| Literature DB >> 31671743 |
María Elena Alañón1,2,3, Iván Palomo4, Lyanne Rodríguez5, Eduardo Fuentes6, David Arráez-Román7,8, Antonio Segura-Carretero9,10.
Abstract
The potential antiplatelet aggregation effects of mango pulp and its by-products (peel, husk seed, and seed) due to the presence of bioactive compounds were explored. Among them, mango seed exhibited a 72% percentage inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) agonist with a demonstrated dose-dependent effect. This biological feature could be caused by the chemical differences in phenolic composition. Mango seed was especially rich in monogalloyl compounds, tetra- and penta-galloylglucose, ellagic acid, mangiferin, and benzophenones such as maclurin derivatives and iriflophenone glucoside. Mangiferin showed an inhibitory effect of 31%, suggesting its key role as one of the main contributors to the antiplatelet activity of mango seed. Therefore, mango seed could be postulated as a natural source of bioactive compounds with antiplatelet properties to design functional foods or complementary therapeutic treatments.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC-DAD-q-TOF-MS; Mango; antiplatelet activity; bioactive compounds; by-products
Year: 2019 PMID: 31671743 PMCID: PMC6912241 DOI: 10.3390/antiox8110517
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Antiplatelet aggregation activity results of extracts from mango and its by-products (peel, seed husk and seed) at 1.0 mg/mL against adenosine 5’-diphosphate (ADP) agonist (4 μM) expressed as mean value of inhibition percentages (n = 6). Data was analyzed using ANOVA of one factor. Post hoc analyses were conducted using Tukey’s test. *** denotes significant differences compared to the negative control (absence of extract) at p = 0.001; ns denotes no statistical differences.
Figure 2Study of the dose-dependent effect of mango seed extract on antiplatelet aggregation activity against ADP agonist (4 μM) expressed as a mean value of inhibition percentages (n = 6). Data were analyzed using ANOVA of one factor. Post hoc analyses were conducted by Tukey’s test, ** and *** denotes significant differences at p = 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively; ns denotes no statistical differences.
Mean concentration of gallic acid derivative compounds from different parts of Keitt mango variety at optimum maturation stage expressed as mg/100 gdry matter.
| COMPOUNDS | PULP | PEEL | SEED HUSK | SEED | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Gallic acid | 1.55 | ± | 0.02 a | 3.57 | ± | 0.47 b | 3.93 | ± | 0.24 b | 16.67 | ± | 0.03 c |
| Galloylglucose | 42.36 | ± | 0.23 a | 112.17 | ± | 1.10 c | 43.09 | ± | 1.83 a | 53.67 | ± | 4.73 b |
| Galloyl diglucoside | 0.09 | ± | 0.00 a | 5.69 | ± | 0.07 b | 0.25 | ± | 0.01a | 6.64 | ± | 0.11 c |
| Methylgallate | 5.41 | ± | 0.48 a | 54.14 | ± | 7.77 b | 14.43 | ± | 0.89 a | 558.86 | ± | 6.74 c |
| Galloylquinic acid | 2.76 | ± | 0.12 a | 59.77 | ± | 1.79 c | 6.45 | ± | 0.50 b | 84.46 | ± | 0.34 d |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Digallic acid | ND | 2.54 | ± | 0.34 a | 1.67 | ± | 0.00 a | 3.64 | ± | 0.57 b | ||
| Digalloylglucose | 4.59 | ± | 0.03 a | 31.17 | ± | 0.57 c | 9.18 | ± | 0.59 b | 4.23 | ± | 0.09 a |
| Methyl digallate | 3.33 | ± | 0.44 a | 27.80 | ± | 4.88 c | 10.47 | ± | 0.50 b | ND | ||
| Digalloylquinic acid | 0.22 | ± | 0.00 a | 76.48 | ± | 0.55 d | 1.18 | ± | 0.10 b | 2.22 | ± | 0.02 c |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Trigalloylglucose | 0.02 | ± | 0.02 a | 9.07 | ± | 0.04 d | 0.85 | ± | 0.03 b | 3.26 | ± | 0.05 c |
| Tetragalloylglucose | 1.64 | ± | 0.02 a | 14.50 | ± | 0.89 b | 3.16 | ± | 0.13 a | 88.37 | ± | 3.22 c |
| Penta-galloylglucose | 4.13 | ± | 0.07 a | 26.61 | ± | 0.91 b | 3.93 | ± | 0.04 a | 177.31 | ± | 2.14 c |
| Hexagalloylglucose | 4.00 | ± | 0.08 a | 74.46 | ± | 0.03 b | 9.78 | ± | 0.25 a | 63.72 | ± | 7.92 b |
| Hepta-galloylglucose | 3.59 | ± | 0.00 a | 58.26 | ± | 1.75 c | 7.75 | ± | 0.15 b | ND | ||
Values with different superscripts a,b,c,d in the same row denoted significant differences according to the Student-Newman-Keulstest at p ˂ 0.05. ND: not detected.
