| Literature DB >> 31681276 |
Lele Ye1,2, Teming Zhang3, Zhengchun Kang4, Gangqiang Guo2, Yongji Sun5, Kangming Lin2, Qunjia Huang2, Xinyu Shi2, Zhonglin Ni6, Ning Ding2, Kong-Nan Zhao2, Wenjun Chang7, Junjie Wang8, Feng Lin9, Xiangyang Xue2.
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) play essential roles in cancer development and progression. However, the association of TIICs with prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients remains elusive. Infiltration of TIICs was assessed using ssGSEA and CIBERSORT tools. The association of TIICs with prognosis was analyzed in 1,802 CRC data downloaded from the GEO (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and TCGA (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) databases. Three populations of TIICs, including CD66b+ tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs), FoxP3+ Tregs, and CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were selected for immunohistochemistry (IHC) validation analysis in 1,008 CRC biopsies, and their influence on clinical features and prognosis of CRC patients was analyzed. Prognostic models were constructed based on the training cohort (359 patients). The models were further tested and verified in testing (249 patients) and validation cohorts (400 patients). Based on ssGSEA and CIBERSORT analysis, the correlation between TIICs and CRC prognosis was inconsistent in different datasets. Moreover, the results with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) data in the same dataset also differed. The high abundance of TIICs found by ssGSEA or CIBERSORT tools can be used for prognostic evaluation effectively. IHC results showed that TANs, Tregs, TAMs were significantly correlated with prognosis in CRC patients and were independent prognostic factors (P DFS ≤ 0.001; P OS ≤ 0.023). The prognostic predictive models were constructed based on the numbers of TANs, Tregs, TAMs (C-indexDFS&OS = 0.86; AICDFS = 448.43; AICOS = 184.30) and they were more reliable than traditional indicators for evaluating prognosis in CRC patients. Besides, TIICs may affect the response to chemotherapy. In conclusion, TIICs were correlated with clinical features and prognosis in patients with CRC and thus can be used as markers.Entities:
Keywords: TAMs; TANs; TIICs; Tregs; chemotherapy; colorectal cancer; prognosis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31681276 PMCID: PMC6811516 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1A flow chart of the research conducted.
Figure 2Correlation of infiltrating TANs, TAMs, and Tregs with prognosis in CRC patients. (A) The IHC images were taken at 100 (upper panel) and 400 (lower panel) magnification. (B) Association of the number of infiltrating TANs, Tregs, TAMs with CRC prognosis. (C) Infiltration of TANs, TAMs, and Tregs transformed by using ssGSEA and CIBERSORT. The relative numerical values corresponding to the height of the histogram indicate the different levels of abundance and the proportions. (D) Survival analysis: HR results from Cox univariate analysis with the transformed data based on ssGSEA and CIBERSORT tools. ***P ≤ 0.001.
Figure 3Correlation of infiltrating TANs, Tregs, and TAMs with clinical features in CRC patients. Each dot represents one patient.
Correlation between TANs, Tregs, and TAMs and clinical features in the training cohort (n = 359).
