Francesca Pagano1, Vittorio Picchio2, Isotta Chimenti2,3, Alessia Sordano2, Elena De Falco2,3, Mariangela Peruzzi3, Fabio Miraldi4, Elena Cavarretta2,3, Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai2,3, Sebastiano Sciarretta2,5, Giacomo Frati2,5, Antonino G M Marullo2. 1. Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Corso della Repubblica 79, 04100, Latina, Italy. francesca.pagano@uniroma1.it. 2. Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Corso della Repubblica 79, 04100, Latina, Italy. 3. Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy. 4. Department of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrological, Anesthesiological, and Geriatric Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy. 5. Department of AngioCardioNeurology, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac regenerative medicine is a field bridging together biotechnology and surgical science. In this review, we present the explored surgical roads to cell delivery and the known effects of each delivery method on cell therapy efficiency. We also list the more recent clinical trials, exploring the safety and efficacy of delivery routes used for cardiac cell therapy approaches. RECENT FINDINGS: There is no consensus in defining which way is the most suitable for the delivery of the different therapeutic cell types to the damaged heart tissue. In addition, it emerged that the "delivery issue" has not been systematically addressed in each clinical trial and for each and every cell type capable of cardiac repair. Cardiac damage occurring after an ischemic insult triggers a cascade of cellular events, eventually leading to heart failure through fibrosis and maladaptive remodelling. None of the pharmacological or medical interventions approved so far can rescue or reverse this phenomenon, and cardiovascular diseases are still the leading cause of death in the western world. Therefore, for nearly 20 years, regenerative medicine approaches have focused on cell therapy as a promising road to pursue, with numerous preclinical and clinical testing of cell-based therapies being studied and developed. Nonetheless, consistent clinical results are still missing to reach consensus on the most effective strategy for ischemic cardiomyopathy, based on patient selection, diagnosis and stage of the disease, therapeutic cell type, and delivery route.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac regenerative medicine is a field bridging together biotechnology and surgical science. In this review, we present the explored surgical roads to cell delivery and the known effects of each delivery method on cell therapy efficiency. We also list the more recent clinical trials, exploring the safety and efficacy of delivery routes used for cardiac cell therapy approaches. RECENT FINDINGS: There is no consensus in defining which way is the most suitable for the delivery of the different therapeutic cell types to the damaged heart tissue. In addition, it emerged that the "delivery issue" has not been systematically addressed in each clinical trial and for each and every cell type capable of cardiac repair. Cardiac damage occurring after an ischemic insult triggers a cascade of cellular events, eventually leading to heart failure through fibrosis and maladaptive remodelling. None of the pharmacological or medical interventions approved so far can rescue or reverse this phenomenon, and cardiovascular diseases are still the leading cause of death in the western world. Therefore, for nearly 20 years, regenerative medicine approaches have focused on cell therapy as a promising road to pursue, with numerous preclinical and clinical testing of cell-based therapies being studied and developed. Nonetheless, consistent clinical results are still missing to reach consensus on the most effective strategy for ischemic cardiomyopathy, based on patient selection, diagnosis and stage of the disease, therapeutic cell type, and delivery route.
Authors: Francesca Pagano; Francesco Angelini; Camilla Siciliano; Julia Tasciotti; Giorgio Mangino; Elena De Falco; Roberto Carnevale; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Giacomo Frati; Isotta Chimenti Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2017-01-15 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: Gen Suzuki; Brian R Weil; Rebeccah F Young; James A Fallavollita; John M Canty Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Ling Gao; Zachery R Gregorich; Wuqiang Zhu; Saidulu Mattapally; Yasin Oduk; Xi Lou; Ramaswamy Kannappan; Anton V Borovjagin; Gregory P Walcott; Andrew E Pollard; Vladimir G Fast; Xinyang Hu; Steven G Lloyd; Ying Ge; Jianyi Zhang Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexandra N Nowbar; Michael Mielewczik; Maria Karavassilis; Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Siana Jones; James P Howard; Graham D Cole; Darrel P Francis Journal: BMJ Date: 2014-04-28
Authors: Roberto Gaetani; Dries A M Feyen; Pieter A Doevendans; Hendrik Gremmels; Elvira Forte; Joost O Fledderus; Faiz Z Ramjankhan; Elisa Messina; Mark A Sussman; Alessandro Giacomello; Joost P G Sluijter Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 5.310