Mean concentration of gallic acid derivative compounds from different parts of Keitt mango variety at optimum maturation stage expressed as mg/100 gdry matter.
| COMPOUNDS | PULP | PEEL | SEED HUSK | SEED | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | |||||
| Vanillic acid glucoside | 3.90 | ± | 0.19 a | 16.68 | ± | 0.42 c | 7.94 | ± | 0.36 b | 15.91 | ± | 0.77 c |
| 7.65 | ± | 0.52 c | 7.27 | ± | 0.20 c | 2.58 | ± | 0.07 a | 6.06 | ± | 0.18 b | |
| Dihydroxybenzoic acid glucoside | 0.45 | ± | 0.00 a | 0.36 | ± | 0.01 a | 0.75 | ± | 0.07 b | ND | ||
| Hydroxybenzoyl galloyl glucoside | 0.26 | ± | 0.00 b | 0.26 | ± | 0.01 b | 0.07 | ± | 0.01 a | ND | ||
| Coumaric acid glucoside | 0.07 | ± | 0.00 a | 0.52 | ± | 0.01 c | 0.29 | ± | 0.02 b | ND | ||
| Coumaroyl galloyl glucoside | 0.29 | ± | 0.02 a,b | 19.69 | ± | 0.27 c | 0.61 | ± | 0.00 b | ND | ||
| Ferulic acid hexoside | 2.50 | ± | 0.09 b | 1.81 | ± | 0.01 a | 1.91 | ± | 0.01 a | 2.91 | ± | 0.22 c |
| Sinapic acid hexoside | 0.32 | ± | 0.00 a | 0.97 | ± | 0.00 b | ND | ND | ||||
| Sinapic acid hexoside-pentoside | 7.73 | ± | 0.08 b | 14.16 | ± | 0.07 c | 6.96 | ± | 0.05 a | ND | ||
| Dihydro sinapic acid hexoside-pentoside | 3.57 | ± | 0.07 a | 4.90 | ± | 0.08 b | 3.53 | ± | 0.09 a | ND | ||
Values with different superscripts a,b,c in the same row denoted significant differences according to the Student-Newman-Keuls test at p ˂ 0.05. ND: not detected.
Mean concentration of ellagic acid, flavonols, xanthones, and benzophenones from different parts of Keitt mango variety at optimum maturation stage expressed as mg/100 gdry matter.
| COMPOUNDS | PULP | PEEL | SEED HUSK | SEED | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | |||||
| Ellagic acid | 0.02 | ± | 0.00 a | 1.35 | ± | 0.03 b | 0.56 | ± | 0.04 a | 7.46 | ± | 0.54 c |
| Catechin | 0.49 | ± | 0.01 a | 12.18 | ± | 0.78 c | 1.17 | ± | 0.26 a | 9.97 | ± | 0.71 b |
| Quercetin glucoside | ND | 21.28 | ± | 0.63 c | 0.21 | ± | 0.05 a | 1.39 | ± | 0.14 b | ||
| Quercetin galactoside | ND | 10.91 | ± | 0.45 b | 0.02 | ± | 0.00 a | ND | ||||
| Quercetin xyloside | ND | 2.83 | ± | 0.25 a | ND | ND | ||||||
| Quercetin arabinopyranoside | ND | 2.94 | ± | 0.20 a | ND | ND | ||||||
| Rhamnetin hexoside | ND | 2.37 | ± | 0.05 a | ND | ND | ||||||
| 7- | ND | 2.91 | ± | 0.11 a | ND | 13.99 | ± | 0.29 b | ||||
| Mangiferin | ND | ND | 3.75 | ± | 0.29 a | 148.12 | ± | 0.74 b | ||||
| Maclurin C-glucoside | ND | ND | 0.01 | ± | 0.01 a | 11.40 | ± | 0.48 b | ||||
| Maclurin galloyl glucoside | ND | 4.60 | ± | 0.04 b | 0.84 | ± | 0.12 a | 9.63 | ± | 0.04 c | ||
| Maclurin digalloyl glucoside | ND | 1.63 | ± | 0.04 a | ND | 6.21 | ± | 0.28 b | ||||
| Iriflophenone glucoside | ND | ND | ND | 10.89 | ± | 0.28 a | ||||||
Values with different superscripts a,b,c in the same row denoted significant differences according to the Studente-Newman-Keuls test at p ˂ 0.05. ND: not detected.
Figure 3Antiplatelet aggregation activity results of mango seed extract and mangiferin at 1.0 mg/mL against ADP agonist (4 μM) expressed as mean value of inhibition percentages (n = 6). Data was analyzed using ANOVA of one factor. Post hoc analyses were conducted by Tukey’s test. *** denotes significant differences compared to the negative control (absence of extract) at p = 0.001; ns denotes no statistical differences.