Literature DB >> 31676157

Comparison of estimated norovirus infection risk reductions for a single fomite contact scenario with residual and nonresidual hand sanitizers.

Amanda M Wilson1, Kelly A Reynolds2, Lee-Ann Jaykus3, Blanca Escudero-Abarca3, Charles P Gerba4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to relate experimentally measured log10 human norovirus reductions for a nonresidual (60% ethanol) and a residual (quaternary ammonium-based) hand sanitizer to infection risk reductions.
METHODS: Human norovirus log10 reductions on hands for both sanitizers were experimentally measured using the ASTM International Standard E1838-10 method, with modification. Scenarios included product application to: (1) inoculated fingerpads with 30- and 60-second contact times, and (2) hands followed by inoculation with human norovirus immediately and 4 hours later. Hand sanitizer efficacies were used in a mathematical model estimating norovirus infection risk from a single hand-to-fomite contact under low and high environmental contamination conditions.
RESULTS: The largest log10 reductions for the residual and nonresidual hand sanitizers were for a 60-second contact time, reducing infection risk by approximately 99% and 85%, respectively. Four hours after application, the residual hand sanitizer reduced infection risks by 78.5% under high contamination conditions, whereas the nonresidual hand sanitizer offered no reduction. DISCUSSION: Log10 virus and infection risk reductions were consistently greater for the residual hand sanitizer under all scenarios. Further data describing residual hand sanitizer efficacy with additional contamination or tactile events are needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Residual antinoroviral hand sanitizers may reduce infection risks for up to 4 hours.
Copyright © 2019 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hand sanitizer; Norovirus; Risk reduction; Risk target

Year:  2019        PMID: 31676157     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  4 in total

1.  Quantitative microbial risk assessment of human norovirus infection in environmental service workers due to healthcare-associated fomites.

Authors:  K N Overbey; G B Hamra; K E Nachman; C Rock; K J Schwab
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Comparing approaches for modelling indirect contact transmission of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Amanda M Wilson; Mark H Weir; Marco-Felipe King; Rachael M Jones
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Effects of patient room layout on viral accruement on healthcare professionals' hands.

Authors:  Amanda M Wilson; Marco-Felipe King; Martín López-García; Ian J Clifton; Jessica Proctor; Kelly A Reynolds; Catherine J Noakes
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.554

4.  Modeling fomite-mediated SARS-CoV-2 exposure through personal protective equipment doffing in a hospital environment.

Authors:  Marco-Felipe King; Amanda M Wilson; Mark H Weir; Martín López-García; Jessica Proctor; Waseem Hiwar; Amirul Khan; Louise A Fletcher; P Andrew Sleigh; Ian Clifton; Stephanie J Dancer; Mark Wilcox; Kelly A Reynolds; Catherine J Noakes
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 6.554

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.