 83 (43.7) | 1 | |
| G/A | 35 (22.6) | 90 (47.4) | 0.124(0.042–0.364) | 0.000 | |
| A/A | 116 (74.8) | 17 (8.9) | 0.007 (0.002–0.022) | 0.000 | |
| Allele | G | 43 (13.9) | 256 (67.4) | 1 | |
| A | 267 (86.1) | 124 (32.6) | 0.078 (0.053–0.115) | 0.000 | |
|
| |||||
| Genotype | G/G | 12 (7.7) | 152 (80.0) | 1 | |
| G/A | 61 (39.4) | 37 (19.5) | 0.048 (0.023–0.098) | 0.000 | |
| A/A | 82 (52.9) | 1 (0.5) | 0.001 (0.000–0.008) | 0.000 | |
| Allele | G | 85 (27.4) | 341 (89.7) | 1 | |
| A | 225 (72.6) | 39 (10.3) | 0.043 (0.029–0.065) | 0.000 | |
|
| |||||
| Genotype | A/A | 18 (11.6) | 144 (75.8) | 1 | |
| G/A | 40 (25.8) | 44 (23.1) | 0.138 (0.072–0.264) | 0.000 | |
| G/G | 97 (62.6) | 2 (10.1) | 0.003 (0.001–0.011) | 0.000 | |
| Allele | A | 76(24.5) | 332 (87.4) | 1 | |
| G | 234 (75.5) | 48 (12.6) | 0.047 (0.032–0.070) | 0.000 |
Notes.
OR: Odds ratio, OR >1 indicates that this factor is a risk factor; OR value <1 indicates that this factor is a protective factor.
* means Heterozygous mutation or Homozygous mutation group compared with wild type group, P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Figure 2The differences in EPAS1 mRNA expression between the Tibetan and Han populations.
mRNA was extracted from peripheral blood in different group and reversed into cDNA, and RPL13A was used to calibrate sample loading. *P < 0.05 or ***P < 0.001 for indicated group versus plain group. N.S: No statistical difference.
Genotype of three SNPs within the EPAS1 gene and differences in Hb levels in different populations.
| Hb (g/L) SNP sites | Wild type | Heterozygous mutation | Homozygous mutation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain group |
| 151.2 ± 12.2 | 147.6 ± 12.0 | 149.1 ± 9.8 |
|
| 149.8 ± 12.3 | 147.5 ± 10.3 | 133.0 ± 0.0 | |
|
| 150.1 ± 11.2 | 148.0 ± 14.0 | 140.7 ± 12.4 | |
| Plateau (3 days) |
| 173.7 ± 12.9 | 171.6 ± 10.5 | 170.4 ± 5.3 |
|
| 172.6 ± 11.4 | 172.3 ± 10.1 | 164.0 | |
|
| 172.4 ± 10.1 | 172.3 ± 14.4 | 172.5 ± 12.0 | |
| Plateau (7 days) |
| 174.9 ± 9.4 | 174.3 ± 12.7 | 169.7 ± 10.4 |
|
| 170.5 ± 28.9 | 173.8 ± 10.7 | 150.0 | |
|
| 169.3 ± 30.1 | 175.8 ± 10.6 | 166.0 ± 22.6 | |
| Plateau (30 days) |
| 177.7 ± 10.9 | 175.7 ± 9.5 | 170.8 ± 11.7 |
|
| 177.7 ± 8.7 | 169.4 ± 14.8 | 165.0 | |
|
| 176.1 ± 7.4 | 175.9 ± 17.0 | 173.0 ± 11.3 | |
| Plateau (>10 years) |
| 174.5 ± 11.3 | 171.1 ± 18.8 | 158.2 ± 19.8 |
|
| 171.2 ± 16.3 | 171.3 ± 19.5 | 170.0 ± 6.0 | |
|
| 170.3 ± 16.1 | 169.4 ± 19.0 | 177.4 ± 11.0 | |
| Native Tibetans |
| 172.0 ± 16.8 | 158.9 ± 31.5 | 153.8 ± 27.7 |
|
| 189.7 ± 18.0 | 154.7 ± 29.4 | 150.1 ± 25.1 | |
|
| 160.7 ± 24.3 | 158.3 ± 32.1 | 152.9 ± 28.7 |
Genotype of three SNPs within the EPAS1 gene and differences in SpO2 value in different populations.
| SpO2 (%) SNP sites | Wild type | Heterozygous mutation | Homozygous mutation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain group |
| 97.30 ± 1.36 | 97.08 ± 1.60 | 99.11 ± 1.64 |
|
| 97.33 ± 1.37 | 97.00 ± 2.00 | 95.69 ± 3.56 | |
|
| 97.02 ± 1.53 | 97.92 ± 1.31 | 98.55 ± 1.41 | |
| Plateau (3 days) |
| 87.44 ± 3.37 | 87.81 ± 3.29 | 87.62 ± 1.60 |
|
| 87.85 ± 3.16 | 86.64 ± 2.84 | – | |
|
| 87.76 ± 3.05 | 87.15 ± 3.41 | – | |
| Plateau (30 days) |
| 90.40 ± 2.46 | 90.18 ± 2.96 | 91.81 ± 1.41 |
|
| 90.06 ± 2.62 | 91.86 ± 1.77 | – | |
|
| 90.31 ± 2.84 | 90.56 ± 1.24 | – | |
| Plateau (>10 years) |
| 88.75 ± 7.09 | 87.20 ± 5.45 | 92.30 ± 5.24 |
|
| 89.62 ± 5.37 | 80.04 ± 3.25 | 86.39 ± 4.12 | |
|
| 83.00 ± 4.24 | 93.00 ± 2.55 | 84.09 ± 3.46 | |
| Native Tibetans |
| 95.00 ± 1.23 | 94.15 ± 2.64 | 94.65 ± 2.30 |
|
| 94.33 ± 2.08 | 94.00 ± 2.04 | 94.97 ± 2.54 | |
|
| 96.00 ± 1.73 | 94.07 ± 2.46 | 94.60 ± 2.34 |
Figure 3Expression level of different genotypes in EPSA1 gene at Han plateau after Entering Plateau.
Stratified analysis based on different genotypes was used to analyze the expression levels of EPAS1 gene.
Figure 4Raman spectra of RBC in Tibetans and plain population.
Comparison of the spectra recorded for the different group (A) Han population before or after entering plateau and (B) Tibetan population using 514 nm laser excitation wavelengths, showing the major band assignments in the range of 500–2,000 cm−1.