Literature DB >> 31675254

A new index of clinical utility for diagnostic tests.

Arne Åsberg1, Gustav Mikkelsen1,2, Ingrid Hov Odsæter1,2.   

Abstract

Clinical utility of a diagnostic test depends on its diagnostic accuracy, the pretest probability of disease and the clinical consequences of the test results. Tools for evaluating clinical utility are scarce. We propose a new clinical utility index (CUI), which is the expected gain in utility (EGU) of the test divided by the EGU of an ideal test, both adjusted for EGU of the optimal clinical action without testing. The index expresses the relative benefit of using the test compared to using an optimal test when making a clinical decision. To illustrate how the index may be used, we estimated CUI for fasting glucose, both as a continuous and as a dichotomous test, at several values of pretest probability of diabetes mellitus and at two levels of cost/benefit-ratio. In the same clinical situations we also estimated CUI for the 2 h glucose tolerance test. Hemoglobin A1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol was used as a reference standard for diabetes mellitus. In this model, fasting glucose was clinically more useful as a continuous test than as a dichotomous one, based on CUIs. At pretest probability above the treatment threshold, fasting glucose as a continuous test was even more useful than the complete glucose tolerance test. These results are not necessarily generalizable; however, they show how the CUI can be used to select the most useful test in certain clinical situations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost benefit analysis; ROC analysis; error, diagnostic; logistic regression; sensitivity; specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31675254     DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2019.1677938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic Accuracy with Total Adenosine Deaminase as a Biomarker for Discriminating Pleural Transudates and Exudates in a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bernardo Henrique Ferraz Maranhão; Cyro Teixeira da Silva Junior; Jorge Luiz Barillo; Carmem Lucia Teixeira de Castro; Joeber Bernardo Soares de Souza; Patricia Siqueira Silva; Roberto Stirbulov
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.434

2.  Dynamic monitoring of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 and inflammation-based indices in patients with advanced colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nebojsa Manojlovic; Goran Savic; Bojan Nikolic; Nemanja Rancic
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of CO-RADS in patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease-2019: A single center experience.

Authors:  Joao Guilherme Boaretto Guimaraes; Gabriel Lucca de Oliveira Salvador; Carolina Lobo Papp; Adrian Sobreiro Leal Boica; Andressa Borges Bittencourt; Isabela Fernanda Rohde Grandi; Kelvin Suckow; Vinicius Ribas Fonseca
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.420

4.  Evaluation of risk stratification strategies in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Keegan Peter Janssens; Cristina Ortiz Sobrinho Valete; André Ricardo Araújo da Silva; Sima Esther Ferman
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.990

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.