| Literature DB >> 31681193 |
Ting Huang1,2,3,4, Xin-Yu Peng1,2,3,4, Biao Gao1,2,3,4, Qi-Lin Wei1,2,3,4, Rong Xiang1,2,3,4, Ming-Gui Yuan1,2,3,4, Zhi-Hong Xu1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Necrotic enteritis (NE) causes huge economic losses to the poultry industry. Probiotics are used as potential alternatives to antibiotics to prevent NE. It is known that Clostridium butyricum can act as a probiotic that can prevent infection. However, whether or not it exerts a beneficial effect on NE in chickens remains elusive. Therefore, we investigated the impact of C. butyricum on immune response and intestinal microbiota during the development of NE in chickens, including experimental stages with basal diets, high-fishmeal-supplementation diets, and Clostridium perfringens challenge. Chickens were divided into two groups from day 1 to day 20: one group had its diet supplemented with C. butyricum supplementation and one did not. At day 20, the chickens were divided into four groups: C. perfringens challenged and unchallenged chickens with and without C. butyricum supplementation. All groups were fed a basal diet for 13 days and thereafter a basal diet with 50% fishmeal from day 14 to 24. Chickens were infected with C. perfringens from day 21 to 23. At days 13, 20 and 24, samples were collected for analysis of the relative expression of immune response and intestinal mucosa barrier-related genes and intestinal microbes. The results show that C. butyricum can inhibit the increase in IL-17A gene expression and the reduction in Claudin-1 gene induced-expression caused by C. perfringens challenge. Moreover, C. butyricum was found to increase the expression of anti-inflammatory IL-10 in infected chickens. Although C. butyricum was found to have a significant beneficial effect on the structure of intestinal bacteria in the basal diet groups and decrease the abundance of C. perfringens in the gut, it did not significantly affect the occurrence of intestinal lesions and did not significantly correct the shift in gut bacterial composition post C. perfringens infection. In conclusion, although C. butyricum promotes the expression of anti-inflammatory and tight junction protein genes and inhibits pro-inflammatory genes in C. perfringens-challenged chickens, it is not adequate to improve the structure of intestinal microbiota in NE chickens. Therefore, more effective schemes of C. butyricum supplementation to prevent and treat NE in chickens need to be identified.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium butyricum; Clostridium perfringens; gut microbiota; intestine barrier; mucosal immunity; necrotic enteritis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31681193 PMCID: PMC6797560 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Experimental design. CB_B (n = 60): C. butyricum supplemented chickens on a basal diet; CK_B (n = 60): C. butyricum non-supplemented chickens on a basal diet; CB_FM (n = 48): C. butyricum supplemented chickens on a high-fishmeal diet; CK_FM (n = 48): C. butyricum non-supplemented chickens on a high-fishmeal diet; CB/CP (n = 18): C. perfringens-challenged chickens with C. butyricum supplementation; CB (n = 18): C. perfringens-unchallenged chickens with C. butyricum supplementation; CP (n = 18): C. perfringens-challenged chickens without C. butyricum supplementation; CK (n = 18): C. perfringens-unchallenged chickens without C. butyricum supplementation.
FIGURE 2Relative abundance of C. perfringens in the jejunum-ileum lumen post 1-day challenge. All chickens tested negative for C. perfringens until experimentally challenged, and the unchallenged groups tested negative for C. perfringens throughout the study. ∗p < 0.05, measured using ANOVA; n = 6.
FIGURE 3Intestinal lesion scores of chickens after C. perfringens infection. Measured using ANOVA; n = 10. No intestinal lesion was found in the unchallenged groups.
FIGURE 4Relative expression of immune and intestinal mucosa barrier-related genes in the ileum. Relative gene expression is represented as log10 2–Δ Ct. Significant differences are indicated by an asterisk (ANOVA, ∗p < 0.05). CB_B, CK_B, CB_FM and CK_FM: n = 12; CB/CP, CB, CP and CK: n = 6.
FIGURE 5Diversity of the intestinal bacteria community at different stages. (A) Alpha diversity was estimated using Simpson and ACE indices values. ∗p < 0.05, measured using ANOVA. (B) Unique and shared intestinal OTUs shown in Venn diagrams. (C) PCoA plot of Bray-Curtis indices for the gut microbiota. PC1 comparisons were made using ANOVA. ∗p < 0.05. CB_B, CK_B, CB_FM and CK_FM: n = 12; CB/CP, CB, CP and CK: n = 6.
FIGURE 6Differential enrichment of intestinal microbiota between groups measured using LEfSe (LDA score = 3). Bars represent significant abundance from phylum to genus between (A) the CB_B and CK_B groups, (B) the CB_FM and CK_FM groups, (C) and the CB/CP and CP groups. CB_B, CK_B, CB_FM and CK_FM: n = 12; CB/CP, CB, CP and CK: n = 6.
FIGURE 7Heatmap of predicted KEGG pathways of the gut bacteria in each group. The gene copy numbers of each group are shown as mean values. The significant differences between two groups at different stages were measured using the Mann-Whitney U test with a cutoff of p < 0.05 and FDR < 0.1. No significant difference was found between the CB_B and CK_B groups, the CB/CP and CP groups, and the CB and CK groups. Comparisons between the CB/CP and CB groups and the CB and CP groups were not performed. CB_B, CK_B, CB_FM, and CK_FM: n = 12; CB/CP, CB, CP, and CK: n = 6. Comparisons between CB_FM and CK_FM groups, CB/CP and CK groups and CP and CK groups are presented in panel (A), (B), and (C) respectively.