Literature DB >> 31674648

What Is the Evidence to Support a Correlate of Protection for Measles? A Systematic Review.

Shelly Bolotin1,2,3, Stephanie L Hughes1, Nazish Gul1, Sumaiya Khan1, Paul A Rota4, Alberto Severini5,6, Susan Hahné7, Andrea Tricco2,8, William J Moss9, Walter Orenstein10, Nikki Turner11, David Durrheim12, Jane M Heffernan13, Natasha Crowcroft1,2,3,14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies assume that the serologic correlate of protection from measles disease is 120 mIU/mL. We systematically reviewed the literature to examine the evidence supporting this correlate of protection.
METHODS: We searched peer-reviewed and gray literature for articles reporting a measles correlate of protection. We excluded studies focusing on special populations, infants aged <9 months, and those using animal models or nonstandard vaccines or administration routes. We extracted and synthesized data from full-text articles that met inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: We screened 14 778 articles and included 5 studies in our review. The studies reported either preexposure antibody concentrations of individuals along with a description of symptoms postexposure, or the proportion of measles cases that had preexposure antibody concentrations above a threshold of immunity specified by the authors. Some studies also described secondary antibody responses upon exposure. The variation in laboratory methods between studies made comparisons difficult. Some of the studies that assumed 120 mIU/mL as a correlate of protection identified symptomatic individuals with preexposure titers exceeding this threshold.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the scant data upon which the commonly used 120 mIU/mL measles threshold of protection is based, suggesting that further work is required to characterize the measles immunity threshold. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Public Health Ontario, 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  correlate of protection; measles immunity; systematic review; threshold of protection

Year:  2020        PMID: 31674648     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  6 in total

1.  Identifying immunity gaps for measles using Belgian serial serology data.

Authors:  Julie Schenk; Steven Abrams; Amber Litzroth; Laura Cornelissen; Tine Grammens; Heidi Theeten; Niel Hens
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 2.  Does infection with or vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 lead to lasting immunity?

Authors:  Gregory Milne; Thomas Hames; Chris Scotton; Nick Gent; Alexander Johnsen; Roy M Anderson; Tom Ward
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 30.700

3.  Seroepidemiologic Study Designs for Determining SARS-COV-2 Transmission and Immunity.

Authors:  Hannah Clapham; James Hay; Isobel Routledge; Saki Takahashi; Marc Choisy; Derek Cummings; Bryan Grenfell; C Jessica E Metcalf; Michael Mina; Isabel Rodriguez Barraquer; Henrik Salje; Clarence C Tam
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 4.  Correlates of Vaccine-Induced Protection against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Till Koch; Sibylle C Mellinghoff; Parichehr Shamsrizi; Marylyn M Addo; Christine Dahlke
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10

5.  Measles Serosurveys: A Solution in Search of the Right Problem.

Authors:  Archchun Ariyarajah; Natasha S Crowcroft
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-07-15

6.  A challenging modified measles outbreak in vaccinated healthcare providers.

Authors:  Omar Zmerli; Amanda Chamieh; Eliane Maasri; Eid Azar; Claude Afif
Journal:  Infect Prev Pract       Date:  2020-12-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.