Literature DB >> 31678125

Impact of the Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique on Total Aortic Arch Replacement.

Koji Hirano1, Toshiya Tokui2, Bun Nakamura2, Ryosai Inoue2, Masahiro Inagaki2, Reina Hirano2, Shuji Chino3, Yasumi Maze2, Noriyuki Kato4, Motoshi Takao5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique can facilitate the distal anastomosis of total arch replacement (TAR); therefore, the technique is increasingly being used in TAR cases. However, identifying suitable patients remains controversial. This study analyzes the outcome of TAR using FET and clarifies the indications for using FET.
METHODS: Patients who underwent TAR between January 2008 and December 2018 were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: that is, patients treated with conventional TAR (cTAR group, n = 39) and those treated with TAR using FET (TAR-FET group, n = 76). Early and late outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the TAR-FET group (447.0 ± 82.1 min) than in the cTAR group (509.4 ± 123.9 min) (P < 0.01). Likewise, circulatory arrest time was significantly shorter in the TAR-FET group (29.0 ± 7.8 min) than in the cTAR group (64.2 ± 20.2 min) (P < 0.001). Postoperative renal function tended to be preserved in the TAR-FET group. Recurrent nerve palsy was less frequent in the TAR-FET group (9.2%) compared with the cTAR group (25.6%) (P < 0.05). Patients with chronic aortic dissection tended to undergo reintervention more frequently following TAR using the FET technique.
CONCLUSIONS: The FET technique contributed to save operation and circulatory arrest times during TAR and seemed less invasive in terms of renal function and less-frequent recurrent nerve palsy. Considering posttreatment reintervention, however, care should be taken in its application to chronic aortic dissection.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31678125     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  4 in total

1.  Hybrid repair versus conventional open repair for thoracic aortic arch aneurysms.

Authors:  Ala Elhelali; Niamh Hynes; Declan Devane; Sherif Sultan; Edel P Kavanagh; Liam Morris; Dave Veerasingam; Fionnuala Jordan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 2.  Incidence of Distal Stent Graft Induced New Entry vs. Aortic Remodeling Associated With Frozen Elephant Trunk.

Authors:  Matti Jubouri; Fatima Kayali; Priyanshu Saha; Daniyal M Ansari; Yousef Rezaei; Sven Z C P Tan; Mostafa Mousavizadeh; Saeid Hosseini; Idhrees Mohammed; Mohamad Bashir
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-10

3.  Clinical outcomes of limited repair and conservative approaches in older patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Yasumi Maze; Toshiya Tokui; Masahiko Murakami; Bun Nakamura; Ryosai Inoue; Reina Hirano; Koji Hirano
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 4.  The great vessel freeze-out: A meta-analysis of conventional versus frozen elephant trunks in aortic arch surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas A Vernice; Matthew E Wingo; Paul B Walker; Michelle Demetres; Lily N Stalter; Qiuyu Yang; Andreas R de Biasi
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 1.778

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.