Literature DB >> 31670435

Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives.

Shilong Piao1,2,3, Xuhui Wang1, Kai Wang1, Xiangyi Li1, Ana Bastos4, Josep G Canadell5, Philippe Ciais1,6, Pierre Friedlingstein7, Stephen Sitch8.   

Abstract

With accumulation of carbon cycle observations and model developments over the past decades, exploring interannual variation (IAV) of terrestrial carbon cycle offers the opportunity to better understand climate-carbon cycle relationships. However, despite growing research interest, uncertainties remain on some fundamental issues, such as the contributions of different regions, constituent fluxes and climatic factors to carbon cycle IAV. Here we overviewed the literature on carbon cycle IAV about current understanding of these issues. Observations and models of the carbon cycle unanimously show the dominance of tropical land ecosystems to the signal of global carbon cycle IAV, where tropical semiarid ecosystems contribute as much as the combination of all other tropical ecosystems. Vegetation photosynthesis contributes more than ecosystem respiration to IAV of the global net land carbon flux, but large uncertainties remain on the contribution of fires and other disturbance fluxes. Climatic variations are the major drivers to the IAV of net land carbon flux. Although debate remains on whether the dominant driver is temperature or moisture variability, their interaction,that is, the dependence of carbon cycle sensitivity to temperature on moisture conditions, is emerging as key regulators of the carbon cycle IAV. On timescales from the interannual to the centennial, global carbon cycle variability will be increasingly contributed by northern land ecosystems and oceans. Therefore, both improving Earth system models (ESMs) with the progressive understanding on the fast processes manifested at interannual timescale and expanding carbon cycle observations at broader spatial and longer temporal scales are critical to better prediction on evolution of the carbon-climate system.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon cycle; carbon-climate system; interaction of climatic factors; interannual variability; moisture; semiarid; temperature; terrestrial ecosystems

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31670435     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  8 in total

1.  Worldwide impacts of atmospheric vapor pressure deficit on the interannual variability of terrestrial carbon sinks.

Authors:  Bin He; Chen Chen; Shangrong Lin; Wenping Yuan; Hans W Chen; Deliang Chen; Yafeng Zhang; Lanlan Guo; Xiang Zhao; Xuebang Liu; Shilong Piao; Ziqian Zhong; Rui Wang; Rui Tang
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 17.275

2.  Regional and seasonal partitioning of water and temperature controls on global land carbon uptake variability.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Ana Bastos; Philippe Ciais; Xuhui Wang; Christian Rödenbeck; Pierre Gentine; Frédéric Chevallier; Vincent W Humphrey; Chris Huntingford; Michael O'Sullivan; Sonia I Seneviratne; Stephen Sitch; Shilong Piao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2).

Authors:  William R Wieder; Zachary Butterfield; Keith Lindsay; Danica L Lombardozzi; Gretchen Keppel-Aleks
Journal:  Global Biogeochem Cycles       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.500

4.  Seasonal biological carryover dominates northern vegetation growth.

Authors:  Xu Lian; Shilong Piao; Anping Chen; Kai Wang; Xiangyi Li; Wolfgang Buermann; Chris Huntingford; Josep Peñuelas; Hao Xu; Ranga B Myneni
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Productive wetlands restored for carbon sequestration quickly become net CO2 sinks with site-level factors driving uptake variability.

Authors:  Alex C Valach; Kuno Kasak; Kyle S Hemes; Tyler L Anthony; Iryna Dronova; Sophie Taddeo; Whendee L Silver; Daphne Szutu; Joseph Verfaillie; Dennis D Baldocchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Tropical extreme droughts drive long-term increase in atmospheric CO2 growth rate variability.

Authors:  Xiangzhong Luo; Trevor F Keenan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 7.  Bridge to the future: Important lessons from 20 years of ecosystem observations made by the OzFlux network.

Authors:  Jason Beringer; Caitlin E Moore; Jamie Cleverly; David I Campbell; Helen Cleugh; Martin G De Kauwe; Miko U F Kirschbaum; Anne Griebel; Sam Grover; Alfredo Huete; Lindsay B Hutley; Johannes Laubach; Tom Van Niel; Stefan K Arndt; Alison C Bennett; Lucas A Cernusak; Derek Eamus; Cacilia M Ewenz; Jordan P Goodrich; Mingkai Jiang; Nina Hinko-Najera; Peter Isaac; Sanaa Hobeichi; Jürgen Knauer; Georgia R Koerber; Michael Liddell; Xuanlong Ma; Craig Macfarlane; Ian D McHugh; Belinda E Medlyn; Wayne S Meyer; Alexander J Norton; Jyoteshna Owens; Andy Pitman; Elise Pendall; Suzanne M Prober; Ram L Ray; Natalia Restrepo-Coupe; Sami W Rifai; David Rowlings; Louis Schipper; Richard P Silberstein; Lina Teckentrup; Sally E Thompson; Anna M Ukkola; Aaron Wall; Ying-Ping Wang; Tim J Wardlaw; William Woodgate
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 13.211

8.  Escherichia coli γ-carbonic anhydrase: characterisation and effects of simple aromatic/heterocyclic sulphonamide inhibitors.

Authors:  Sonia Del Prete; Silvia Bua; Claudiu T Supuran; Clemente Capasso
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.051

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.