Literature DB >> 31677227

Navigated robotic assistance improves pedicle screw accuracy in minimally invasive surgery of the lumbosacral spine: 600 pedicle screws in a single institution.

David J Wallace1, Arnold B Vardiman1, Grant A Booher1, Neil R Crawford2, Jessica R Riggleman2, Samantha L Greeley2, Charles G Ledonio1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the emerging field of robot-assisted spine surgery, radiographic evaluation of pedicle screw accuracy in the surgical setting is of high interest. Advances in medical imaging have improved the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, from fluoroscopy-guided to computer-aided navigation.
METHODS: A retrospective, institutional review board-exempt review of the first 106 navigated robot-assisted spine surgery cases was performed. Radiographic evaluation of preoperative and postoperative computerized tomography (CT) scans were collected.
RESULTS: In the first 106 cases, 630 lumbosacral pedicle screws were placed. Thirty screws were placed in five patients without the robot because of surgeon discretion. Of the 600 pedicle screws inserted by navigated robotic guidance, only 1.5% (9/600) were repositioned intraoperatively.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a high level of accuracy (98.2%) in terms of grade A or B pedicle screw breach scores in the clinical use of navigated, robot-assisted surgery in its first 101 cases.
© 2019 The Authors. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  minimally invasive; pedicle screw placement; robot-navigated; spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31677227     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  8 in total

1.  Image Guidance in Spinal Surgery: A Critical Appraisal and Future Directions.

Authors:  Fabian Sommer; Jacob L Goldberg; Lynn McGrath; Sertac Kirnaz; Branden Medary; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-10

Review 2.  The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery.

Authors:  Meng Huang; Tyler A Tetreault; Avani Vaishnav; Philip J York; Blake N Staub
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

3.  Do People Trust in Robot-Assisted Surgery? Evidence from Europe.

Authors:  Joan Torrent-Sellens; Ana Isabel Jiménez-Zarco; Francesc Saigí-Rubió
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Comparative Analysis of Optoelectronic Accuracy in the Laboratory Setting Versus Clinical Operative Environment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunningham; Daina M Brooks
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04

5.  Comparison of accuracy and safety between second-generation TiRobot-assisted and free-hand thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Kai Yan; Qi Zhang; Wei Tian
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.030

6.  Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Ren-Jie Zhang; Lu-Ping Zhou; Lai Zhang; Hua-Qing Zhang; Jian-Xiang Zhang; Cai-Liang Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.677

7.  Application of a new percutaneous multi-function pedicle locator in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Xiaojian Liu; Hairun Liu; Yushan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Combined 3-dimensional printing model and 3-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation to assist C2 pedicle screw insertion: A case report.

Authors:  Hao-Tian Xu; Shuang Zheng; Rong-Peng Dong; Tong Yu; Jian-Wu Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.