Literature DB >> 31672418

[Risk factors for mortality after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective observational study].

Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris1, Anastasia Zotou2, Kyriaki Koutsileou2, Diamanto Aretha2, Maria Boulovana2, Theofanis Vrettos2, Christina Sklavou2, Markos Marangos3, Fotini Fligou2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Subarachnoid haemorrhage is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to determine predictors of mortality among patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage hospitalized in an Intensive Care Unit.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of our institution during a 7 year period (2009-2015). Data were collected from the Intensive Care Unit computerized database and the patients' chart reviews.
RESULTS: We included in the study 107 patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. A ruptured aneurysm was the cause of subarachnoid haemorrhage in 76 (71%) patients. The overall mortality was 40% (43 patients), and was significantly associated with septic shock, midline shift on CT scan, inter-hospital transfer, aspiration pneumonia and hypernatraemia during the first 72 hours of Intensive Care Unit stay. Multivariate analysis of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage following an aneurysm rupture revealed that mortality was significantly associated with septic shock and hypernatremia during the first 72 hours of Intensive Care Unit stay, while early treatment of aneurysm (clipping or endovascular coiling) within the first 72 hours was identified as a predictor of a good prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Transferred patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage had lower survival rates. Septic shock and hypernatraemia were important complications among critically ill patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and were associated increased mortality.
Copyright © 2019 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bactérias produtoras de carbapenemases; Carbapenemase‐producing bacteria; Choque séptico; Hipernatremia; Hypernatraemia; Intensive Care Unit; Inter‐hospital transfer; Septic shock; Transferência inter‐hospitalar; Unidade de Tratamento Intensivo

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31672418      PMCID: PMC9391911          DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol        ISSN: 0104-0014


Introduction

SAH is a severe and complex disease which must be managed in specialized centers. Despite recent advances in treatment of SAH, either surgically or by endovascular techniques, it remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality and it usually warrants admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Based on several reports, the 30 day mortality is 18%–40%.1, 2 Previous studies have shown that prompt and timely surgical intervention was associated with better survival, even in patients with poor prognosis.3, 4 Unfortunately, an important proportion of Greek population lives in rural areas or islands and since neurosurgical departments are situated in tertiary-university hospitals, these patients are less likely to timely reach centralized services, possibly resulting in worst outcome. Our study aimed to clarify the in-hospital mortality of patients with SAH hospitalized in a tertiary Greek ICU and to assess the role of inter-hospital transfer in survival.

Material and methods

This single-center retrospective study was conducted in the general ICU (13 beds) of the University General Hospital of Patras (UGHP), Greece during a seven-year period (January 2009–December 2015). Our institution is the tertiary reference hospital for the region of Western Greece, Peloponnese and Ionian Islands, covering a population of approximately one million people. Ethical approval for this study was provided by the Research Ethics Committee of the UGHP (nº 571). All adult patients (age >18 years) with SAH who were admitted to the ICU during the study period were included in the study. Data were retrospectively collected from the ICU’s computerized database (Criticus™, University of Patras) and patients’ chart reviews. All patients were mechanically ventilated upon admission. According to severity scores, APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score), SAPS II (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II), SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scores, Glasgow Comas Scale (GCS), World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) and Hunt & Hess (H&H) grades were assessed upon ICU admission for each patient.6, 7, 8, 9 Infections were categorized as sepsis or septic shock according to definition proposed by the Third International Consensus. In case of increased intracranial pressure, an External Ventricular Drain (EVD) was placed with or without decompressive craniotomy and hematoma evacuation. In cases of aneurysmal SAH, treatment included clipping or endovascular coiling. Decision on treatment modality was based on an interdisciplinary consensus in each individual case after review of medical records, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, severity scores and CT findings. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 23.0 (IBM, SPSS, Chicago, IL) software. Categorical variables were analyzed by using the Fisher exact test and continuous variables with Mann–Whitney U-test, as appropriate. All backward stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis used all those variables from the univariate analysis with a p < 0.1. Factors contributing to multicollinearity were excluded from the multivariate analysis. Mortality rates according to distance of transfer were assessed using Spearman’s correlation analysis. The accuracy of different predicting scores upon intubation to predict mortality was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. All statistic tests were 2 tailed and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 107 SAH cases, 76 (71%) were due to aneurysm rupture. Overall mortality was 40% (43 patients). Univariate and multivariate analyses for predictors of mortality of all SAH patients are shown in Table 1. Comorbidities did not influence mortality. Mortality among all SAH patients was significantly associated with septic shock (p < 0.001; OR = 20.7; 95% CI 5.0–85.8), midline shift on CT scan (p = 0.036; OR = 3.8; 95% CI 1.1–12.9), inter-hospital transfer (p = 0.008; OR = 5.1; 95% CI 1.5–17.0), aspiration pneumonia upon admission (p = 0.031; OR = 21.2; 95% CI 1.3–340.1) and hypernatraemia during the first 72 h of ICU stay (p < 0.001; OR = 22.1; 95% CI 4.6–105.5).
Table 1

Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of morality of all patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted in ICU.

CharacteristicsUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Survivors (n = 62)Non-survivors (n = 45)ppOR (95% CI)
Demographics
 Age (years)60 ± 1158 ± 120.835
 Male gender26 (42)29 (64)0.031



Emergency department
 Syncope10 (16)10 (22)0.459
 Confusion30 (48)37 (82)0.001
 Coma9 (15)20 (44)0.001
 Epilepsy1 (2)2 (4)0.571
 Anisocoria3 (5)9 (20)0.026



CT scan findings
 Intraventricular hemorrhage12 (19)14 (31)0.178
 Intraparenchymal hemorrhage17 (27)19 (42)0.147
 Brain edema12 (19)12 (27)0.482
 Midline shift11 (18)18 (40)0.0150.0363.8 (1.1‒12.9)
 Hydrocephalus11 (18)14 (31)0.164
 Aneurysm47 (76)29 (64)0.280



ICU admission
 Transfer from other hospital29 (47)31 (69)0.0300.0085.1 (1.5‒17.0)
 Distance from UGHP (km)42 ± 5366 ± 760.047
 Aspiration pneumonia upon admission1 (2)11 (24)< 0.0010.03121.2 (1.3‒340.1)
 GCS upon presentation12 ± 39 ± 4< 0.001
 GCS upon intubation9 ± 46 ± 2< 0.001
 Hunt & Hess grade ≥ 416 (26)32 (71)< 0.001
 WFNS grade ≥ 439 (63)43 (96)< 0.001
 APACHE II Score upon admission16 ± 5719 ± 30.023
 SAPS II Score upon admission36 ± 940 ± 70.054
 SOFA Score upon admission7 ± 38 ± 20.001
 External ventricular drain39 (63)24 (53)0.329
 Decompressive craniotomy17 (27)8 (18)0.355



Hospitalization data
 ICU length of stay (days)12 ± 1018 ± 220.078
 Vasopressors25 (40)35 (78)<0.001
 Septic shock7 (11)19 (42)<0.001<0.00120.7 (5.0‒85.8)
 Carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteremia10 (16)16 (36)0.024
 Hypernatremia during the first 72 hours5 (8)21 (47)<0.001<0.00122.1 (4.6‒105.5)

Data are number (%) of patients or mean ± SD.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of morality of all patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted in ICU. Data are number (%) of patients or mean ± SD. Univariate and multivariate analyses for predictors of mortality of patients with aneurysmal SAH (n = 76) are shown in Table 2. Multivariate analysis of patients with aneurysmal SAH revealed that mortality was significantly associated with septic shock (p < 0.001; OR = 156.9; 95% CI 9.5–2586.8) and hypernatraemia during the first 72 h of ICU stay (p = 0.013; OR = 23.8; 95% CI 2.0–290.7), while treatment of aneurysm (clipping or endovascular coiling) within three days (p = 0.002; OR = 0.019; 95% CI 0.002‒0.230) was identified as a predictor of a good prognosis.
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of morality of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted in ICU.

CharacteristicsUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Survivors (n = 47)Non-survivors (n = 29)ppOR (95% CI)
Demographics
 Age (years)57 ± 1059 ± 100.535
 Male gender20 (43)16 (55)0.347



Emergency department
 Syncope9 (19)6 (21)1.000
 Confusion20 (43)23 (79)0.002
 Coma6 (13)12 (41)0.006
 Epilepsy1 (2)2 (7)0.554
 Anisocoria2 (4)6 (21)0.048



CT scan findings
 Intraventricular hemorrhage8 (17)10 (35)0.101
 Intraparenchymal hemorrhage10 (21)8 (28)0.585
 Brain edema5 (11)7 (24)0.194
 Midline shift4 (9)10 (35)0.007
 Hydrocephalus9 (19)8 (28)0.410
 Aneurysm



ICU admission
 Transfer from other hospital21 (45)20 (69)0.058
 Distance from UGHP (km)37 ± 4664 ± 920.147
 Aspiration pneumonia upon admission1 (2)5 (17)0.028
 GCS upon presentation12 ± 310 ± 40.002
 GCS upon intubation10 ± 47 ± 30.001
 Hunt & Hess grade ≥ 410 (21)20 (69)<0.001
 WFNS grade ≥ 427 (57)27 (93)0.001
 APACHE II score upon admission15 ± 619 ± 40.040
 SAPS II score upon admission35 ± 1039 ± 80.088
 SOFA score upon admission6 ± 38 ± 20.003
 External ventricular drain28 (60)18 (62)1.000
 Decompressive craniotomy10 (21)6 (21)1.000
 Aneurysm embolism22 (47)10 (35)0.344
 Aneurysm clipping18 (38)5 (17)0.072
 Timing of aneurysm treatment (days; clipping or embolism)1 ± 23 ± 30.003
 Ultra-early (<1 day) and early (1‒3 days)38 (81)7 (24)<0.0010.0020.019 (0.002‒0.230)
 Intermediate-late (>3 days) or no treatment9 (19)22 (76)



Hospitalization data
 ICU length of stay (days)12 ± 1025 ± 290.005
 Vasopressors18 (38)23 (79)0.001
 Septic shock4 (9)15 (52)<0.001<0.001156.9 (9.5‒2586.8)
 Carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteremia7 (15)12 (41)0.014
 Hypernatremia during the first 72 h4 (9)13 (45)<0.0010.01323.8 (2.0‒290.7)

Data are number (%) of patients or mean ± SD.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of morality of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage admitted in ICU. Data are number (%) of patients or mean ± SD. Since transfer of patients was associated with increased mortality, an analysis of factors that differ among transferred patients (n = 60) and those who directly admitted (n = 47) to our ICU was performed (Table 3). Among the 60 transferred patients, 27 were intubated before their transfer, whereas 23 from the 33 patients, who were intubated in the UGHP, deteriorated their GCS during transfer and although an indication for intubation was met (GCS < 9) they were intubated upon arrival. Multivariate analysis revealed that ICU mortality (p = 0.008; OR = 4.3; 95% CI 1.5–12.5), GCS ≤7 upon intubation (p = 0.010; OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.1–1.9) and WFNS grade ≥4 (p = 0.001; OR = 79.0; 95% CI 6.6–945.8) were associated with transfer of patients, while directly admitted patients had significantly higher rates of decompressive craniotomy (p = 0.007; OR = 0.156; 95% CI 0.041‒0.599). Mortality rate progressively in proportion to the distance of transfer (r = 0.586; p = 0.047), as depicted in Fig. 1. The accuracy of APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA scores, H&H and WFNS grades and GCS upon intubation in predicting mortality were 0.679, 0.617, 0.692, 0.791, 0.725 and 0.745, respectively.
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of differences among patients that were directly admitted as compared to transferred patients.

CharacteristicsUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Direct admission (n = 47)Transfer (n = 60)ppOR (95% CI)
Demographics
 Age (years)58 ± 1160 ± 110.264
 Male gender21 (45)34 (57)0.246



Emergency department
 Syncope7 (15)13 (22)0.458
 Confusion22 (47)45 (75)0.005
 Coma9 (19)20 (33)0.127
 Epilepsy0 (0)3 (5)0.254
 Anisocoria7 (15)5 (8)0.360



CT scan findings
 Intraventricular hemorrhage8 (17)18 (30)0.173
 Intraparenchymal hemorrhage14 (30)22 (37)0.538
 Brain edema9 (19)15 (25)0.495
 Midline shift10 (21)19 (32)0.277
 Hydrocephalus8 (17)17 (28)0.250
 Aneurysm36 (77)40 (67)0.290



