Literature DB >> 31676222

Odanacatib for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: results of the LOFT multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and LOFT Extension study.

Michael R McClung1, Michelle L O'Donoghue2, Socrates E Papapoulos3, Henry Bone4, Bente Langdahl5, Kenneth G Saag6, Ian R Reid7, Douglas P Kiel8, Ilaria Cavallari2, Marc P Bonaca2, Stephen D Wiviott2, Tobias de Villiers9, Xu Ling10, Kurt Lippuner11, Toshitaka Nakamura12, Jean-Yves Reginster13, Jose Adolfo Rodriguez-Portales14, Christian Roux15, José Zanchetta16, Cristiano A F Zerbini17, Jeong-Gun Park2, KyungAh Im2, Abby Cange2, Laura T Grip2, Norman Heyden18, Carolyn DaSilva18, Dosinda Cohn18, Rachid Massaad18, Boyd B Scott18, Nadia Verbruggen18, Deborah Gurner18, Deborah L Miller18, Micki L Blair18, Adam B Polis18, S Aubrey Stoch18, Arthur Santora18, Antonio Lombardi18, Albert T Leung18, Keith D Kaufman19, Marc S Sabatine2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor, reduces bone resorption while maintaining bone formation. Previous work has shown that odanacatib increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of odanacatib to reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
METHODS: The Long-term Odanacatib Fracture Trial (LOFT) was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven study at 388 outpatient clinics in 40 countries. Eligible participants were women aged at least 65 years who were postmenopausal for 5 years or more, with a femoral neck or total hip bone mineral density T-score between -2·5 and -4·0 if no previous radiographic vertebral fracture, or between -1·5 and -4·0 with a previous vertebral fracture. Women with a previous hip fracture, more than one vertebral fracture, or a T-score of less than -4·0 at the total hip or femoral neck were not eligible unless they were unable or unwilling to use approved osteoporosis treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either oral odanacatib (50 mg once per week) or matching placebo. Randomisation was done using an interactive voice recognition system after stratification for previous radiographic vertebral fracture, and treatment was masked to study participants, investigators and their staff, and sponsor personnel. If the study completed before 5 years of double-blind treatment, consenting participants could enrol in a double-blind extension study (LOFT Extension), continuing their original treatment assignment for up to 5 years from randomisation. Primary endpoints were incidence of vertebral fractures as assessed using radiographs collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months, yearly, and at final study visit in participants for whom evaluable radiograph images were available at baseline and at least one other timepoint, and hip and non-vertebral fractures adjudicated as being a result of osteoporosis as assessed by clinical history and radiograph. Safety was assessed in participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The adjudicated cardiovascular safety endpoints were a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter. Individual cardiovascular endpoints and death were also assessed. LOFT and LOFT Extension are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00529373) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT number 2007-002693-66).
FINDINGS: Between Sept 14, 2007, and Nov 17, 2009, we randomly assigned 16 071 evaluable patients to treatment: 8043 to odanacatib and 8028 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 36·5 months (IQR 34·43-40·15) 4297 women assigned to odanacatib and 3960 assigned to placebo enrolled in LOFT Extension (total median follow-up 47·6 months, IQR 35·45-60·06). In LOFT, cumulative incidence of primary outcomes for odanacatib versus placebo were: radiographic vertebral fractures 3·7% (251/6770) versus 7·8% (542/6910), hazard ratio (HR) 0·46, 95% CI 0·40-0·53; hip fractures 0·8% (65/8043) versus 1·6% (125/8028), 0·53, 0·39-0·71; non-vertebral fractures 5·1% (412/8043) versus 6·7% (541/8028), 0·77, 0·68-0·87; all p<0·0001. Combined results from LOFT plus LOFT Extension for cumulative incidence of primary outcomes for odanacatib versus placebo were: radiographic vertebral fractures 4·9% (341/6909) versus 9·6% (675/7011), HR 0·48, 95% CI 0·42-0·55; hip fractures 1·1% (86/8043) versus 2·0% (162/8028), 0·52, 0·40-0·67; non-vertebral fractures 6·4% (512/8043) versus 8·4% (675/8028), 0·74, 0·66-0·83; all p<0·0001. In LOFT, the composite cardiovascular endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 273 (3·4%) of 8043 patients in the odanacatib group versus 245 (3·1%) of 8028 in the placebo group (HR 1·12, 95% CI 0·95-1·34; p=0·18). New-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter occurred in 112 (1·4%) of 8043 patients in the odanacatib group versus 96 (1·2%) of 8028 in the placebo group (HR 1·18, 0·90-1·55; p=0·24). Odanacatib was associated with an increased risk of stroke (1·7% [136/8043] vs 1·3% [104/8028], HR 1·32, 1·02-1·70; p=0·034), but not myocardial infarction (0·7% [60/8043] vs 0·9% [74/8028], HR 0·82, 0·58-1·15; p=0·26). The HR for all-cause mortality was 1·13 (5·0% [401/8043] vs 4·4% [356/8028], 0·98-1·30; p=0·10). When data from LOFT Extension were included, the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in significantly more patients in the odanacatib group than in the placebo group (401 [5·0%] of 8043 vs 343 [4·3%] of 8028, HR 1·17, 1·02-1·36; p=0·029, as did stroke (2·3% [187/8043] vs 1·7% [137/8028], HR 1·37, 1·10-1·71; p=0·0051).
INTERPRETATION: Odanacatib reduced the risk of fracture, but was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, specifically stroke, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Based on the overall balance between benefit and risk, the study's sponsor decided that they would no longer pursue development of odanacatib for treatment of osteoporosis. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31676222     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30346-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol        ISSN: 2213-8587            Impact factor:   32.069


