| Literature DB >> 31679651 |
Zirui Dong1, Junhao Yan2, Fengping Xu3, Jianying Yuan4, Hui Jiang4, Huilin Wang5, Haixiao Chen4, Lei Zhang2, Lingfei Ye4, Jinjin Xu4, Yuhua Shi2, Zhenjun Yang6, Ye Cao7, Lingyun Chen4, Qiaoling Li4, Xia Zhao4, Jiguang Li4, Ao Chen4, Wenwei Zhang4, Hoi Gin Wong7, Yingying Qin2, Han Zhao2, Yuan Chen4, Pei Li8, Tao Ma4, Wen-Jing Wang4, Yvonne K Kwok7, Yuan Jiang9, Amber N Pursley10, Jacqueline P W Chung11, Yan Hong12, Karsten Kristiansen13, Huanming Yang14, Raul E Piña-Aguilar15, Tak Yeung Leung16, Sau Wai Cheung17, Cynthia C Morton18, Kwong Wai Choy19, Zi-Jiang Chen20.
Abstract
Recurrent miscarriage (RM) affects millions of couples globally, and half of them have no demonstrated etiology. Genome sequencing (GS) is an enhanced and novel cytogenetic tool to define the contribution of chromosomal abnormalities in human diseases. In this study we evaluated its utility in RM-affected couples. We performed low-pass GS retrospectively for 1,090 RM-affected couples, all of whom had routine chromosome analysis. A customized sequencing and interpretation pipeline was developed to identify chromosomal rearrangements and deletions/duplications with confirmation by fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray analysis, and PCR studies. Low-pass GS yielded results in 1,077 of 1,090 couples (98.8%) and detected 127 chromosomal abnormalities in 11.7% (126/1,077) of couples; both members of one couple were identified with inversions. Of the 126 couples, 39.7% (50/126) had received former diagnostic results by karyotyping characteristic of normal human male or female karyotypes. Low-pass GS revealed additional chromosomal abnormalities in 50 (4.0%) couples, including eight with balanced translocations and 42 inversions. Follow-up studies of these couples showed a higher miscarriage/fetal-anomaly rate of 5/10 (50%) compared to 21/93 (22.6%) in couples with normal GS, resulting in a relative risk of 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 4.6). In these couples, this protocol significantly increased the diagnostic yield of chromosomal abnormalities per couple (11.7%) in comparison to chromosome analysis (8.0%, chi-square test p = 0.000751). In summary, low-pass GS identified underlying chromosomal aberrations in 1 in 9 RM-affected couples, enabling identification of a subgroup of couples with increased risk of subsequent miscarriage who would benefit from a personalized intervention.Entities:
Keywords: balanced translocation; chromosomal abnormality; chromothripsis and chomoplexy; copy number variants; cryptic structural rearrangements; genetics complexity; inversion; low-pass genome sequencing; preimplantation genetic testing; recurrent miscarriage
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31679651 PMCID: PMC6904795 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hum Genet ISSN: 0002-9297 Impact factor: 11.025