| Literature DB >> 31681377 |
Rongrong Wan1,2, Peng Wang1,2, Xiaolong Wang1,2, Xin Yao3, Xue Dai1,2.
Abstract
Wetland biomass is an important indicator of wetland ecosystem health. In this study, four dominant vegetation communities (Carex cinerascens, Phalaris arundinacea, Artemisia selengensis, and Miscanthus sacchariflorus) in the Poyang Lake wetland from 2010 to 2016 were classified from Landsat images using spectral information divergence (SID). We combined aboveground biomass (AGB) field measurements and remote sensing data to establish a suitable model for estimating wetland AGB in Poyang Lake, which is on the Ramsar Convention's list of Wetlands of International Importance. The results showed that (1) overall, the classification accuracy for vegetation pixels across 5 years ranged from 59.1% to 73.7% and (2) the inter-annual and spatial variations in the AGB of the four vegetation types were clear. C. cinerascens had an average AGB density value of 1.28 kg m-2 in Poyang Lake from 2010 to 2016; M. sacchariflorus had the highest AGB density with an average value of 1.39 kg m-2; A. selengensis had almost the same level at 1.26 kg m-2; and P. arundinacea had the lowest AGB density at 0.64 kg m-2. This study provides useful experience for estimating carbon sequestration of vegetation in freshwater wetlands.Entities:
Keywords: Landsat image; Poyang Lake; Ramsar wetland; aboveground biomass; random forest; wetland vegetation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31681377 PMCID: PMC6807651 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
The timing of remote sensing of images used in this study.
| Time | Data Source | Time | Data Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2010 | Landsat 7 | Oct 21, 2013 | Landsat 8 |
| Oct 8, 2011 | Landsat 7 | Oct 24, 2014 | Landsat 8 |
| Oct 26, 2012 | Landsat 7 | Oct 11, 2015 | Landsat 8 |
| Dec 16, 2016 | Landsat 8 |
Figure 1Location of Poyang Lake and the distribution of field sampling sits in 2016. (A) Xingzi littoral land; (B) Ganjang river delta; (C) Sidu Island; (D) Dachahu sub-lake; (E) Dahuchi sub-lake.
The number of sample sites in every sample field in 2016.
| Sample field |
|
|
|
| Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A) Xingzi littoral land | 16 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 24 |
| (B) Ganjiang River delta | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 17 |
| (C) Sidu Island | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 |
| (D) Dachahu sub-lake | 27 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 43 |
| (E) Dahuchi sub-lake | 11 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 27 |
| Total | 64 | 21 | 17 | 21 | 123 |
The locations of sample fields are shown in .
Figure 2Spatial distribution of sample points for model validation in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014, and 2015.
Figure 3Flowchart used to map AGB in Poyang Lake using Landsat images.
Figure 4Distribution of the main four vegetation types (A) and area statistics (B) from 2010 to 2016.
Summary of producer’s accuracy for the four dominant vegetation communities of classification results based on field survey data in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014 and 2015.
| Land cover | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2014 | 2015 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOSP | PA(%) | NOSP | PA(%) | NOSP | PA(%) | NOSP | PA(%) | NOSP | PA(%) | |
|
| 7 | 71.4 | 3 | 100 | 7 | 57.1 | 10 | 60 | 18 | 72.2 |
|
| 5 | 60 | 4 | 75 | 5 | 80 | 2 | 50 | 16 | 56.3 |
|
| 3 | 33.3 | 8 | 50 | 4 | 50 | 6 | 50 | 11 | 63.6 |
|
| 4 | 75 | 9 | 66.7 | 4 | 75 | 4 | 75 | 12 | 66.7 |
| Total | 19 | 73.7 | 24 | 66.7 | 20 | 65 | 22 | 59.1 | 57 | 64.9 |
| NOSP refer to number of sampling points, PA refer to producer’s accuracy. | ||||||||||
Statistical characteristics of AGB of four vegetation communities of field sampling in 2016 December.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | 1.09 | 0.88 | 1.42 | 1.70 |
| SD | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.56 | 0.95 |
Figure 5Prediction accuracy of the RF model on training data set when mtry varies from 1 to 9.
Figure 6Average accuracy of five-fold cross-validation of RF Model in training samples (A) and testing samples (B).
The average RMSE (kg m-2), R2 and MAE (kg m-2) values for RF models with different trees to estimating AGB in the training and testing datasets.
| Model | Training dataset | Testing dataset | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSE | R2 | MAE | RMSE | R2 | MAE | |
| RF | 0.23 | 0.84 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 0.68 | 0.25 |
Figure 7Comparison of predicted with error bar in (A) and without error bar in (B) and actual values of AGB on RF Model validation sample set when N=390.
Figure 8AGB density distribution (A) and total AGB statistics (B) in Poyang Lake wetland in autumn from 2010 to 2016.
Validation accuracy for AGB inversion in 2010,2011,2012,2014 and 2015.
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2014 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Numbers of sampling points | 19 | 24 | 20 | 22 | 57 |
| RMSE(kg m-2) | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.41 |
The four most common vegetation communities’ biomass densities (kg m-2) in Poyang Lake wetland from 2010 to 2016.
| Year |
|
|
|
| Ave. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1.07 | 0.52 | 1.16 | 1.48 | 1.06 |
| 2011 | 1.72 | 0.57 | 1.26 | 1.56 | 1.28 |
| 2012 | 1.22 | 0.56 | 1.73 | 1.65 | 1.29 |
| 2013 | 1.25 | 0.66 | 1.30 | 1.40 | 1.15 |
| 2014 | 0.93 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 1.50 | 0.93 |
| 2015 | 1.63 | 0.98 | 1.42 | 1.16 | 1.30 |
| 2016 | 1.15 | 0.67 | 1.16 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
| Ave. | 1.28 | 0.64 | 1.26 | 1.39 |