| Age [ | 0.369 | 0.125 | 0.877 | ||||||
| ≤60 | 93 (51.7%) | 84 (46.9%) | 97 (53.3%) | 80 (45.2%) | 89 (48.9%) | 88 (49.7%) | |||
| >60 | 87 (48.3%) | 95 (53.1%) | 85 (46.7%) | 97 (54.8%) | 93 (51.1%) | 89 (50.3%) | |||
| Gender [ | 0.843 | 0.14 | |||||||
| Women | 63 (35.0%) | 91 (50.8%) | 79 (43.4%) | 75 (42.4%) | 85 (46.7%) | 69 (39.0%) | |||
| Men | 117 (65.0%) | 88 (49.2%) | 103 (56.6%) | 102 (57.6%) | 97 (53.3%) | 108 (61.0%) | |||
| Disease location [ | 0.281 | 0.196 | |||||||
| Rectum | 82 (45.6%) | 62 (34.6%) | 68 (37.4%) | 76 (42.9%) | 67 (36.8%) | 77 (43.5%) | |||
| Colon | 98 (54.4%) | 117 (65.4%) | 114 (62.6%) | 101 (57.1%) | 115 (63.2%) | 100 (56.5%) | |||
| TNM stage [ | 0.190 | 0.682 | 0.968 | ||||||
| I and II | 115 (63.9%) | 126 (70.4%) | 124 (68.1%) | 117 (66.1%) | 122 (67.0%) | 119 (67.2%) | |||
| III | 65 (36.1%) | 53 (29.6%) | 58 (31.9%) | 60 (33.9%) | 60 (33.0%) | 58 (32.8%) | |||
| Differentiation [ | 0.301 | ||||||||
| Well and moderately | 155 (86.1%) | 168 (93.9%) | 168 (92.3%) | 155 (87.6%) | 172 (94.5%) | 151 (85.3%) | |||
| Poorly | 13 (7.2%) | 4 (2.2%) | 6 (3.3%) | 11 (6.2%) | 1 (0.5%) | 16 (9.0%) | |||
| Missing | 12 (6.7%) | 7 (3.9%) | 8 (4.4%) | 11 (6.2%) | 9 (4.9%) | 10 (5.6%) | |||
| Number of lymph nodes (examined) [ | |||||||||
| ≤12 | 66 (36.7%) | 113 (63.1%) | 106 (58.2%) | 73 (41.2%) | 123 (67.6%) | 56 (31.6%) | |||
| >12 | 114 (63.3%) | 66 (36.9%) | 76 (41.8%) | 104 (58.8%) | 59 (32.4%) | 121 (68.4%) | |||
| Serum CEA [ | 0.863 | 0.830 | 0.389 | ||||||
| <5 | 107 (59.4%) | 108 (60.3%) | 108 (59.3%) | 107 (60.5%) | 105 (57.7%) | 110 (62.1%) | |||
| ≥5 | 73 (40.6%) | 71 (39.7%) | 74 (40.7%) | 70 (39.5%) | 77 (42.3%) | 67 (37.9%) | |||
| Serum CA199 [ | 0.909 | 0.170 | 0.591 | ||||||
| <37 | 148 (82.2%) | 148 (82.7%) | 155 (85.2%) | 141 (79.7%) | 152 (83.5%) | 144 (81.4%) | |||
| ≥37 | 32 (17.8%) | 31 (17.3%) | 27 (14.8%) | 36 (20.3%) | 30 (16.5%) | 33 (18.6%) | |||
χ.
The P values < 0.05 were bold.
Comparison of the prognostic accuracies of different models developed by the training cohort.
| TNM | 0.61 | 537.59 | TNM | 0.56 | 237.11 |
| TANs + Tregs + TAMs | 0.86 | 448.43 | TANs + Tregs + TAMs | 0.86 | 184.30 |
| TNM + TANs + Tregs + TAMs | 0.87 | 439.70 | TNM + TANs + Tregs + TAMs | 0.86 | 186.00 |
AIC, Akaike information criterion; C-index, Harrell index of concordance.
Figure 4Confirmation of the prognostic value of the mathematical model with CRC patients. Patients with CRC were divided into high- and low-risk subgroups at cut-off points of 1.44705 for DFS and 3.4513 for OS. The red lines represent high-risk groups of patients with CRC with substantial decreases in DFS and OS, the black lines represent low-risk groups of patients with CRC with relatively stable DFS and OS.
Figure 5Effects of TANs, Tregs, and TAMs on chemotherapeutic efficacy in patients with CRC. (A) Patients with CRC were divided into chemotherapy (n = 748) and non-chemotherapy (n = 260) groups. Each dot represents one patient, patients treated with or without chemotherapy represented with red or blue columns, respectively. (B) Results from Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses performed with TANs, Tregs, and TAMs shown within the graphs. (C) Risk analysis of the effects of chemotherapy on prognosis in patients with CRC, using the mathematical model described in Figure 4.