Literature DB >> 31669564

Toxicity and Biochemical Outcomes of Dose-Intensified Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial.

Xin Qi1, Hong-Zhen Li1, Xian-Shu Gao2, Shang-Bin Qin1, Min Zhang1, Xiao-Mei Li1, Xiao-Ying Li1, Ming-Wei Ma1, Yun Bai1, Xue-Ying Li3, Dian Wang4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to compare toxicity and biochemical control in postprostatectomy patients treated with conventional (66 Gy) or dose-intensified (72 Gy) radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients who had stage pT3-4, positive surgical margins, or rising prostate-specific antigen ≥ 0.2 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy were randomly assigned to receive either 66 Gy in 33 fractions or 72 Gy in 36 fractions. A primary endpoint was to assess the difference in biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) between these 2 cohorts, and secondary endpoints were to assess differences in genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and hematologic toxicities between these 2 cohorts. bPFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and toxicities were compared using the χ2 test.
RESULTS: Between September 2011 and November 2016, 144 patients were enrolled: 71 patients to the 66 Gy cohort and 73 patients to the 72 Gy cohort. The median follow-up time was 48.5 months (range, 14-79 months). There was no difference in 4-year bPFS between the 66 Gy and 72 Gy cohorts (75.9% vs 82.6%; P = .299). However, in patients with a higher Gleason score (8-10), the 72 Gy cohort had statistically significant improvement in bPFS compared with the 66 Gy cohort (79.7% vs 55.7%; P = .049). Toxicity analysis showed no difference in ≥2 acute or late GI or GU toxicities between these 2 cohorts. A total of 48 patients were scored as urinary incontinence before radiation therapy, of which 39 (81.3%) reported incontinence recovery or stable at 1-year follow-up, and only 9 (18.8%) patients reported worsening. There was no difference between the 2 cohorts in urinary incontinence either at baseline or at 1-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation (72 Gy) demonstrated no improvement in 4-year bPFS compared with the 66 Gy regimen. However, the dose escalation was not associated with greater acute or late GU or GI toxicities and did not increase urinary incontinence.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31669564     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  [Salvage prostate bed radiotherapy: co-irradiation of regional LNs and significance of ADT].

Authors:  Felix Grabenbauer; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Comparison Between Dose-Escalated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy for Salvage Radiation Therapy After Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nana Shimoyachi; Yasuo Yoshioka; Kazuma Sasamura; Junji Yonese; Shinya Yamamoto; Takeshi Yuasa; Takashi Soyano; Takuyo Kozuka; Masahiko Oguchi
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-13

3.  Impact of Dose Escalation on the Efficacy of Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer-A Risk-Adjusted, Matched-Pair Analysis.

Authors:  Dirk Böhmer; Alessandra Siegmann; Sophia Scharl; Christian Ruf; Thomas Wiegel; Manuel Krafcsik; Reinhard Thamm
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Postoperative Effect Observation and Clinical Study of Dahuang Zhechong Pills from Jingui Yaolue in Treating Patients with Early-to-Mid Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Resection.

Authors:  Shizhao Hou; Chengguo Bin
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-27

5.  Assessing radiation dose for postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer: Real world data.

Authors:  Asunción Hervás-Morón; Jose Domínguez-Rullán; Victor Duque Santana; Mireia Valero; Carmen Vallejo; Sonsoles Sancho; Juan David García Fuentes; Fernando López-Campos; Miguel Cámara Gallego
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-24

Review 6.  Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Derya Tilki; Tanya Dorff; Daniel E Spratt; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.