Literature DB >> 31674798

An automated approach for the optimised estimation of breast density with Dixon methods.

Rosie Goodburn1, Evanthia Kousi1, Alison Macdonald2, Veronica Morgan2, Erica Scurr2, Mamatha Reddy3, Louise Wilkinson3, Elizabeth O'Flynn2, Romney Pope2, Steven Allen2, Maria Angélica Schmidt1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present and evaluate an automated method to correct scaling between Dixon water/fat images used in breast density (BD) assessments.
METHODS: Dixon images were acquired in 14 subjects with different T1 weightings (flip angles, FA, 4°/16°). Our method corrects intensity differences between water (W) and fat (F) images via the application of a uniform scaling factor (SF), determined subject-by-subject. Based on the postulation that optimal SFs yield relatively featureless summed fat/scaled-water (F+WSF) images, each SF was chosen as that which generated the lowest 95th-percentile in the absolute spatial-gradient image-volume of F+WSF . Water-fraction maps were calculated for data acquired with low/high FAs, and BD (%) was the total percentage water within each breast volume.
RESULTS: Corrected/uncorrected BD ranged from, respectively, 10.9-71.8%/8.9-66.7% for low-FA data to 8.1-74.3%/5.6-54.3% for high-FA data. Corrected metrics had an average absolute increase in BD of 6.4% for low-FA data and 18.4% for high-FA data. BD values estimated from low- and high-FA data were closer following SF-correction.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate need for scaling in such BD assessments, where our method brought high-FA and low-FA data into closer agreement. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We demonstrated a feasible method to address a main source of inaccuracy in Dixon-based BD measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31674798      PMCID: PMC7055430          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  13 in total

Review 1.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Fat quantification with IDEAL gradient echo imaging: correction of bias from T(1) and noise.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Liu; Charles A McKenzie; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Zheng Zhang; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano; Richard G Barr; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Mary C Mahoney; W Phil Evans; Linda H Larsen; Marilyn J Morton; Ellen B Mendelson; Dione M Farria; Jean B Cormack; Helga S Marques; Amanda Adams; Nolin M Yeh; Glenna Gabrielli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Simple proton spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  W T Dixon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Man-Kwun I Chau; Hon J Yu; Shadfar Bahri; Tiffany Tseng; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michael Khazen; Ruth M L Warren; Caroline R M Boggis; Emilie C Bryant; Sadie Reed; Iqbal Warsi; Linda J Pointon; Gek E Kwan-Lim; Deborah Thompson; Ros Eeles; Doug Easton; D Gareth Evans; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Norman Boyd; Lisa Martin; Sofia Chavez; Anoma Gunasekara; Ayesha Salleh; Olga Melnichouk; Martin Yaffe; Christine Friedenreich; Salomon Minkin; Michael Bronskill
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Peggy L Porter; Constance Lehman; Stephen H Taplin; Emily White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Breast MRI segmentation for density estimation: Do different methods give the same results and how much do differences matter?

Authors:  Simon J Doran; John H Hipwell; Rachel Denholm; Björn Eiben; Marta Busana; David J Hawkes; Martin O Leach; Isabel Dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Comparison of Dixon Sequences for Estimation of Percent Breast Fibroglandular Tissue.

Authors:  Araminta E W Ledger; Erica D Scurr; Julie Hughes; Alison Macdonald; Toni Wallace; Karen Thomas; Robin Wilson; Martin O Leach; Maria A Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Volumetric breast density estimation on MRI using explainable deep learning regression.

Authors:  Bas H M van der Velden; Markus H A Janse; Max A A Ragusi; Claudette E Loo; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.