Maha Alattas1, Craig S Ross2, Elizabeth R Henehan2, Timothy S Naimi3. 1. Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, 02118, MA, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, 02118, MA, USA; Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, 02118, MA, USA. 3. Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, 02118, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, 02118, MA, USA; Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, 02118, MA, USA. Electronic address: tim.naimi@bmc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although more restrictive alcohol control policies (e.g., higher alcohol taxes) are related to lower levels of alcohol consumption, little is known about the relationship between alcohol policies and rates of alcohol-attributable cancer. METHODS: State alcohol policy restrictiveness, as measured by a validated policy scale, were related to state rates of six alcohol attributable cancers in the U.S. from 2006 to 2010 in a lagged, cross-sectional linear regression that controlled for a variety of state-level factors. Cancer mortality rates were from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Alcohol-Related Disease Impact application, which uses population-attributable fraction methodology to calculate mortality from cancers of the esophagus, larynx, liver, oropharynx, prostate (male only) and breast (female only). RESULTS: More restrictive state alcohol policies were associated with lower cancer mortality rates for the six cancer types overall (beta [β] -0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.59, -0.07), and among men (β -0.45; 95% CI -0.81, -0.10) and women (β -0.21; 95% CI -0.40, -0.02). A 10% increase in the restrictiveness of alcohol policies (based on the mean APS among states) was associated with an 8.5% decrease in rates of combined alcohol-attributable cancers. In all analyses stratified by cancer subtype and sex, the associations were in the hypothesized direction (i.e., more restrictive state policy environments were associated with lower rates of alcohol-attributable cancers), with the exception of laryngeal cancer among women. CONCLUSION: Strengthening alcohol policies is a promising prevention strategy for alcohol-related cancer.
BACKGROUND: Although more restrictive alcohol control policies (e.g., higher alcohol taxes) are related to lower levels of alcohol consumption, little is known about the relationship between alcohol policies and rates of alcohol-attributable cancer. METHODS: State alcohol policy restrictiveness, as measured by a validated policy scale, were related to state rates of six alcohol attributable cancers in the U.S. from 2006 to 2010 in a lagged, cross-sectional linear regression that controlled for a variety of state-level factors. Cancer mortality rates were from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Alcohol-Related Disease Impact application, which uses population-attributable fraction methodology to calculate mortality from cancers of the esophagus, larynx, liver, oropharynx, prostate (male only) and breast (female only). RESULTS: More restrictive state alcohol policies were associated with lower cancer mortality rates for the six cancer types overall (beta [β] -0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.59, -0.07), and among men (β -0.45; 95% CI -0.81, -0.10) and women (β -0.21; 95% CI -0.40, -0.02). A 10% increase in the restrictiveness of alcohol policies (based on the mean APS among states) was associated with an 8.5% decrease in rates of combined alcohol-attributable cancers. In all analyses stratified by cancer subtype and sex, the associations were in the hypothesized direction (i.e., more restrictive state policy environments were associated with lower rates of alcohol-attributable cancers), with the exception of laryngeal cancer among women. CONCLUSION: Strengthening alcohol policies is a promising prevention strategy for alcohol-related cancer.
Authors: Susan M Gapstur; Elisa V Bandera; David H Jernigan; Noelle K LoConte; Brian G Southwell; Vasilis Vasiliou; Abenaa M Brewster; Timothy S Naimi; Courtney L Scherr; Kevin D Shield Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Kate Vallance; Alexandria Vincent; Nour Schoueri-Mychasiw; Tim Stockwell; David Hammond; Thomas K Greenfield; Jonathan McGavock; Erin Hobin Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Mengfei Fu; Li Yu; Liu Yang; Yang Chen; Xiao Chen; Qinyu Hu; Hui Sun Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 6.055
Authors: Taylor D Ellington; Behnoosh Momin; Reda J Wilson; S Jane Henley; Manxia Wu; A Blythe Ryerson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Taylor D Ellington; S Jane Henley; Virginia Senkomago; Mary Elizabeth O'Neil; Reda J Wilson; Simple Singh; Cheryll C Thomas; Manxia Wu; Lisa C Richardson Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: William M P Klein; Mary E O'Connell; Michele H Bloch; Susan M Czajkowski; Paige A Green; Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; Linda C Nebeling; Robin C Vanderpool Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 13.506