| Literature DB >> 31680991 |
Kitti Garai1,2, Zoltan Adam1,2, Robert Herczeg3, Emese Katai2,4, Tamas Nagy2,4, Szilard Pal5, Attila Gyenesei3, Judit E Pongracz1,2, Marta Wilhelm6, Krisztian Kvell1,2.
Abstract
Studies support that regular physical activity (PA) decelerates senescence-related decline of physiological and molecular parameters in the elderly. We have addressed the other end of this spectrum: healthy and young, inactive individuals participated in a 6-month long personal trainer-guided lifestyle program. We have measured physiological and molecular parameters (differentiating high- and low responders) and their correlation with PA (sedentary status). Cluster analysis helped to distinguish individuals with high- or low PA and differentiate high- and low-responders of each parameter. The assessed cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, 6-min walking distance, relative VO2max), body composition parameters (body fat and muscle mass percentage) metabolic parameters (glucose, insulin, HDL, LDL), immune parameters (cortisol, CRP, lymphocyte counts, hTREC) all showed improvement. Artificial neural network analysis (ANN) showed correlation efficiencies of physiological and molecular parameters using a concept-free approach. ANN analysis appointed PA as the mastermind of molecular level changes. Besides sedentary status, insulin and hTREC showed significant segregation. Biostatistics evaluation also supported the schism of participants for their sedentary status, insulin concentration and hTREC copy number. In the future ANN and biostatistics, may predict individual responses to regular exercise. Our program reveals that high responder individuals of certain parameters may be low responders of others. Our data show that moderate regular PA is essential to counteract senescence in young and healthy individuals, despite individual differences in responsiveness. Such PA may not seem important in the everyday life of young and healthy adults, but shall become the base for healthy aging.Entities:
Keywords: aging; physical activity; prediction; prevention; responsiveness
Year: 2019 PMID: 31680991 PMCID: PMC6797842 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1Individual variation of physiological parameters in response to lifestyle program. (A–I) K-means cluster analysis was used to differentiate high- (HR) and low (LR) responders (n = 14). Bar graph values indicate standardized Z-score values, and standard deviation values. 3- and 6-month values were normalized to baseline values and converted to Z-scores. ∗Significant difference between HR and LR (p < 0.05). ∗∗Significant difference between HR and LR (p < 0.01). ∗∗∗Significant difference between HR and LR (p < 0.001). Please refer to Supplementary Material S1 for exact numerical values.
FIGURE 2Individual variation of metabolic parameters in response to lifestyle program. (A–D) K-means cluster analysis was used to differentiate high- (HR) and low (LR) responders (n = 14). Bar graph values indicate standardized Z-score values, and standard deviation values. 3- and 6-month values were normalized to baseline values and converted to Z-scores. ∗Significant difference between HR and LR (p < 0.05). ∗∗Significant difference between HR and LR (p < 0.01). ∗∗∗Significant difference between HR and LR (p < 0.001). Please refer to Supplementary Material S1 for exact numerical values.
FIGURE 3Individual variation of immunological parameters in response to lifestyle program. (A–D) K-means cluster analysis was used to differentiate high- (HR) and low (LR) responders (n = 14). Bar graph values indicate standardized Z-score values, and standard deviation values. 3- and 6-month values were normalized to baseline values and converted to Z-scores. ∗Significant difference between HR and LR (p < 0.05). ∗∗Significant difference between HR and LR (p < 0.01). ∗∗∗Significant difference between HR and LR (p < 0.001). Please refer to Supplementary Material S1 for exact numerical values.
FIGURE 4Artificial neural network (ANN) analysis of physiological and molecular parameters in response to lifestyle program. Heat map shows pairwise correlation efficiencies of physiological and molecular parameters (n = 14). Red color shows high correlation, green color indicates low correlation efficiency between parameters. Significance level of pairwise sensitivity correlation is shown by asterisks (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). Significance was determined using simple t-test. Mean squared error in last column indicates model accuracy.
FIGURE 5Biostatistics evaluation of physiological and molecular parameters in response to lifestyle program. (A–C) Dendrogram representation shows segregation of participants (n = 14) for sedentary status, insulin and hTREC. Please note that all three parameters show an early bifurcation indicating segregation into HR and LR individuals. (D–F) 3D plots allow for enhanced visualization of sedentary, insulin and hTREC parameter segregation. Please note the separation of HR and LR individuals (n = 14) represented by white spheres and gray triangles (view of angle was selected to aid the visualization of separation). X-axis shows baseline (0 month), Y-axis shows mid-term (3 months) and Z-axis shows program exit (6 months) values.