Hanneke Kruize1, Irene van Kamp2, Magdalena van den Berg3, Elise van Kempen2, Wanda Wendel-Vos4, Annemarie Ruijsbroek4, Wim Swart2, Jolanda Maas5, Christopher Gidlow6, Graham Smith6, Naomi Ellis6, Gemma Hurst6, Daniel Masterson6, Margarita Triguero-Mas7, Marta Cirach8, Regina Gražulevičienė9, Peter van den Hazel10, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen7. 1. Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Hanneke.Kruize@rivm.nl. 2. Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. 3. Municipal Health Service Gelderland-Midden, Arnhem, the Netherlands. 4. Centre for Prevention and Health Services, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. 5. VU University, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 6. Centre for Health and Development (CHAD), Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom. 7. ISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. 8. ISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain. 9. Vytauto Didziojo Universitetas, Kaunas, Lithuania. 10. VGGM, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the large number of studies on beneficial effects of the natural outdoor environment (NOE) on health, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the relations between amount, quality, use and experience of the NOE; and physical activity, social contacts and mental well-being. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, data on GIS-derived measures of residential surrounding greenness (NDVI), NOE within 300 m, and audit data on quality of the streetscape were combined with questionnaire data from 3947 adults in four European cities. These included time spent in NOE (use); and perceived greenness, and satisfaction with and importance given to the NOE (experience). Physical activity, social contacts and mental health were selected as key outcome indicators. Descriptive and multilevel analyses were conducted both on pooled data and for individual cities. RESULTS: More minutes spent in the NOE were associated with more minutes of physical activity, a higher frequency of social contacts with neighbors, and better mental well-being. Perceived greenness, satisfaction with and importance of the NOE, were other strong predictors of the outcomes, while GIS measures of NOE and streetscape quality were not. We found clear differences between the four cities. CONCLUSIONS: Use and experience of the natural outdoor environment are important predictors for beneficial effects of the natural outdoor environment and health. Future research should focus more on these aspects to further increase our understanding of these mechanisms, and needs to take the local context into account.
BACKGROUND: Despite the large number of studies on beneficial effects of the natural outdoor environment (NOE) on health, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the relations between amount, quality, use and experience of the NOE; and physical activity, social contacts and mental well-being. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, data on GIS-derived measures of residential surrounding greenness (NDVI), NOE within 300 m, and audit data on quality of the streetscape were combined with questionnaire data from 3947 adults in four European cities. These included time spent in NOE (use); and perceived greenness, and satisfaction with and importance given to the NOE (experience). Physical activity, social contacts and mental health were selected as key outcome indicators. Descriptive and multilevel analyses were conducted both on pooled data and for individual cities. RESULTS: More minutes spent in the NOE were associated with more minutes of physical activity, a higher frequency of social contacts with neighbors, and better mental well-being. Perceived greenness, satisfaction with and importance of the NOE, were other strong predictors of the outcomes, while GIS measures of NOE and streetscape quality were not. We found clear differences between the four cities. CONCLUSIONS: Use and experience of the natural outdoor environment are important predictors for beneficial effects of the natural outdoor environment and health. Future research should focus more on these aspects to further increase our understanding of these mechanisms, and needs to take the local context into account.
Authors: Sarai Pouso; Ángel Borja; Lora E Fleming; Erik Gómez-Baggethun; Mathew P White; María C Uyarra Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Mathew P White; Lewis R Elliott; James Grellier; Theo Economou; Simon Bell; Gregory N Bratman; Marta Cirach; Mireia Gascon; Maria L Lima; Mare Lõhmus; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Ann Ojala; Anne Roiko; P Wesley Schultz; Matilda van den Bosch; Lora E Fleming Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marcia P Jimenez; Nicole V DeVille; Elise G Elliott; Jessica E Schiff; Grete E Wilt; Jaime E Hart; Peter James Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kaili Chen; Tianzheng Zhang; Fangyuan Liu; Yingjie Zhang; Yan Song Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Regina Grazuleviciene; Sandra Andrusaityte; Audrius Dėdelė; Tomas Grazulevicius; Leonas Valius; Aurimas Rapalavicius; Violeta Kapustinskiene; Inga Bendokiene Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hanneke Kruize; Nina van der Vliet; Brigit Staatsen; Ruth Bell; Aline Chiabai; Gabriel Muiños; Sahran Higgins; Sonia Quiroga; Pablo Martinez-Juarez; Monica Aberg Yngwe; Fotis Tsichlas; Pania Karnaki; Maria Luísa Lima; Silvestre García de Jalón; Matluba Khan; George Morris; Ingrid Stegeman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maria Torres Toda; Asier Anabitarte Riol; Marta Cirach; Marisa Estarlich; Ana Fernández-Somoano; Llúcia González-Safont; Mònica Guxens; Jordi Julvez; Isolina Riaño-Galán; Jordi Sunyer; Payam Dadvand Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 3.390