Literature DB >> 31671174

Factors associated with long-term wearable physical activity monitor user engagement.

Ciarán P Friel1,2, Talea Cornelius2, Keith M Diaz2.   

Abstract

Wearable physical activity monitors (PAMs) have potential to positively influence physical activity. However, high rates of disengagement have been reported, which dampens enthusiasm, as these devices are unlikely to impact habitual physical activity if they are not worn for a sustained period of time. The purpose of this study was to identify demographic and device-use characteristics (e.g., data sharing) associated with sustained device engagement. Current PAM users (n = 418; mean age: 35.0 ± 12.5; 78% female) from across the USA were recruited online and completed a baseline web-based survey in 2015-2016 comprising questions about demographics and device use. Participants were followed-up again in 2017, at which time they reported whether or not they still used a PAM. Sustained PAM engagement was defined as those who continued use at follow-up. The median follow-up time was 15.5 (±3.7) months. In fully adjusted models, the following were significantly associated with long-term engagement: age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.05, p = .014), Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 3.67; 95% CI: 1.20-11.26, p = .023), running as a preferred exercise (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.02-3.24, p = .043), wanting to monitor health variables as a reason for choosing to use a PAM (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.02-2.92, p = .042), and sharing data from the PAM publicly on social media (e.g., Facebook and Twitter; OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 1.64-15.93, p = .005). A number of sociodemographic and use characteristics were associated with sustained device use over a median follow-up of 1.3 years. One modifiable factor that may lead to longer device engagement is encouraging users to share data publicly. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity monitors; Physical activity; Social media; Social networks; Wearables

Year:  2021        PMID: 31671174      PMCID: PMC7982124          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  12 in total

1.  Automated hovering in health care--watching over the 5000 hours.

Authors:  David A Asch; Ralph W Muller; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Stefanie Ashford; Falko F Sniehotta; Stephan U Dombrowski; Alex Bishop; David P French
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-06-28

3.  Personal Health Records: More Promising in the Smartphone Era?

Authors:  Christian Dameff; Brian Clay; Christopher A Longhurst
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Device-based monitoring in physical activity and public health research.

Authors:  David R Bassett
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community.

Authors:  G Godin; R J Shephard
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1985-09

6.  Tweeting it off: characteristics of adults who tweet about a weight loss attempt.

Authors:  Sherry Pagoto; Kristin L Schneider; Martinus Evans; Molly E Waring; Brad Appelhans; Andrew M Busch; Matthew C Whited; Herpreet Thind; Michelle Ziedonis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Utility of Consumer Physical Activity Trackers as an Intervention Tool in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Amanda M Hickey; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 8.  The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liliana Laranjo; Amaël Arguel; Ana L Neves; Aideen M Gallagher; Ruth Kaplan; Nathan Mortimer; Guilherme A Mendes; Annie Y S Lau
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Behavior change techniques implemented in electronic lifestyle activity monitors: a systematic content analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Lyons; Zakkoyya H Lewis; Brian G Mayrsohn; Jennifer L Rowland
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Adherent Use of Digital Health Trackers Is Associated with Weight Loss.

Authors:  Arya Pourzanjani; Tom Quisel; Luca Foschini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Experiences of activity monitoring and perceptions of digital support among working individuals with hip and knee osteoarthritis - a focus group study.

Authors:  Elin Östlind; Eva Ekvall Hansson; Frida Eek; Kjerstin Stigmar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.135

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.