| Literature DB >> 31680402 |
Philipp M Cromm1,2,3, Hélène Adihou1,4, Shobhna Kapoor1, Mercedes Vazquez-Chantada5, Paul Davey5, David Longmire5, Elisabeth Hennes1, Walter Hofer1, Philipp Küchler1, Elisabetta Chiarparin5, Herbert Waldmann1,2, Tom N Grossmann6.
Abstract
The acyl-binding UNC119 proteins mediate the activation and transport of various N-myristoylated proteins. In particular, UNC119a plays a crucial role in the completion of cytokinesis. Herein, we report the use of a lipidated peptide originating from the UNC119 binding partner Gnat1 as the basis for the design of lipidated, stabilized α-helical peptides that target UNC119a. By using the hydrocarbon peptide-stapling approach, cell-permeable binders of UNC119a were generated that induced the accumulation of cytokinetic and binucleated cells; this suggests UNC119a as a potential target for the inhibition of cytokinesis.Entities:
Keywords: alpha-helixes; macrocyclization; peptidomimetics; protein-protein interaction; trafficking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31680402 PMCID: PMC6973269 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201900615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chembiochem ISSN: 1439-4227 Impact factor: 3.164
Figure 1A) Crystal structure of the lauroylated N terminus of Gnat1 bound to UNC119a (PDB ID: 3RBQ); B) The N‐terminal α‐helix is inserted into the lipid binding pocket of UNC119a with only the unordered part of the peptide standing out (PDB ID: 3RBQ).8
Figure 2A) Structure and sequence of the lauroylated UNC119a/‐b binding stretch of Gnat1. For clarification, the peptide sequence is divided into various sections (PDB ID: 3RBQ); B) Sequences and binding affinities of the tested UNC119‐binding peptides (1–10, for details on the peptides, see Figure S1 and Table S1). The α‐methylated building blocks and N‐terminal modifications are highlighted. Binding selectivity: bs=K d[UNC119b]/K d[UNC119a]; triplicate measurements, errors represent 1 σ“; n.b. no binding (for binding curves, see Figure S2).
Figure 3A) Unlabeled peptide 4 increases the number of cells with 4 N DNA content (N=number of chromosome sets). L cells were treated with peptide for 72 h or not (NC served as the control). The DNA content of L cells was determined by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Results were obtained from triplicate measurements of L cells (errors represent 1 σ). Significances compared to DMSO (unpaired t‐test): n.s. p>0.05, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001. For details, see Figure S5 and Table S2; B) HeLa cell were treated with 25 μm unlabeled peptide 4 for 72 h or 1 μm NC for 24 h prior to fixation and staining of microtubules (green, anti‐tubulin antibody) and DNA (blue, DAPI). Arrows indicate binucleated cells. Magnification shows a binucleated cell after treatment with peptide 4.
Subcellular distribution of unlabeled peptides investigated by mass spectrometry (0.5 and 72 h incubation at c(peptide)=25 μm). If no peptide was detected, the lower limit of quantification is given (for details see Table S7).
|
|
Peptide concentration [pmol per 106 cells] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peptide |
Total cell |
Nucleus |
Cytosol | ||
|
|
0.5 h |
0.5 h |
72 h |
0.5 h |
72 h |
|
|
60 |
0.22 |
0.45 |
<0.001 |
0.01 |
|
|
0.24 |
<0.04 |
<0.04 |
<0.04 |
<0.04 |
|
R8 |
52 |
0.56 |
0.64 |
0.58 |
0.65 |