  38 in total

Review 1.  Drug Treatment of Low Bone Mass and Other Bone Conditions in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Stefania Costi; Teresa Giani; Francesco Orsini; Rolando Cimaz
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Novel insights into the coupling of osteoclasts and resorption to bone formation.

Authors:  Margaret M Durdan; Ruth D Azaria; Megan M Weivoda
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Validation of the Surrogate Threshold Effect for Change in Bone Mineral Density as a Surrogate Endpoint for Fracture Outcomes: The FNIH-ASBMR SABRE Project.

Authors:  Richard Eastell; Eric Vittinghoff; Li-Yung Lui; Charles E McCulloch; Imre Pavo; Arkadi Chines; Sundeep Khosla; Jane A Cauley; Bruce Mitlak; Douglas C Bauer; Mary Bouxsein; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.390

Review 4.  Bone remodeling: an operational process ensuring survival and bone mechanical competence.

Authors:  Simona Bolamperti; Isabella Villa; Alessandro Rubinacci
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.362

5.  Peptidomimetic nitrile warheads as SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Bing Bai; Elena Arutyunova; Muhammad Bashir Khan; Jimmy Lu; Michael A Joyce; Holly A Saffran; Justin A Shields; Appan Srinivas Kandadai; Alexandr Belovodskiy; Mostofa Hena; Wayne Vuong; Tess Lamer; Howard S Young; John C Vederas; D Lorne Tyrrell; M Joanne Lemieux; James A Nieman
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-08-20

6.  Curcumin inhibits the migration of osteoclast precursors and osteoclastogenesis by repressing CCL3 production.

Authors:  Zhengeng Liang; Yan Xue; Tao Wang; Qi Xie; Jiafu Lin; Yu Wang
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2020-07-23

7.  MiR-16-5p regulates postmenopausal osteoporosis by directly targeting VEGFA.

Authors:  Tao Yu; Xiaomeng You; Haichao Zhou; Wenbao He; Zihua Li; Bing Li; Jiang Xia; Hui Zhu; Youguang Zhao; Guangrong Yu; Yuan Xiong; Yunfeng Yang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 8.  Chemical Aspects of Human and Environmental Overload with Fluorine.

Authors:  Jianlin Han; Loránd Kiss; Haibo Mei; Attila Márió Remete; Maja Ponikvar-Svet; Daniel Mark Sedgwick; Raquel Roman; Santos Fustero; Hiroki Moriwaki; Vadim A Soloshonok
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 9.  Role of Biomolecules in Osteoclasts and Their Therapeutic Potential for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Suryaji Patil; Fang Xu; Xiao Lin; Airong Qian
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 10.  Cardiovascular Safety of Antifracture Medications in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Narrative Review of Evidence From Randomized Studies.

Authors:  Alexander J Rodríguez; Bo Abrahamsen
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.