Literature DB >> 31673946

Intraoperative core temperature monitoring: accuracy and precision of zero-heat flux heated controlled servo sensor compared with esophageal temperature during major surgery; the ESOSPOT study.

Elena Morettini1, Francesca Turchini2, Lorenzo Tofani3, Gianluca Villa4, Zaccaria Ricci5, Stefano Romagnoli2,4.   

Abstract

Monitoring of intraoperative core temperature is strongly recommended to reduce the risk of perioperative thermic imbalance and related complications. The zero-heat-flux sensor (3M Bair Hugger Temperature monitoring system, ZHF), measures core temperature in a non-invasive manner. This study was aimed at comparing accuracy and precision of the ZHF sensor compared to the esophageal thermometer. Patients scheduled for major elective abdominal or urologic surgery were considered eligible for enrollment. Core body temperature was measured using both an esophageal probe (TESO) and a ZHF sensor (TZHF) every 15 min from induction until the end of general anaesthesia. A Bland-Altman plot for repeated measures was performed. The proportion of measurements within ± 0.5 °C was estimated; from a clinical point of view, a proportion greater than 90% was considered sufficiently accurate. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for repeated measures were calculated. To evaluate association between the two methods, a generalized estimating equation (GEE) simple linear regression model, was elaborated. A GEE multiple regression model was also performed in order to adjust the estimate of the association between measurements from surgical and patient's features. Ninety-nine patients were enrolled. Bland-Altman plot bias was 0.005 °C with upper and lower limits of agreement for repeated measures of 0.50 °C and - 0.49 °C. The percentage of measurements within 0.5 °C of the reference value was 97.98% (95% confidence interval 92.89-99.75%), indicating a clinically sufficient agreement between the two methods. This was also confirmed by a CCC for repeated measures of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.94). The GEE simple regression model (slope value of 0.77) was not significantly influenced by any patient or surgical variables. According to GEE multiple regression model results, the explored patient- and surgery-related variables did not influence the association between methods. ZHF sensor has shown a clinically acceptable accuracy and precision for body core temperature monitoring during elective major surgery. CLINICAL TRIALS: Clinical trial number: NCT03820232.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body core temperature; Esophageal temperature probe; Intraoperative core temperature monitoring; Non-invasive core temperature monitoring method; Zero heat flux sensor

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31673946     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00410-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the novel non-invasive zero-heat-flux Tcore™ thermometer in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  José A Sastre; María J Pascual; Teresa López
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Nitrous oxide decreases the threshold for vasoconstriction less than sevoflurane or isoflurane.

Authors:  M Ozaki; D I Sessler; H Suzuki; K Ozaki; C Tsunoda; K Atarashi
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Mild hypothermia alters propofol pharmacokinetics and increases the duration of action of atracurium.

Authors:  K Leslie; D I Sessler; A R Bjorksten; A Moayeri
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Unintentional perioperative hypothermia is associated with severe complications and high mortality in elective operations.

Authors:  Adrian T Billeter; Samuel F Hohmann; Devin Druen; Robert Cannon; Hiram C Polk
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.982

  4 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy and precision of zero-heat-flux temperature measurements with the 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron Conway; Megan Bittner; Dan Phan; Kristina Chang; Navpreet Kamboj; Elizabeth Tipton; Matteo Parotto
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Development of local guidelines to prevent perioperative hypothermia in children: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Rehena Sultana; John C Allen; Yew Nam Siow; Choon Looi Bong; Shu Ying Lee
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 6.713

3.  Evaluation of the Temple Touch Pro™ noninvasive core-temperature monitoring system in 100 adults under general anesthesia: a prospective comparison with esophageal temperature.

Authors:  Anselm Bräuer; Albulena Fazliu; Ivo F Brandes; Falk Vollnhals; Rolf Grote; Matthias Menzel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.977

4.  Optical Monitoring of Breathing Patterns and Tissue Oxygenation: A Potential Application in COVID-19 Screening and Monitoring.

Authors:  Aaron James Mah; Thien Nguyen; Leili Ghazi Zadeh; Atrina Shadgan; Kosar Khaksari; Mehdi Nourizadeh; Ali Zaidi; Soongho Park; Amir H Gandjbakhche; Babak Shadgan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Zero-Heat-Flux and Esophageal Temperature Monitoring in Orthopedic Surgery: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Judy Munday; Niall Higgins; Lee Jones; Dimitrios Vagenas; André Van Zundert; Samantha Keogh
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-07-12

6.  Studying the Accuracy and Function of Different Thermometry Techniques for Measuring Body Temperature.

Authors:  Aaron James Mah; Leili Ghazi Zadeh; Mahta Khoshnam Tehrani; Shahbaz Askari; Amir H Gandjbakhche; Babak Shadgan
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.