Literature DB >> 31678491

Dual-energy estimates of volumetric bone mineral densities in the lumbar spine using quantitative computed tomography better correlate with fracture properties when compared to single-energy BMD outcomes.

Simon Cataño Jimenez1, Sebastian Saldarriaga1, Christopher D Chaput2, Hugo Giambini3.   

Abstract

It is estimated that over 200 million people worldwide are affected by osteoporosis. Vertebral fracture risk prediction using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is confounded by limitations of the technology, such as 2D measurements of bone mineral density (BMD), inability to measure bone distribution and heterogeneity, and potential overestimations of BMD due to degenerative diseases. To overcome these shortcomings, single energy (SE) quantitative computed tomography (QCT) imaging estimates of Hounsfield units (HU) and volumetric BMD have been implemented as alternative methodologies for assessing fracture risk. However, marrow fat within the vertebrae can highly affect the vBMD and fracture properties estimations. To address this issue, 54 vertebrae were dissected from nine cadaveric spines and scanned using SE-QCT (120kVp) and dual energy (DE)-QCT (80/140 kVp), with the latter accounting for marrow fat within the vertebrae. The vertebrae were then scanned using DXA and subjected to mechanical testing to obtain fracture properties. aBMD outcomes from DXA showed a better correlation with DE-QCT vBMD versus SE outcomes [DE: aBMD vs. vBMD (R2: 0.61); SE: aBMD vs. vBMD (R2: 0.27)]. SE-QCT underestimated vertebral vBMD by -56% (p<0.0001) when compared to DE-QCT. vBMD estimates from SE-QCT could predict 45% and 37% of the vertebral failure loads and stiffness, respectively, compared to 67% and 46% from DE-QCT. DE-QCT vBMD outcomes highly correlated with fracture properties of vertebrae as compared to SE-QCT metrics. As DE scanning has the ability to correct for the effects of bone marrow fat, estimated vBMD from SE-QCT were significantly underestimated compared to DE-QCT. Dual energy CT scanning has the potential to more accurately predict vertebral failure and aid the clinician in the evaluation of appropriate interventions. Future studies should consider implementing DE-QCT in their fracture assessment.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DXA; Osteoporosis; Prediction; QCT; Vertebral fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31678491     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  4 in total

1.  Effects of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Metabolism in Chinese Patients with Obesity.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Chunlan Zhang; Jingping Li; Wei Liu; Jingjing Zhang; Zhiguang Zhou
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Management of vertebral compression fractures: the role of dual-energy CT in clinical practice.

Authors:  Giovanni Foti; Fabio Lombardo; Massimo Guerriero; Tommaso Rodella; Carmelo Cicciò; Niccolò Faccioli; Gerardo Serra; Guglielmo Manenti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Computed tomography-based opportunistic osteoporosis assessment: a comparison of two software applications for lumbar vertebral volumetric bone mineral density measurements.

Authors:  Mischa Woisetschläger; Martin Hägg; Anna Spångeus
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

4.  Opportunistic application of phantom-less calibration methods for fracture risk prediction using QCT/FEA.

Authors:  Maria Prado; Sundeep Khosla; Christopher Chaput; Hugo Giambini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.