| Literature DB >> 31674170 |
Hyunkyung Cha1,2, Yoonjae Song1, Yun Jung Bae3, Tae-Bin Won1,2, Jeong-Whun Kim1, Sung-Woo Cho1, Chae-Seo Rhee1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of maxillary sinus fungus ball (MFB) to increase the preoperative diagnostic accuracy.Entities:
Keywords: Maxillary Sinus; Mycetoma; Sinusitis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31674170 PMCID: PMC7248610 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2019.00836
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1976-8710 Impact factor: 3.372
Fig. 1.Representative radiological findings. (A) Irregular lobulated protruding lesion (fuzzy appearance). (B) Maxillary sinus full haziness without mass effect. (C) Maxillary sinus full haziness with mass effect. (D) Others (mucosal thickening in this case).
Fig. 2.Enrollment flowchart. ESS, endoscopic sinus surgery; CRS, chronic rhinosinusitis; CMS, chronic maxillary sinusitis; MFB, maxillary sinus fungus ball. a)Postoperative maxillary cyst, inverted papilloma, malignant tumor, or antrochoanal polyps, etc.
Demographic characteristics
| Variable | Total (n=247) | MFB (n=179) | CMS (n=68) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 57.5±15.8 | 61.1±13.4 | 48.2±17.9 | <0.001 |
| Male | 94 (38.1) | 57 (31.8) | 37 (54.4) | 0.002 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 12 (4.9) | 10 (5.6) | 2 (2.9) | 0.520 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
MFB, maxillary sinus fungus ball; CMS, chronic maxillary sinusitis.
Radiologic findings
| Variable | MFB (n=179) | CMS (n=68) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intralesional hyperdensity | 134 (74.9) | 0 | <0.001 |
| Fuzzy appearance | 55 (69.1) | 5 (7.4) | <0.001 |
| Full haziness without mass effect[ | 20 (11.2) | 10 (14.7) | 0.513 |
| Full haziness with mass effect | 60 (33.5) | 6 (8.8) | <0.001 |
| Others[ | 45 (25.1) | 46 (67.6) | <0.001 |
Values are presented as number (%).
MFB, maxillary sinus fungus ball; CMS, chronic maxillary sinusitis.
Mass effect was defined as the presence of widening of the ostiomeatal unit or thinning of the maxillary sinus wall.
Others include smooth protruding lesions like mucosal thickening and fluid collection.
Multivariate analysis of clinical characteristics associated with maxillary fungal ball
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Radiological finding | ||
| Intralesional hyperdensity | 295.567 (39.226–37,922.870) | <0.001 |
| Lobulated protruding lesion | 9.519 (3.228–32.078) | <0.001 |
| Mass effect | 7.140 (2.476–22.781) | <0.001 |
| Demographic characteristics | ||
| Sex | 1.008 (0.416–2.451) | 0.985 |
| Age | 1.028 (1.002–1.056) | 0.032 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 3.Regression tree model for diagnosis. (A) Model 1. (B) Model 2. (C) Model 3. Model 1 only involved intralesional hyperdensity as a variable; model 2 added demographic data; and model 3 included intralesional hyperdensity and demographic data, as well as radiological features (lobulated protruding lesion and full haziness with mass effect). Model 1: area under the curve, 0.853; accuracy, 81.78%; model 2: 0.880, 79.76%; model 3: 0.904, 88.66%, respectively. MFB, maxillary sinus fungus ball; CMS, chronic maxillary sinusitis.
Regression tree analysis of each model
| Model | AUC | Specificity | Sensitivity | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.853 | 1 | 0.749 | 1 | 0.602 |
| 2 | 0.880 | 0.647 | 0.855 | 0.864 | 0.629 |
| 3 | 0.904 | 0.838 | 0.905 | 0.936 | 0.770 |
AUC, area under the curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.