Judith Sebestyen VanSickle1, Tarak Srivastava2, Uttam Garg3, Mohamed H Rezaiekhaligh2, Uri S Alon2. 1. Division of Nephrology, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri at Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA. jvansickle@cmh.edu. 2. Division of Nephrology, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri at Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Road, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri at Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: 25-Hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) is essential for calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. The majority of serum 25(OH)D is bound to vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) (~ 85%) and to albumin (~ 15%), with only a miniscule amount circulating as free 25(OH)D. Free 25(OH)D can be calculated mathematically by Bikle method from the concentrations of total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and albumin or measured directly by ELISA. A direct head-to-head comparison between the two methods has not been done in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The objective of the study was to compare the mathematically calculated versus directly measured free 25(OH) vitamin D in children. Serum samples from 74 children (ages 1-19 years) were simultaneously analyzed for total 25(OH)D, serum albumin, VDBP, and free 25(OH)D. Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate agreement between the two methods. RESULTS: The mean age was 9.1 ± 5.1 years, with 61% boys, 76% Caucasians, and 24% African-Americans. The mean ± SD for total 25(OH)D was 38.7 ± 12.8 ng/mL, bioavailable 25(OH)D 3.1 ± 1.1 ng/mL, mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D 8.4 ± 3.2 pg/mL, and directly measured free 25(OH)D 8.9 ± 3.6 pg/mL. Pearson correlation reflected a significant correlation between mathematically calculated and directly measured free 25(OH)D (r = 0.66, p < 0.0005). Bland-Altman plot reflected a tight agreement within a 95% limit of agreement (mean = - 0.026 ± 2SD). CONCLUSIONS: The directly measured and mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D are in close agreement and are interchangeable. Depending on the local availability of instruments and methods, free 25(OH)D can be either directly measured or mathematically calculated.
INTRODUCTION:25-Hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) is essential for calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. The majority of serum 25(OH)D is bound to vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) (~ 85%) and to albumin (~ 15%), with only a miniscule amount circulating as free 25(OH)D. Free 25(OH)D can be calculated mathematically by Bikle method from the concentrations of total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and albumin or measured directly by ELISA. A direct head-to-head comparison between the two methods has not been done in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The objective of the study was to compare the mathematically calculated versus directly measured free 25(OH) vitamin D in children. Serum samples from 74 children (ages 1-19 years) were simultaneously analyzed for total 25(OH)D, serum albumin, VDBP, and free 25(OH)D. Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate agreement between the two methods. RESULTS: The mean age was 9.1 ± 5.1 years, with 61% boys, 76% Caucasians, and 24% African-Americans. The mean ± SD for total 25(OH)D was 38.7 ± 12.8 ng/mL, bioavailable 25(OH)D 3.1 ± 1.1 ng/mL, mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D 8.4 ± 3.2 pg/mL, and directly measured free 25(OH)D 8.9 ± 3.6 pg/mL. Pearson correlation reflected a significant correlation between mathematically calculated and directly measured free 25(OH)D (r = 0.66, p < 0.0005). Bland-Altman plot reflected a tight agreement within a 95% limit of agreement (mean = - 0.026 ± 2SD). CONCLUSIONS: The directly measured and mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D are in close agreement and are interchangeable. Depending on the local availability of instruments and methods, free 25(OH)D can be either directly measured or mathematically calculated.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone metabolism; Free 25(OH)D; Vitamin D
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Michelle E Danielson; Robert Boudreau; Kamil E Barbour; Mara J Horwitz; Douglas C Bauer; Kristine E Ensrud; JoAnn E Manson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; James M Shikany; Rebecca D Jackson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: J B Schwartz; J Lai; B Lizaola; L Kane; S Markova; P Weyland; N A Terrault; N Stotland; D Bikle Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Michelle R Denburg; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Ian H de Boer; Martin Hewison; Justine Shults; Babette S Zemel; David Stokes; Debbie Foerster; Benjamin Laskin; Anthony Ramirez; Mary B Leonard Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2013-06-02 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Camille E Powe; Catherine Ricciardi; Anders H Berg; Delger Erdenesanaa; Gina Collerone; Elizabeth Ankers; Julia Wenger; S Ananth Karumanchi; Ravi Thadhani; Ishir Bhan Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.741