George J Schwartz1, Christopher Cox2, Jesse C Seegmiller3, Paula S Maier4, Donna DiManno4, Sue L Furth5, Bradley A Warady6, Alvaro Munoz2. 1. University of Rochester Medical Center, Box 777, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, USA. george_schwartz@urmc.rochester.edu. 2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. University of Rochester Medical Center, Box 777, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, USA. 5. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cystatin C is a key GFR biomarker. Recently, Siemens recalibrated the assay based on certified reference material ERM-DA471/IFCC. The NIH-funded longitudinal chronic kidney disease in children (CKiD) study has > 3000 cystatin C measurements based on a pre-IFCC calibrator provided by Siemens. Since cystatin C values for CKiD are now standardized to IFCC certified reference material, it is important to relate the IFCC-calibrated results to the previous values so that there are no discontinuous results. METHODS: We diluted cystatin C ERM-DA471/IFCC (5.48 mg/L) into buffer and compared results with predicted ones. We then updated the cystatin C application on our BN II nephelometer to provide results based on pre-IFCC and IFCC calibrations of CKiD specimens simultaneously. We assayed 51 previously analyzed sera and 62 fresh additional specimens. RESULTS: The predicted concentrations from the IFCC standard were consistently 17% higher than the measured values using the pre-IFCC calibration (y = 1.1686x). Similarly, the re-run and fresh sample concentrations were 17% higher via the IFCC calibration than by the pre-IFCC calibration (y = 1.168x). There was very high reliability in the measurements using the previous calibration for re-run specimens (0.99) and for 33 pristine specimens using IFCC calibration (0.99). CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the recalibration proposed by Siemens. To convert pre-IFCC results to IFCC-calibrated concentrations, the value is multiplied by 1.17. Conversely, one divides IFCC-calibrated results by 1.17 to estimate GFR via previously published pre-IFCC CKiD eGFR equations. For older adolescents, cystatin C has already been standardized and can be directly applied to the CKD-EPI equations.
BACKGROUND:Cystatin C is a key GFR biomarker. Recently, Siemens recalibrated the assay based on certified reference material ERM-DA471/IFCC. The NIH-funded longitudinal chronic kidney disease in children (CKiD) study has > 3000 cystatin C measurements based on a pre-IFCC calibrator provided by Siemens. Since cystatin C values for CKiD are now standardized to IFCC certified reference material, it is important to relate the IFCC-calibrated results to the previous values so that there are no discontinuous results. METHODS: We diluted cystatin C ERM-DA471/IFCC (5.48 mg/L) into buffer and compared results with predicted ones. We then updated the cystatin C application on our BN II nephelometer to provide results based on pre-IFCC and IFCC calibrations of CKiD specimens simultaneously. We assayed 51 previously analyzed sera and 62 fresh additional specimens. RESULTS: The predicted concentrations from the IFCC standard were consistently 17% higher than the measured values using the pre-IFCC calibration (y = 1.1686x). Similarly, the re-run and fresh sample concentrations were 17% higher via the IFCC calibration than by the pre-IFCC calibration (y = 1.168x). There was very high reliability in the measurements using the previous calibration for re-run specimens (0.99) and for 33 pristine specimens using IFCC calibration (0.99). CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the recalibration proposed by Siemens. To convert pre-IFCC results to IFCC-calibrated concentrations, the value is multiplied by 1.17. Conversely, one divides IFCC-calibrated results by 1.17 to estimate GFR via previously published pre-IFCCCKiDeGFR equations. For older adolescents, cystatin C has already been standardized and can be directly applied to the CKD-EPI equations.
Authors: Gerald Vervoort; Jacqueline M T Klein Gunnewiek; Hans L Willems; Jack F M Wetzels Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Lesley A Inker; Christopher H Schmid; Hocine Tighiouart; John H Eckfeldt; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Jane Manzi; Frederick Van Lente; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: George J Schwartz; Michael F Schneider; Paula S Maier; Marva Moxey-Mims; Vikas R Dharnidharka; Bradley A Warady; Susan L Furth; Alvaro Muñoz Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Derek K Ng; Susan L Furth; Bradley A Warady; Deidra C Crews; Jesse C Seegmiller; George J Schwartz Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 11.072
Authors: Stefanie W Benoit; Thelma Kathman; Jay Patel; Melinda Stegman; Cristina Cobb; Jonathan Hoehn; Prasad Devarajan; Edward J Nehus Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2020-12-07