ICU admission
 Aspiration pneumonia upon admission2 (4)10 (17)0.063
 GCS upon presentation11 ± 411 ± 40.434
 GCS upon intubation10 ± 47 ± 30.0110.0101.4 (1.1‒1.9)
 Hunt & Hess grade ≥ 414 (30)34 (57)0.006
 WFNS grade ≥ 426 (55)56 (93)<0.0010.00179.0 (6.6‒945.8)
 APACHE II score upon admission17 ± 617 ± 40.417
 SAPS II score upon admission37 ± 938 ± 90.665
 SOFA score upon admission7 ± 38 ± 20.219
 External ventricular drain31 (66)32 (53)0.236
 Decompressive craniotomy17 (36)8 (13)0.0100.0070.156 (0.041‒0.599)
 Early (<3 days) aneurysm treatment28 (60)17 (28)0.002



Hospitalization data
 Mortality14 (30)31 (52)0.0300.0084.3 (1.5‒12.5)
 ICU length of stay (days)13 ± 1319 ± 240.193
 Vasopressors22 (47)38 (63)0.117
 Septic shock13 (28)13 (22)0.503
 Carbapenemase‒producing gram-negative bacteremia9 (19)17 (28)0.364
 Hypernatremia during the first 72 h11 (23)15 (25)1.000

Data are number (%) of patients or mean ± SD.

Figure 1

Correlation between mortality rates and distance of transfer.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of differences among patients that were directly admitted as compared to transferred patients. Data are number (%) of patients or mean ± SD. Correlation between mortality rates and distance of transfer.

Discussion

In the present study, SAH accounted for 4% of all ICU admissions and the mortality of patients was 42%, higher than that reported from other studies.1, 2 It is important to acknowledge that there was a higher rate of patients with increased severity of disease as depicted by measured scores (45% of patients with H&H grade ≥4 and 77% with WFNS grade ≥4). Another important factor that adversely influenced survival was inter-hospital transfer, as shown by multivariate analysis. There are conflicting results concerning the effect of transfer to specialized centers on mortality, with most recent studies concluding that patients undergoing interhospital transfer had similar mortality rate as those that were directly admitted to a specialized center.9, 11 On the contrary, in our study, transferred patients had worse outcome (52% vs. 30%; p = 0.030). This difference was most likely due to the fact that our institution is the only tertiary university hospital in South-Western Greece receiving patients from regional hospitals within a distance up to 280 km. In a previous report, median transfer distance was 12 km (range 2–256 km), while in our cohort the median distance was 95 km (range 12–280 km). In our study, mortality rate increased proportionately to the distance of interhospital transfer (Fig. 1). This transfer of critically ill patients significantly delayed prompt surgical interventions in combination of potentially instability of vital signs for a period of time. Even though transferred and non-transferred patients had no difference of GCS upon presentation, transferred patients had a worse neurological grade upon arrival at the emergency department, as depicted by the higher rates of coma and lower GCS grade upon intubation. Failure to intubate transferred patients led to higher percentages of aspiration pneumonia (17% vs. 4%; p = 0.063), which in turn was significantly associated with reduced survival. Prompt and timely intervention (within the first three days from presentation) was independently associated with better outcome. Early intervention (clipping or endovascular coiling) was considered an option for all patients with SAH, even for those with low probability of survival. In the past, it was an option only for patients with better neurological grades. The effect of timely intervention on aneurysmal SAH outcome was shown in previous studies.3, 4 In a previous meta-analysis of poor-grade aneurysmal SAH, patients receiving ultra-early (within 48 h post ictus) treatment (surgical or endovascular) had better neurological outcome. In our study, aneurysm embolism was the preferred approach for the treatment of aneurysmal SAH, although both techniques (surgical or endovascular) showed comparable efficacy. When performance of severity scores upon admission was compared, H&H grade showed the higher accuracy in predicting ICU mortality in comparison with general severity scores (APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA) or more specific grading scales (GCS and WFNS scale). Their accuracy in the present study might be lower than previously found, most likely due to the fact that a limited number of patients with good scores were admitted to the ICU. As previously shown, since no score showed significant superiority on outcome prediction of SAH patients, all the aforementioned scores could be used to roughly predict outcome and guide clinicians. In line with previous studies, disorders of sodium concentration were frequent during the course of SAH with hypernatraemia associated with poor outcome.15, 16 In our study, hypernatraemia during the first 72 h of stay occurred in 24% of patients, comparable to previous studies (12%–22%), and was significantly associated with increased mortality in all SAH patients and in the subgroup of those with aneurysmal SAH. SAH is a common cause of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), therefore it remains a clinical challenge to distinguish between SIRS from true infection. During their stay in ICU, 49 patients (46%) developed sepsis, while septic shock affected 26 of them (24%). These rates were higher from those previously reported. Septic shock was an independent predictor of ICU mortality for all patients with SAH and for the subgroup of patients with aneurysmal SAH. In a previous study of spontaneous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, sepsis was associated with higher mortality. The main concern in Greek ICUs is that most of these infections are provoked by carbapenem-resistant gram negative bacteria (26 patients; 53%), which were associated with high mortality rates due to our limited antimicrobial options. Since carbapenemase-producing gram negative bacteria have disseminated worlwide, they pose an immediate threat to most critically ill patients globally. There were several limitations that must be taken in consideration. First, this was a single center study with a relative small number of patients. Second, even though the distance among hospitals was included, time of transferring was not measured. This could constitute a bias since the infrastructure vary among different areas of west Greece and patients arriving in hospitals on islands were transferred to UGHP by sea or air transport, which could significantly influence transfer time.

