Literature DB >> 31669697

Towards multi-dynamic mechano-biological optimization of 3D-printed scaffolds to foster bone regeneration.

Camille Metz1, Georg N Duda2, Sara Checa3.   

Abstract

Substantial tissue loss, such as in large bone defects, represents a clinical challenge for which regenerative therapies and tissue engineering strategies aim at offering treatment alternatives to conventional replacement approaches by metallic implants. 3D printing technologies provide endless opportunities to shape scaffold structures that could support endogenous regeneration. However, it remains unclear which of the numerous parameters at hand eventually enhance tissue regeneration. In the last decades, a significant effort has been made in the development of computer tools to optimize scaffold designs. Here, we aim at giving a more comprehensive overview summarizing current computer optimization framework technologies. We confront these with the most recent advances in scaffold mechano-biological optimization, discuss their limitations and provide suggestions for future development. We conclude that the field needs to move forward to not only optimize scaffolds to avoid implant failures but to improve their mechano-biological behaviour: providing an initial stimulus for fast tissue organisation and healing and accounting for remodelling, scaffold degradation and consecutive filling with host tissue. So far, modelling approaches fall short in including the various scales of tissue dynamics. With this review, we wish to stimulate a move towards multi-dynamic mechano-biological optimization of 3D-printed scaffolds. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Large bone defects represent a clinical challenge for which tissue engineering strategies aim at offering alternatives to conventional treatment strategies. 3D printing technologies provide endless opportunities to shape scaffold structures that could support endogenous regeneration. However, it remains unclear which of the numerous parameters at hand eventually enhance tissue regeneration. In the last decades, a significant effort has been made in the development of computer tools to optimize scaffold designs. This review summarizes current computer optimization frameworks and most recent advances in mechano-biological optimization of bone scaffolds to better stimulate bone regeneration. We wish to stimulate a move towards multi-dynamic mechano-biological optimization of 3D-printed scaffolds.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D scaffold design; Bone tissue engineering; Mechano-biology; Structural optimization; Tissue regeneration

Year:  2019        PMID: 31669697     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  9 in total

1.  Biomaterial-directed cell behavior for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Hyun Kim; Sangamesh G Kumbar; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-12-25

2.  Mechanobiological Approach to Design and Optimize Bone Tissue Scaffolds 3D Printed with Fused Deposition Modeling: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Gianluca Percoco; Antonio Emmanuele Uva; Michele Fiorentino; Michele Gattullo; Vito Modesto Manghisi; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Mechano-Biological Computer Model of Scaffold-Supported Bone Regeneration: Effect of Bone Graft and Scaffold Structure on Large Bone Defect Tissue Patterning.

Authors:  Camille Perier-Metz; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-11

4.  Electroless Palladium-Coated Polymer Scaffolds for Electrical Stimulation of Osteoblast-Like Saos-2 Cells.

Authors:  Oriol Careta; Asier Salicio-Paz; Eva Pellicer; Elena Ibáñez; Jordina Fornell; Eva García-Lecina; Jordi Sort; Carme Nogués
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Comparison of Vestibular Depth Relapse and Wound Healing After Reconstructive Preprosthetic Surgery Using Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane and Acellular Dermal Matrix - A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Danial Babaki; Masoumeh Khoshsimaybargard; Sanam Yaghoubi; Mahdi Gholami
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-24

Review 6.  Challenges in computational fluid dynamics applications for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Tiago Pires; John W C Dunlop; Paulo Rui Fernandes; André P G Castro
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  A mechanobiological computer optimization framework to design scaffolds to enhance bone regeneration.

Authors:  Camille Perier-Metz; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-07

Review 8.  Main 3D Manufacturing Techniques for Customized Bone Substitutes. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Javier Montero; Alicia Becerro; Beatriz Pardal-Peláez; Norberto Quispe-López; Juan-Francisco Blanco; Cristina Gómez-Polo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Initial mechanical conditions within an optimized bone scaffold do not ensure bone regeneration - an in silico analysis.

Authors:  Camille Perier-Metz; Georg N Duda; Sara Checa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-06-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.