| Literature DB >> 31675254 |
Arne Åsberg1, Gustav Mikkelsen1,2, Ingrid Hov Odsæter1,2.
Abstract
Clinical utility of a diagnostic test depends on its diagnostic accuracy, the pretest probability of disease and the clinical consequences of the test results. Tools for evaluating clinical utility are scarce. We propose a new clinical utility index (CUI), which is the expected gain in utility (EGU) of the test divided by the EGU of an ideal test, both adjusted for EGU of the optimal clinical action without testing. The index expresses the relative benefit of using the test compared to using an optimal test when making a clinical decision. To illustrate how the index may be used, we estimated CUI for fasting glucose, both as a continuous and as a dichotomous test, at several values of pretest probability of diabetes mellitus and at two levels of cost/benefit-ratio. In the same clinical situations we also estimated CUI for the 2 h glucose tolerance test. Hemoglobin A1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol was used as a reference standard for diabetes mellitus. In this model, fasting glucose was clinically more useful as a continuous test than as a dichotomous one, based on CUIs. At pretest probability above the treatment threshold, fasting glucose as a continuous test was even more useful than the complete glucose tolerance test. These results are not necessarily generalizable; however, they show how the CUI can be used to select the most useful test in certain clinical situations.Entities:
Keywords: Cost benefit analysis; ROC analysis; error, diagnostic; logistic regression; sensitivity; specificity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31675254 DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2019.1677938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scand J Clin Lab Invest ISSN: 0036-5513 Impact factor: 1.713