Conclusions

SAH is an important cause of ICU admission associated with increased mortality. Severity scores such as GCS, WFNS and Hunt and Hess scales remain important tools in predicting survival and guiding clinicians. Septic shock due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria constitutes an important complication among Greek critically ill patients with SAH and was found to be independently associated with reduced survival. Since transferred patients from other hospitals, as compared to patients arriving directly at our institution had lower survival rates, a reorganization of our transfer system may be warranted in order to reduce the time between first presentation and arrival to the specialized center.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  David S Rosen; R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Impact of interhospital transfer on complications and outcome after intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ashley R Catalano; H R Winn; Errol Gordon; Jennifer A Frontera
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Impact of case volume on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes.

Authors:  Tiffany R Chang; Robert G Kowalski; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Rafael J Tamargo; Neeraj S Naval
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  Does treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms within 24 hours improve clinical outcome?

Authors:  Timothy J Phillips; Richard J Dowling; Bernard Yan; John D Laidlaw; Peter J Mitchell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Timing of aneurysm surgery in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Koen de Gans; Dennis J Nieuwkamp; Gabriël J E Rinkel; Ale Algra
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  W E Hunt; R M Hess
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Impact of pattern of admission on outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Neeraj S Naval; Tiffany Chang; Filissa Caserta; Robert G Kowalski; Juan Ricardo Carhuapoma; Rafael J Tamargo
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.425

8.  Hypernatremia predicts adverse cardiovascular and neurological outcomes after SAH.

Authors:  Landis A Fisher; Nerissa Ko; Jacob Miss; Poyee P Tung; Alexander Kopelnik; Nader M Banki; David Gardner; Wade S Smith; Michael T Lawton; Jonathan G Zaroff
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  The effect of transfer and hospital volume in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.

Authors:  Miriam Nuño; Chirag G Patil; Patrick Lyden; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Nosocomial Infections and Antimicrobial Treatment in Coiled Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Peter Lackner; Christoph Mueller; Ronny Beer; Gregor Broessner; Marlene Fischer; Raimund Helbok; Alois Schiefecker; Erich Schmutzhard; Bettina Pfausler
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.465

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does establishing a neurovascular unit improve the outcome after surgical clipping for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Results from a 5-year observational study in Kuwait.

Authors:  Ahmad Kh Alhaj; Waleed Yousef; Abdulrahman Alanezi; Mariam Almutawa; Salem Zaidan; Tarik M Alsheikh; Moussa Abdulghaffar; Tariq Al-Saadi; Luigi M Cavallo; Dragan Savic
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-11-02

2.  Detecting Sepsis in Patients with Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage during Critical Care.

Authors:  Armin Niklas Flinspach; Jürgen Konczalla; Volker Seifert; Kai Zacharowski; Eva Herrmann; Ümniye Balaban; Elisabeth Hannah Adam
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.