Literature DB >> 31670444

Limitations of cross- and multigenerational plasticity for marine invertebrates faced with global climate change.

Maria Byrne1,2, Shawna A Foo3, Pauline M Ross2, Hollie M Putnam4.   

Abstract

Although cross generation (CGP) and multigenerational (MGP) plasticity have been identified as mechanisms of acclimation to global change, the weight of evidence indicates that parental conditioning over generations is not a panacea to rescue stress sensitivity in offspring. For many species, there were no benefits of parental conditioning. Even when improved performance was observed, this waned over time within a generation or across generations and fitness declined. CGP and MGP studies identified resilient species with stress tolerant genotypes in wild populations and selected family lines. Several bivalves possess favourable stress tolerance and phenotypically plastic traits potentially associated with genetic adaptation to life in habitats where they routinely experience temperature and/or acidification stress. These traits will be important to help 'climate proof' shellfish ventures. Species that are naturally stress tolerant and those that naturally experience a broad range of environmental conditions are good candidates to provide insights into the physiological and molecular mechanisms involved in CGP and MGP. It is challenging to conduct ecologically relevant global change experiments over the long times commensurate with the pace of changing climate. As a result, many studies present stressors in a shock-type exposure at rates much faster than projected scenarios. With more gradual stressor introduction over longer experimental durations and in context with conditions species are currently acclimatized and/or adapted to, the outcomes for sensitive species might differ. We highlight the importance to understand primordial germ cell development and the timing of gametogenesis with respect to stressor exposure. Although multigenerational exposure to global change stressors currently appears limited as a universal tool to rescue species in the face of changing climate, natural proxies of future conditions (upwelling zones, CO2 vents, naturally warm habitats) show that phenotypic adjustment and/or beneficial genetic selection is possible for some species, indicating complex plasticity-adaptation interactions.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; habitat warming; ocean acidification; phenotypic plasticity; stress resilience

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31670444     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  11 in total

1.  Evolutionarily conserved peptides coordinate lunar phase and metabolism.

Authors:  Kathleen Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Transgenerational plasticity and the capacity to adapt to low salinity in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica.

Authors:  Joanna S Griffiths; Kevin M Johnson; Kyle A Sirovy; Mark S Yeats; Francis T C Pan; Jerome F La Peyre; Morgan W Kelly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Crown of thorns starfish life-history traits contribute to outbreaks, a continuing concern for coral reefs.

Authors:  Dione J Deaker; Maria Byrne
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2022-03-14

4.  Can prior exposure to stress enhance resilience to ocean warming in two oyster species?

Authors:  Roberta R C Pereira; Elliot Scanes; Mitchell Gibbs; Maria Byrne; Pauline M Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Systematical Survey on the TRP Channels Provides New Insight into Its Functional Diversity in Zhikong Scallop (Chlamys farreri).

Authors:  Cheng Peng; Zujing Yang; Zhi Liu; Shenhai Wang; Haitao Yu; Chang Cui; Yuqing Hu; Qiang Xing; Jingjie Hu; Xiaoting Huang; Zhenmin Bao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Plasticity to ocean warming is influenced by transgenerational, reproductive, and developmental exposure in a coral reef fish.

Authors:  Moisés A Bernal; Timothy Ravasi; Giverny G Rodgers; Philip L Munday; Jennifer M Donelson
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Heat tolerance and thermal preference of the copepod Tigriopus californicus are insensitive to ecologically relevant dissolved oxygen levels.

Authors:  Khuong V Dinh; Arani Y Cuevas-Sanchez; Katherine S Buhl; Elizabeth A Moeser; W Wesley Dowd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Environmentally-induced parental or developmental conditioning influences coral offspring ecological performance.

Authors:  Hollie M Putnam; Raphael Ritson-Williams; Jolly Ann Cruz; Jennifer M Davidson; Ruth D Gates
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reproductive traits and population dynamics of benthic invertebrates indicate episodic recruitment patterns across an Arctic polar front.

Authors:  Adam J Reed; Jasmin A Godbold; Martin Solan; Laura J Grange
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Effects of thermal conditioning on the performance of Pocillopora acuta adult coral colonies and their offspring.

Authors:  Crystal J McRae; Wen-Bin Huang; Tung-Yung Fan; Isabelle M Côté
Journal:  Coral Reefs       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.902

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.