Literature DB >> 31679914

Risk of Cervical Dysplasia After Colposcopy Care and Risk-Informed Return to Population-Based Screening: A Systematic Review.

Michelle Costa-Fagbemi1, Mafo Yakubu1, Olivia Meggetto1, Jessica Moffatt1, Meghan J Walker2, Anna Pefoyo Koné3, K Joan Murphy4, Rachel Kupets5.   

Abstract

This systematic review examined the risk of cervical dysplasia among women who have undergone a colposcopy episode of care to inform their return to population-based cervical screening. PubMed, Embase, and grey literature were searched between January 2000 and 2018. One reviewer screened citations against pre-defined eligibility criteria. A second reviewer verified 10% and 100% of exclusions at title and abstract and at full-text screening, respectively. One reviewer extracted data and assessed methodological quality of included articles; a second reviewer verified these in full. The primary outcome was incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater (CIN2+) subsequent to initial colposcopy evaluation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of CIN2+ after negative follow-up test results and performance of follow-up strategies. Results were synthesized narratively. A total of 48 studies were included. The 1- to 5-year CIN2+ risks after colposcopy evaluation ranged from 2.4% to 16.5% among women treated for CIN2+ and from 0.7% to 16.8% among women untreated for CIN grade 1 or less (≤CIN1). Follow-up strategies included single or repeat cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, or combined HPV/cytology co-testing at various intervals. After negative follow-up test results, risk varied by follow-up strategy for both groups and by referral cytology severity for untreated women. Performance of follow-up strategies varied among treated women. Among untreated women, co-testing demonstrated greater sensitivity than cytology alone. In conclusion, women treated during colposcopy for CIN2+ and women with ≤CIN1 who were referred to colposcopy for low-grade cytology and who did not receive treatment may be able to return to population-based screening after negative co-testing results. Current evidence does not suggest that women untreated for ≤CIN1 who are referred for high-grade cytology be returned to screening at an average risk interval. The optimal strategy for colposcopy discharge needs ongoing evaluation as implementation of HPV testing evolves.
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aftercare; colposcopy; patient discharge; systematic review; uterine cervical dyspasia

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31679914     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  1 in total

1.  The Accuracy of Cytology, Colposcopy and Pathology in Evaluating Precancerous Cervical Lesions.

Authors:  Liana Pleş; Julia-Carolina Radosa; Romina-Marina Sima; Radu Chicea; Octavian-Gabriel Olaru; Mircea-Octavian Poenaru
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.