| Literature DB >> 31676337 |
Israel Higino de Sousa1, Vanessa Niely Soares Campos2, André Alvares Marques Vale3, Vera Lucia Maciel-Silva4, Celisnolia Moraes Leite5, Alberto Jorge Oliveira Lopes6, Penina Sousa Mourão7, Francisco das Chagas Alves Lima7, Alzir Azevedo Batista5, Ana Paula Silva de Azevedo Dos Santos8, Marcio Aurélio Pinheiro Almeida2, Silma Regina Ferreira Pereira9.
Abstract
Ruthenium complexes are being considered as novel chemotherapeutic alternatives for cancer treatment. In our study, we assessed the antitumoral activities of novel ruthenium complexes coupled to the amino acids proline (RuPro) and threonine (RuThr) in prostate tumor cell lines (DU145) and breast (MCF7), and normal cell lines of the lung fibroblast (GM07492A). Our results revealed that the EC50 of the complexes for DU145 and MCF7 was two times lower than that GM07492A. Moreover, RuPro and RuThr were not able to induce significant genomic instability, cell cycle arrest or cell death in GM07492A, but could induce DNA damage, arrest in G2/M and apoptosis in DU145 and MCF7. Furthermore, BAX, TP53 and ATM were found to be upregulated in DU145 and MCF7 treated with RuPro and RuThr, in which, a higher ASCT2 gene expression was also observed. Using molecular docking, RuPro and RuThr interact with ASCT2, suggesting that this transporter might have a pivotal role in the execution of their activities. Hence, our results with RuPro and RuThr are capable of selectively inducing genetic damage, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in DU145 and MCF7. We suggest that the selective action of the RuPro and RuThr complexes is related to the higher expression of ASCT2 in the tumor cells.Entities:
Keywords: Antitumoral; Cell death; Cytotoxicity; Genotoxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31676337 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.104679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol In Vitro ISSN: 0887-2333 Impact factor: 3.500