Caroline Agnelli1,2,3, Emilio Bouza1,2,4,5, María Del Carmen Martínez-Jiménez1,2, Raquel Navarro1,2, Maricela Valerio1,2, Marina Machado1,2,5, Jesús Guinea1,2,4,5, Carlos Sánchez-Carrillo1, Roberto Alonso1,2,5, Patricia Muñoz1,2,4,5. 1. Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. 2. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CB06/06/0058), Spain. 5. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance and the potential prognostic role of persistently negative (1,3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) in adults with proven candidemia is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective study included all adults diagnosed with candidemia our tertiary university hospital from 2012-2017 who had at least 2 serum BDG determinations throughout the episode of fungemia (Fungitell Assay; positive cut-off ≥80pg/mL). Epidemiology and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with all negative versus any positive BDG tests. Poor clinical outcomes included complications due to candidemia or 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 26/148 (17.6%) candidemic adults had persistently negative BDG tests. These patients were less likely to present Candida growth in all 3 sets of blood cultures (15.4% vs 45.1%; P = .005) and had less severe clinical presentations (median Pitt score, 0 [interquartile range {IQR} 0-1] vs 1 [IQR 0-2] in patients with any positive BDG test; P = .039). Although adequate treatment was equally provided to both groups (96.2% in persistently negative group vs 93.4 in positive group; P = .599), the persistently negative group had a higher rate of microbiological clearance in the first follow-up blood cultures (92.3% vs 69.7% in positive group; P = .005), fewer complications due to candidemia (7.7% vs 33.6% in positive group; P = .008), a lower 30-day mortality rate (3.8% vs 23.8% in positive group; P = .004), and a shorter in-hospital stay (34 days [IQR 18-55] vs 51 days [IQR 35-91] in positive group; P = .003). In the multivariate analysis, persistently negative BDG tests were independently associated with better prognoses (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.49; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Candidemic patients with persistently negative BDG tests present a better prognosis than the comparative group, probably due to a lower systemic fungal burden. In this context, the appropriate use of persistently negative BDG results could be an aid to individualize therapeutic management in the near future.
BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance and the potential prognostic role of persistently negative (1,3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) in adults with proven candidemia is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective study included all adults diagnosed with candidemia our tertiary university hospital from 2012-2017 who had at least 2 serum BDG determinations throughout the episode of fungemia (Fungitell Assay; positive cut-off ≥80pg/mL). Epidemiology and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with all negative versus any positive BDG tests. Poor clinical outcomes included complications due to candidemia or 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 26/148 (17.6%) candidemic adults had persistently negative BDG tests. These patients were less likely to present Candida growth in all 3 sets of blood cultures (15.4% vs 45.1%; P = .005) and had less severe clinical presentations (median Pitt score, 0 [interquartile range {IQR} 0-1] vs 1 [IQR 0-2] in patients with any positive BDG test; P = .039). Although adequate treatment was equally provided to both groups (96.2% in persistently negative group vs 93.4 in positive group; P = .599), the persistently negative group had a higher rate of microbiological clearance in the first follow-up blood cultures (92.3% vs 69.7% in positive group; P = .005), fewer complications due to candidemia (7.7% vs 33.6% in positive group; P = .008), a lower 30-day mortality rate (3.8% vs 23.8% in positive group; P = .004), and a shorter in-hospital stay (34 days [IQR 18-55] vs 51 days [IQR 35-91] in positive group; P = .003). In the multivariate analysis, persistently negative BDG tests were independently associated with better prognoses (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.49; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Candidemic patients with persistently negative BDG tests present a better prognosis than the comparative group, probably due to a lower systemic fungal burden. In this context, the appropriate use of persistently negative BDG results could be an aid to individualize therapeutic management in the near future.
Authors: Sowmya Sridharan; Ram Gopalakrishnan; Panchatcharam S Nambi; Suresh Kumar; Nandini Sethuraman; V Ramasubramanian Journal: Indian J Crit Care Med Date: 2021-03