| Literature DB >> 31671616 |
Anne Birkeholm Jensen1,2, Marianne Lund3, Niels Nørskov-Lauritsen4, Anders Johansson5, Rolf Claesson6, Jesper Reinholdt7, Dorte Haubek8.
Abstract
Leukotoxic potential of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains has been studied by the use of several methods, and results differ depending on the methods used. The aim of the present study was to perform a comprehensive examination of the leukotoxic potential of a collection of A. actinomycetemcomitans strains by use of three quantitative methods, Western blotting, ELISA, and mRNA expression assay and compare these results with previous data obtained by a cell lysis assay. A higher leukotoxic potential among JP2 genotype strains compared to non-JP2 genotype strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans was found by Western blotting, ELISA and mRNA expression assay. Leukotoxicity as determined by cell lysis assay showed a variation among strains examined, not only depending on being part of JP2 genotype vs. non-JP2 genotype group of A. actinomycetemcomitans. The leukotoxicity of A. actinomycetemcomitans strains as determined by cell lysis assay did not correspond to the leukotoxic potential of A. actinomycetemcomitans strains as determined by three quantitative methods. A comparison of the results obtained by ELISA and mRNA expression assay showed a reasonable correlation between these two methods. It seems important to use more than one method to assess the LtxA-related virulence capacity of A. actinomycetemcomitans in order to obtain comprehensive understanding of the leukotoxic potential of A. actinomycetemcomitans strains.Entities:
Keywords: JP2 genotype; cell lysis assay; leukotoxin; mRNA assay; quantitative ELISA
Year: 2019 PMID: 31671616 PMCID: PMC6963569 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens8040211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Characterization of the collection of A. actinomycetemcomitans strains, serotype b.
| Bacterial Strains | Genotype | Origin | Leukotoxicity * |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Average |
| 153 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Average |
| 212 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Average |
| 217 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Average |
| 640 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Average |
| 443 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | High |
| 486 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | High |
| 575 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | High |
| 605 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | High |
| 638 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | High |
| 369 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Low |
| 467 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Low |
| 493 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Low |
| 708 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Low |
| 744 G | non-JP2 | Ghana | Low |
| 331 M | non-JP2 | Morocco | |
| 394 M | non-JP2 | Morocco | |
| 416 M | non-JP2 | Morocco | |
| HK1605 | non-JP2 | USA | |
| HK908 | non-JP2 | Porto-Brazil 1 | |
| HK911 | non-JP2 | Holland | |
| HK912 | non-JP2 | Holland | |
| HK975 (Y4) | non-JP2 | USA | |
| 437 G | JP2 | Ghana | High |
| 488 G | JP2 | Ghana | High |
| 524 G | JP2 | Ghana | High |
| 654 G | JP2 | Ghana | High |
| 666 G | JP2 | Ghana | High |
| HK1199 | JP2 | USA | |
| HK1507 | JP2 | Cape Verde Isands-Sweden 2 | |
| HK1519 | JP2 | Cape Verde Islands-Sweden 2 | |
| HK1547 | JP2 | USA | |
| HK1609 | JP2 | USA | |
| HK1615 | JP2 | USA | |
| HK1626 | JP2 | Tel Aviv-Switzerland 3 | |
| HK1630 | JP2 | Algeria-Denmark 4 | |
| HK1631 | JP2 | Morocco-Denmark 5 | |
| HK1651 | JP2 | Ghana-Denmark 6 | |
| HK1659 | JP2 | Morocco-Denmark 5 | |
| HK1702 | JP2 | Brazil | |
| HK1707 | JP2 | Brazil | |
| HK1990 | JP2 | Portugal-Holland | |
| HK2000 | JP2 | Morocco | |
| HK2017 | JP2 | Tel Aviv | |
| HK921 (JP2) | JP2 | USA |
* As defined by Höglund Åberg and coworkers (2014): 0–30% LDH release = low leukotoxicity, 31–60% = average leukotoxicity and 60% ≤ = high leukotoxicity. 1 Originating from Portugal, 2 Originating from Cape Verde Islands, 3 Originating from Tel Aviv, 4 Originating from Algeria, 5 Originating from Morocco, 6 Originating from Ghana.
Figure 1Leukotoxicity, leukotoxin production and leukotoxin expression of 20 Ghanaian A. actinomycetemcomitans, serotype b, JP2 and non-JP2 genotype strains determined by a cell lysis assay (LDH), an ELISA, and a mRNA expression assay.
Figure 2Box plot of the distribution of the 20 Ghanaian A. actinomycetemcomitans strains according to JP2 genotype and non-JP2 genotype strains.
Figure 3The distribution of the expanded bacterial collection of 45 A. actinomycetemcomitans strains for comparison of the results obtained by ELISA and in mRNA expression assay.
Figure 4A comparison of the group of JP2 genotype strains and the group of non-JP2 genotype strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans based on the expanded bacterial collection of 45 strains for comparison of results obtained by ELISA and in mRNA expression assays by use of log-transformed data.
Figure 5A comparison of ELISA and mRNA expression assay by an ordinary least square regression model based on the expanded bacterial collection consisting of 23 non-JP2 genotype strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans (black dots) and 22 JP2 genotype strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans (white dots) by use of log-transformed data.
Primers and probes used in the mRNA expression analysis of A. actinomycetemcomitans.
| Gene | Primer F (5’ → 3’) | Primer R (3’ → 5’) | Probe (5’ → 3’) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| TAACCATGCACTTCGTGTCTAAC | CACAAGGGTGGTTTCCGGATT | TGGACGGCACGCACATTGCGGAAAC |
|
| GATATGTTACGTTCCGCGATCA | GCACTAATTGACCGGCATCCA | AGCTGGCACCGAGTTAGGCAAACAAGC |
|
| CTGTCGCAGGGTTAATTGCCT | GATCAAATTGTTTCGCAATACCTAG | TGTGGTCAGCTTGGCAATCAGCCCTTTG |