Literature DB >> 31675189

Three-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.

Vanessa C Ruschel1, Sheila C Stolf1, Shizuma Shibata2, Yunro Chung3, Lee W Boushell4, Luiz N Baratieri1, Ricardo Walter5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of universal adhesives containing different monomers, namely 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP) and dipentaerythritol penta-acrylate monophosphate (PENTA), in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).
METHODS: This was a randomized controlled clinical trial involving 63 subjects in need of restorations of 203 NCCLs. Notch-shaped lesions were restored with Kalore (GC Corporation) after application of Scotchbond Universal (SU) or Prime&Bond Elect (PBE) following the etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etch (SE) technique. Restorations were assessed after 1 week, 18 and 36 months. Logistic regression was performed for each outcome separately with compound symmetric variance-covariance structure assumed to consider a correlation of restorations within subjects. All analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS).
RESULTS: 150 teeth in 41 subjects were assessed at 36 months. Three restorations in the PBE_SE group failed the retention criterium. Statistically significant differences were reached for the following comparisons: restorations with SU_SE were 75% less likely to maintain a score of Alfa for marginal discoloration than PBE_SE; restorations with PBE_SE were 83% less likely to maintain a score of Alfa for marginal adaptation than PBE_ER. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: More than 20% of restorations restored with universal adhesives developed marginal degradation after 36 months. The impact of phosphoric acid on the restoration seems to be material-dependent. Copyright©American Journal of Dentistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31675189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  5 in total

1.  Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcos O Barceleiro; Leticia S Lopes; Chane Tardem; Fernanda S Calazans; Thalita P Matos; Alessandra Reis; Abraham Lincoln Calixto; Alessandro D Loguercio
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Two-year randomized clinical trial of different restorative techniques in non-carious cervical lesions and MMP activity in gingival crevicular fluid.

Authors:  Rafael Simões Gonçalves; Polliana Mendes Candia Scaffa; Mirela Sanae Shinohara; Paulo Roberto Marão de Andrade Carvalho; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf; Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Universal Adhesives and Adhesion Modes in Non-Carious Cervical Restorations: 2-Year Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Patricia Manarte-Monteiro; Joana Domingues; Liliana Teixeira; Sandra Gavinha; Maria Conceição Manso
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.329

4.  Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a new universal adhesive applied in the "no-waiting" technique: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Rossana Aboud Matos de Almeida; Suellen Nogueira Linares Lima; Maria Vitória Nassif; Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos; Thalita Paris de Matos; Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez; Andres Felipe Millan Cardenas; Matheus Coelho Bandeca; Alessandro D Loguercio
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Adam Wawrzynkiewicz; Wioletta Rozpedek-Kaminska; Grzegorz Galita; Monika Lukomska-Szymanska; Barbara Lapinska; Jerzy Sokolowski; Ireneusz Majsterek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.