| Literature DB >> 31676276 |
Virgínia Picanço-Castro1, Pablo Diego Moço2, Amanda Mizukami2, Leticia Delfini Vaz2, Marcelo de Souza Fernandes Pereira2, Renata Nacasaki Silvestre2, Júlia Teixeira Cottas de Azevedo2, Aline de Sousa Bomfim2, Mario Soares de Abreu Neto2, Kelen Cristina Ribeiro Malmegrim3, Kamilla Swiech3, Dimas Tadeu Covas4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Adoptive transfer of T cells expressing a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) has shown impressive response rates for the treatment of CD19 + B-cell malignancies in numerous clinical trials. The CAR molecule, which recognizes cell-surface tumor-associated antigen independently of human leukocyte antigen (HLA), is composed by one or more signaling molecules to activate genetically modified T cells for killing, proliferation, and cytokine production.Entities:
Keywords: CAR-T cells; CD19; Cell expansion; Cytotoxicity; Immunotherapy; In vitro; In vivo xenograft model; Lentiviral vector production
Year: 2019 PMID: 31676276 PMCID: PMC7248496 DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2019.06.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hematol Transfus Cell Ther ISSN: 2531-1379
Figure 1Establishment of improved conditions for lentiviral production. Effect of plasmid ratio on viral production: (A) Viral titer (TU/mL) using different plasmid ratios (transgene:gag-pol:VSV-G:rev). Data presented as mean ± SD, n = 2. Non-significant difference (Mann-Whitney U-test). (B) Effect of viral supernatant harvesting times on Viral titer (TU/mL). Single harvests at 24 and 48 h post-transfection (hpt), and two harvests at 24 and 48 hpt. Data presented as mean ± SD, n = 3. **P < 0.002 (ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak). (C) Effect of transfection agent on Viral titer (TU/mL). Polyethyleneimine (PEI) and Lipofectamine® 2000 (Lipofectamine) were employed in the absence or presence of NaBu (5 mM). Data presented as mean ± SD, number of replicates indicated by number of points, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.002; ***P < 0.0002; ****P < 0.0001 (ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak). (D) Effect of concentration methods on lentiviral recovery. Ultracentrifugation (UC), tangential flow filtration (QuixStand - QS), tangential flow filtration, followed by ultracentrifugation (QS + UC), ultrafiltration by membrane centrifugation (VivaSpin - vs) were employed. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation, number of replicates indicated by the number of points, **P < 0.002; ****P < 0.0001 (ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak).
Quality control of the lentiviral vector produced 24 and 48 h after transfection using a plasmid ratio of 3:1:1:1 (transgene:gag-pol:VSV-G:rev) and lipofectamine. Particle concentration was performed by membrane ultrafiltration (VivaSpin™ 100 kDa, GE Healthcare).
| Parameter | Method | Acceptance Criteria | Batch #1 | Batch #2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lentiviral production (TU) | Flow Cytometry | >1 × 107 | .86 × 109 | 1.1 × 109 |
| Sterility | BacT/Alert | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Mycoplasma | Luminescence-based assay | <1.0 | 0.57 | 0.61 |
| Endotoxin | Portable Test System (PTS) | <5.0 EU/mL | 1.37 | 0.57 |
Figure 2(A) Schematic representation of CD19-CAR-T cells production protocol. (B) Cell growth profile of CD19-CAR-T cells (n = 2) expanded with 100U/mL IL-2. (C) Fold increase in CD19-CAR-T cell number. (D) Percentage of CD19-CAR-T cells expression during the time of culture.
Figure 3(A) Illustrative dot plots of co-cultivation analysis (0 and 24 h) by flow cytometry. Effector cells: non-transduced T cells (T) and CAR-T cells (CAR). Target cells (PKH67+): Sup-B15 (CD19+) and K562 (CD19-). (B) Percentage of target cells (PKH67+) at the beginning and after 24 h of co-cultivation. Data presented as mean ± SD, n = 4. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001 (ANOVA two factors followed by Holm-Sidak). (C) Cytotoxicity percentage calculated by the absorbance related to LDH released in the co-cultures in the 1:1 and 5:1 (effector: targets) proportions. Effector cells: non-transduced T lymphocytes (T) and CAR-T lymphocytes (CAR). Sup-B15 (CD19 +) and K562 (CD19-) target cells. Data presented as mean ± SD, n = 3. ****P < 0.0001 (ANOVA two factors followed by Holm–Sidak).
Figure 4Evaluation of CD19-CAR-T cells infusion in a xenograft mouse model. (A) Upper panel shows a timeline of experimental design. On day 0, NSG mice were injected intravenously with 5 × 106 Raji-Luc + cells. On day 11, the mice received 1 × 106 CD19-CAR-T cells or PBS. (B) Bioluminescent imaging pre-treatment (Day 5), and on day 11, intravenous injection of CD19-CAR-T cells or PBS. Disease progression was followed until day 50. (C) Tumor volume monitoring in treated and control mice.