| Literature DB >> 31680750 |
Sadaksharam Jayachandran1, Prakasarao Aruna2, Manoharan Preethi1, M Yuvaraj2.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Age estimation in forensics employ various methods of which Raman microspectroscopy provides a noninvasive method by assessing various parts of dentin. AIM ANDEntities:
Keywords: Age determination; Raman spectrum; dentin; forensic dentistry
Year: 2019 PMID: 31680750 PMCID: PMC6822312 DOI: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_85_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Forensic Dent Sci ISSN: 0975-1475
Sampling
| Incisor | Canine | Premolar | Molar | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A (21-30 years) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Group B (31-40 years) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Group C (41-50 years) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Group D (51-60 years) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Figure 1Tooth sectioned into two along the long axis perpendicular to the occlusal surface with a straight handpiece and diamond disc
Figure 2Sectioned tooth stabilized by wax on a glass slide with the cut flat surface facing the microscope lens of a Raman spectroscopy Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRAM HR micro Raman system
Figure 3Raman spectra obtained for apical dentin showing peak at 963cm-1 for phosphate group
The summary statistics for the different ages of the sample teeth obtained from different age groups of the study
| Descriptive | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (age) | 25.16667 | 35.08333 | 44.75 | 55.25 |
| Median | 25 | 35 | 45 | 56 |
| Mode | 25 | 32 | 42 | 56 |
| Standard deviation | 2.405801 | 2.609714 | 2.562846 | 2.73446 |
| Sample variance | 5.787879 | 6.810606 | 6.568182 | 7.477273 |
| Skewness | 0.18716 | 0.07203 | 0.138525 | 0.28211 |
| Range | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Minimum | 21 | 31 | 41 | 51 |
| Maximum | 29 | 39 | 49 | 59 |
| Count | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Figure 4Age and tooth anatomy-based variations in the Raman spectra obtained from apical dentin
Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) for specimens between different age groups
| 21-30 years’ age group (Group A) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incisor | Canine | Premolar | Molar | |
| Incisor | 1 | 0.998726 | 0.970759 | 0.998527 |
| Canine | 0.998726 | 1 | 0.981635 | 0.994517 |
| Premolar | 0.970759 | 0.981635 | 1 | 0.956305 |
| Molar | 0.998527 | 0.994517 | 0.956305 | 1 |
| Incisor | 1 | 0.980158 | 0.883810 | 0.120491 |
| Canine | 0.980158 | 1 | 0.959009 | 0.314873 |
| Premolar | 0.883810 | 0.959009 | 1 | 0.314873 |
| Molar | 0.120491 | 0.314873 | 0.570927 | 1 |
| Incisor | 1 | 0.815167 | 0.782157 | 0.682211 |
| Canine | 0.815167 | 1 | 0.998474 | 0.962968 |
| Premolar | 0.782157 | 0.998474 | 1 | 0.976311 |
| Molar | 0.682211 | 0.962968 | 0.976311 | 1 |
| Incisor | 1 | 0.989785 | 0.972677 | 0.955144 |
| Canine | 0.989785 | 1 | 0.972677 | 0.955144 |
| Premolar | 0.972677 | 0.972677 | 1 | 0.860295 |
| Molar | 0.955144 | 0.955144 | 0.860295 | 1 |
‘r’ value >0.7 indicates strong correlation
One-way ANOVA
| ANOVA (one-way ANOVA) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source of variation | SS | Df | MS | F critic | ||
| Between groups | 416618.8 | 3 | 138872.9 | 4.537438 | 0.023968 | 3.490295 |
| Within groups | 367264.2 | 12 | 30605.35 | |||
| Total | 783882.9 | 15 | ||||
The test is significant at P<0.05 as P is 0.023. SS: Sum of squares, Df: Degrees of freedom, Ms: Mean square, F: F statistic, F critic: F critical value