| Literature DB >> 31671752 |
Liubov Skrypnik1, Anastasia Novikova2, Elina Tokupova3.
Abstract
The effect of selenium biofortification on phytomass yield, selenium, essential oil and phenolic compounds content as well as antioxidant properties of basil leaves was investigated. Selenium in form of sodium selenate was applied either in nutrient solution or by foliar spraying at three levels (2.0, 5.0 and 10.0 μM). Selenium treatment significantly increased Se concentration in leaves up to 20.23 μg g-1 (addition in nutrient solution) and 10.74 μg g-1 (foliar application). Neither a toxic nor a beneficial effect of Se addition on the plants was observed. Se application of 2 µM Se in nutrient solution and of 5 µM Se by foliar spraying successfully enhanced production of essential oils, hydroxycinnamic acids, total phenolics and antioxidant activity of basil leaves. The anthocyanin content was positively affected only by application of Se in nutrient solution. Considering both an increase in the Se concentration in basil leaves and an increase in the production of phytonutrients, the optimal doses of selenium can be considered to be 5 and 10 μM for Se addition in nutrient solution and by foliar treatment, respectively. The results confirm the possibility of the enrichment of basil plants with selenium and thereby improving the nutritional qualities of the human diet.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant activity; basil; biofortification; essential oil; phenolic compounds; selenium
Year: 2019 PMID: 31671752 PMCID: PMC6918393 DOI: 10.3390/plants8110458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Effect of type and concentration of Se application on selenium concentration in basil leaves and yield of whole plants and leaves.
| Se-Treatment | Se-Concentration, μM | Se Concentration in Leaves, μg g−1 | Yield, g Plant−1 | Leaves, g Plant−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 0.014 ± 0.002 aA1 | 2.71 ± 0.21 aA | 1.80 ± 0.12 aA |
| Nutrient solution | 2 | 1.06 ± 0.06 b,* | 2.70 ± 0.29 a | 1.82 ± 0.08 a |
| 5 | 8.50 ± 0.350 c,* | 3.11 ± 0.22 a | 1.99 ± 0.19 a | |
| 10 | 20.23 ± 1.24 d,* | 2.80 ± 0.39 a | 1.95 ± 0.13 a | |
| Foliar application | 2 | 0.55 ± 0.04 B,* | 2.72 ± 0.30 A | 1.82 ± 0.14 A |
| 5 | 2.72 ± 0.11 C,* | 2.85 ± 0.29 A | 1.85 ± 0.13 A | |
| 10 | 10.74 ± 0.67 D,* | 3.12 ± 0.31 A | 2.03 ± 0.18 A |
1 Data were evaluated via one-way ANOVA for each factor (Se-treatment and Se-concentration) separately. Different lower case letters indicate significant differences among plants due to selenium addition in nutrient solution; upper case letters indicate significant differences among plants due to selenium foliar application (p ≤ 0.05); asterisks * indicate significant differences among types of selenium application (p ≤ 0.05) based on post hoc Tukey’s tests.
Figure 1Effect of type and concentration of Se application on the essential oil content in basil leaves.
Figure 2Effect of type and concentration of Se application on total hydroxycinnamic acid content (THA) in basil leaves.
Figure 3Effect of type and concentration of Se application on the total anthocyanin content in basil leaves.
Figure 4Effect of type and concentration of Se application on total flavonoid content in basil leaves.
Figure 5Effect of type and concentration of Se application on the total phenolic compound content in basil leaves.
Effect of type and concentration of Se application on antioxidant activity of basil leaf extracts determined by the DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays.
