Literature DB >> 31676240

Computer-assisted EEG diagnostic review for idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

Shannon Clarke1, Philippa J Karoly2, Ewan Nurse3, Udaya Seneviratne4, Janelle Taylor5, Rory Knight-Sadler5, Robert Kerr5, Braden Moore5, Patrick Hennessy5, Dulini Mendis5, Claire Lim6, Jake Miles6, Mark Cook7, Dean R Freestone5, Wendyl D'Souza6.   

Abstract

Epilepsy diagnosis can be costly, time-consuming, and not uncommonly inaccurate. The reference standard diagnostic monitoring is continuous video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, ideally capturing all events or concordant interictal discharges. Automating EEG data review would save time and resources, thus enabling more people to receive reference standard monitoring and also potentially heralding a more quantitative approach to therapeutic outcomes. There is substantial research into the automated detection of seizures and epileptic activity from EEG. However, automated detection software is not widely used in the clinic, and despite numerous published algorithms, few methods have regulatory approval for detecting epileptic activity from EEG. This study reports on a deep learning algorithm for computer-assisted EEG review. Deep convolutional neural networks were trained to detect epileptic discharges using a preexisting dataset of over 6000 labelled events in a cohort of 103 patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). Patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory outpatient EEG, and all data were curated and confirmed independently by two epilepsy specialists (Seneviratne et al., 2016). The resulting automated detection algorithm was then used to review diagnostic scalp EEG for seven patients (four with IGE and three with events mimicking seizures) to validate performance in a clinical setting. The automated detection algorithm showed state-of-the-art performance for detecting epileptic activity from clinical EEG, with mean sensitivity of >95% and corresponding mean false positive rate of 1 detection per minute. Importantly, diagnostic case studies showed that the automated detection algorithm reduced human review time by 80%-99%, without compromising event detection or diagnostic accuracy. The presented results demonstrate that computer-assisted review can increase the speed and accuracy of EEG assessment and has the potential to greatly improve therapeutic outcomes. This article is part of the Special Issue "NEWroscience 2018".
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated review; Electroencephalography; Epileptic spike; Idiopathic generalized epilepsy; Seizure detection

Year:  2019        PMID: 31676240     DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  4 in total

1.  Automated Detection of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges from Scalp Electroencephalograms by Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  John Thomas; Jing Jin; Prasanth Thangavel; Elham Bagheri; Rajamanickam Yuvaraj; Justin Dauwels; Rahul Rathakrishnan; Jonathan J Halford; Sydney S Cash; Brandon Westover
Journal:  Int J Neural Syst       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 5.866

2.  Classification with a Deferral Option and Low-Trust Filtering for Automated Seizure Detection.

Authors:  Thijs Becker; Kaat Vandecasteele; Christos Chatzichristos; Wim Van Paesschen; Dirk Valkenborg; Sabine Van Huffel; Maarten De Vos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Prediction Value of Epilepsy Secondary to Inferior Cavity Hemorrhage Based on Scalp EEG Wave Pattern in Deep Learning.

Authors:  Shishuang Jiang; Xuenong He
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Permutation Entropy-Based Interpretability of Convolutional Neural Network Models for Interictal EEG Discrimination of Subjects with Epileptic Seizures vs. Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures.

Authors:  Michele Lo Giudice; Giuseppe Varone; Cosimo Ieracitano; Nadia Mammone; Giovanbattista Gaspare Tripodi; Edoardo Ferlazzo; Sara Gasparini; Umberto Aguglia; Francesco Carlo Morabito
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.524

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.