Leonore F Albers1,2, Soemeya F Haj Mohammad1,2, Olga Husson3,4,5, Hein Putter6, Rob C M Pelger1,2, Henk W Elzevier1,2, Eveliene Manten-Horst3. 1. Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Dutch AYA "Young and Cancer" Platform, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands. 5. Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. 6. Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Purpose: Negative impact of cancer on sexuality is widely known. In adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYA; 15-39 years), treatment can even have a bigger impact as it may interfere with sexual development. AYAs report unmet psychosexual needs, like inadequate support from health care professionals (HCPs). The aim of this study was to determine preferences of AYAs regarding communication about intimacy and sexuality and examine discrepancies between AYA and HCP. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among AYAs and HCPs in the Netherlands. Results: Communication about sexuality was considered important by >90% of AYAs and HCPs. Of the AYAs, 41% did receive information from a HCP, 21% of them was satisfied with it. HCPs held physicians and nurse practitioners responsible to discuss sexuality; AYAs preferred nurse practitioners and sexologists. Main barriers to initiate a discussion on sexuality are "feeling of shame" for AYAs and "presence of a third party" for HCPs. Most AYAs would like to receive information about sexuality through a website (66%) or conversation with a HCP (64%) before start of treatment (64%). HCPs would be helped by written material (75%) and additional training (71%) to give to AYAs. Conclusion: AYAs do report unmet needs regarding adequate communication about sexuality-related issues. Discrepancy between patients and HCPs illustrates the importance of patient participation. Future research needs to focus on interventions to improve sexuality-related information provision and implementation of these interventions.
Purpose: Negative impact of cancer on sexuality is widely known. In adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYA; 15-39 years), treatment can even have a bigger impact as it may interfere with sexual development. AYAs report unmet psychosexual needs, like inadequate support from health care professionals (HCPs). The aim of this study was to determine preferences of AYAs regarding communication about intimacy and sexuality and examine discrepancies between AYA and HCP. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among AYAs and HCPs in the Netherlands. Results: Communication about sexuality was considered important by >90% of AYAs and HCPs. Of the AYAs, 41% did receive information from a HCP, 21% of them was satisfied with it. HCPs held physicians and nurse practitioners responsible to discuss sexuality; AYAs preferred nurse practitioners and sexologists. Main barriers to initiate a discussion on sexuality are "feeling of shame" for AYAs and "presence of a third party" for HCPs. Most AYAs would like to receive information about sexuality through a website (66%) or conversation with a HCP (64%) before start of treatment (64%). HCPs would be helped by written material (75%) and additional training (71%) to give to AYAs. Conclusion: AYAs do report unmet needs regarding adequate communication about sexuality-related issues. Discrepancy between patients and HCPs illustrates the importance of patient participation. Future research needs to focus on interventions to improve sexuality-related information provision and implementation of these interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
information; intimacy; quality of life; sexuality
Authors: Bryan A Sisk; Kieandra Harvey; Annie B Friedrich; Alison L Antes; Lauren H Yaeger; Jennifer W Mack; James M DuBois Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Kari L Bjornard; Carrie R Howell; James L Klosky; Wassim Chemaitilly; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Tara M Brinkman; Daniel M Green; Victoria W Willard; Lisa M Jacola; Matthew J Krasin; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Kirsten K Ness Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Leonore F Albers; Folkertje B Bergsma; Hilda Mekelenkamp; Rob C M Pelger; Eveliene Manten-Horst; Henk W Elzevier Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 2.037