| Se-Treatment | Se-Concentration, μM | Antioxidant Activity, mg TE g−1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | ABTS | FRAP | ||
|
| 0 | 8.93 ± 0.26 aA1 | 5.28 ± 0.13 aA | 15.51 ± 0.62 aA |
| Nutrient solution | 2 | 9.65 ± 0.23 b,* | 4.97 ± 0.27 a,* | 15.72 ± 0.48 a |
| 5 | 11.59 ± 0.44 c,* | 6.60 ± 0.24 b,* | 20.75 ± 0.93 b,* | |
| 10 | 14.92 ± 0.56 d,* | 8.38 ± 0.18 c,* | 22.64 ± 1.22 c,* | |
| Foliar application | 2 | 9.14 ± 0.27 A,* | 5.49 ± 0.25 A,* | 15.57 ± 0.36 A |
| 5 | 10.27 ± 0.25 B,* | 6.32 ± 0.13 B,* | 16.76 ± 0.50 A,* | |
| 10 | 13.18 ± 0.22 C,* | 7.63 ± 0.25 C,* | 19.74 ± 0.61 B,* | |
1 Data were evaluated via one-way ANOVA for each factor (Se-treatment and Se-concentration) separately. Different lower case letters indicate significant differences among plants due to selenium addition in nutrient solution; upper case letters indicate significant differences among plants due to selenium foliar application (p ≤ 0.05); asterisks * indicate significant differences among types of selenium application (p ≤ 0.05) based on post hoc Tukey’s tests.
Results of 2-factorial ANOVA for antioxidant activity.
| Main Effects | Factors | Antioxidant Activity, mg TE g−1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | ABTS | FRAP | ||
| Se-treatment | Nutrient solution | 11.27 a | 6.31 a | 18.65 a |
| Foliar application | 10.38 b | 6.18 a | 16.90 b | |
| Se-concentration | 0 | 8.93 d | 5.28 c | 15.51 c |
| (C) | 2 | 9.40 c | 5.23 c | 15.64 c |
| 5 | 10.93 b | 6.46 b | 18.76 b | |
| 10 | 14.05 a | 8.00 a | 21.19 a | |
| Significance | T | * | ns | * |
| C | * | * | * | |
| T*C | * | * | * | |
Data were evaluated via two-way ANOVA, factors: type of selenium treatment and Se concentration, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (n = 4, p ≤ 0.05). Identical letters indicate that values do not differ significantly. Asterisks indicate significantly influential factors.
Results of 2-factorial ANOVA for Se concentration in leaves and yield.
| Main Effects | Factors | Se Concentration, | Yield, g Plant−1 | Leaves, g Plant−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Se-treatment | Nutrient solution | 7.451 a | 2.829 a | 1.889 a |
| Foliar application | 3.505 b | 2.851 a | 1.874 a | |
| Se-concentration | 0 | 0.014 d | 2.706 a | 1.795 b |
| (C) | 2 | 0.805 c | 2.714 a | 1.816 ab |
| 5 | 5.61 b | 2.983 a | 1.926 ab | |
| 10 | 15.48 a | 2.958 a | 1.990 a | |
| Significance | T | * | ns | ns |
| C | * | ns | * | |
| T*C | * | ns | ns |
Data were evaluated via two-way ANOVA, factors: type of selenium treatment and Se concentration, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (n = 4, p ≤ 0.05). Identical letters indicate that values do not differ significantly. Asterisks indicate significantly influential factors.
Results of 2-factorial ANOVA for essential oils and the phenolic compound content in basil leaves under Se application.
| Main Effects | Factors | EO, | THA, | TAC, | TTC, | TPC, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Se-treatment | Nutrient solution | 0.312 a | 2.838 b | 0.398 a | 4.431 a | 20.31 a |
| Foliar application | 0.273 b | 3.117 a | 0.379 b | 4.373 a | 19.29 b | |
| Se-concentration | 0 | 0.243 b | 2.357 d | 0.370 bc | 4.428 ab | 14.89 d |
| (C) | 2 | 0.266 b | 2.836 c | 0.364 c | 4.351 ab | 18.15 c |
| 5 | 0.321 a | 3.168 b | 0.393 b | 4.294 b | 21.12 b | |
| 10 | 0.338 a | 3.550 a | 0.428 a | 4.534 a | 25.03 a | |
| Significance | T | * | * | * | ns | * |
| C | * | * | * | * | * | |
| T*C | * | * | * | ns | * |
Data were evaluated via two-way ANOVA, factors: type of selenium treatment and Se concentration, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (n = 4, p ≤ 0.05). Identical letters indicate that values do not differ significantly. Asterisks indicate significantly influential factors. EO—essential oil, THA—total hydroxycinnamic acid content, TAC—total anthocyanin content, TFC—total flavonoid content, TPC—total phenolic content