Literature DB >> 31676969

Landscape context differentially drives diet breadth for two key pollinator species.

Sarah Cusser1, John L Neff2, Shalene Jha3.   

Abstract

An animal's diet contributes to its survival and reproduction. Variation in diet can alter the structure of community-level consumer-resource networks, with implications for ecological function. However, much remains unknown about the underlying drivers of diet breadth. Here we use a network approach to understand how consumer diet changes in response to local and landscape context and how these patterns compare between closely-related consumer species. We conducted field surveys to build 36 quantitative plant-pollinator networks using observation-based and pollen-based records of visitation across the gulf-coast cotton growing region of Texas, US. We focused on two key cotton pollinator species in the region: the social European honey bee, Apis mellifera, and the solitary native long-horned bee, Melissodes tepaneca. We demonstrate that diet breadth is highly context-dependent. Specifically, local factors better explain patterns of diet than regional factors for both species, but A. mellifera and M. tepaneca respond to local factors with contrasting patterns. Despite being collected directly from cotton blooms, both species exhibit significant preferences for non-cotton pollen, indicating a propensity to spend substantial effort foraging on remnant vegetation despite the rarity of these patches in the intensely managed cotton agroecosystem. Overall, our results demonstrate that diet is highly context- and species-dependent and thus an understanding of both factors is key for evaluating the conservation of important cotton pollinators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diet preference; Generality; Network analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31676969     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04543-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  32 in total

1.  Species coextinctions and the biodiversity crisis.

Authors:  Lian Pin Koh; Robert R Dunn; Navjot S Sodhi; Robert K Colwell; Heather C Proctor; Vincent S Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms.

Authors:  Myles H M Menz; Ryan D Phillips; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen; Marcelo A Aizen; Steven D Johnson; Kingsley W Dixon
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 3.  Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers.

Authors:  Dave Goulson; Elizabeth Nicholls; Cristina Botías; Ellen L Rotheray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Wild bees enhance honey bees' pollination of hybrid sunflower.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Neal M Williams; Rachael Winfree; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Specialization: species property or local phenomenon?

Authors:  L R Fox; P A Morrow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-02-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function.

Authors:  Berry J Brosi; Heather M Briggs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Generalist Behavior Describes Pollen Foraging for Perceived Oligolectic and Polylectic Bees.

Authors:  Alan D Ritchie; Rebecca Ruppel; Shalene Jha
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.377

9.  Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss.

Authors:  Riccardo Bommarco; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Birgit Meyer; Simon G Potts; Juha Pöyry; Stuart P M Roberts; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Erik Ockinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Forested landscapes promote richness and abundance of native bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) in Wisconsin apple orchards.

Authors:  J C Watson; A T Wolf; J S Ascher
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.377

View more
  3 in total

1.  Landscape simplification shapes pathogen prevalence in plant-pollinator networks.

Authors:  Laura L Figueroa; Heather Grab; Wee Hao Ng; Christopher R Myers; Peter Graystock; Quinn S McFrederick; Scott H McArt
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Complex floral traits shape pollinator attraction to ornamental plants.

Authors:  E Erickson; R R Junker; J G Ali; N McCartney; H M Patch; C M Grozinger
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.040

3.  Pollinator richness, pollination networks, and diet adjustment along local and landscape gradients of resource diversity.

Authors:  Carmelo Gómez-Martínez; Miguel A González-Estévez; Joana Cursach; Amparo Lázaro
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 6.105

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.