Literature DB >> 31669246

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Basilar Artery Occlusion Compared with Anterior Circulation Stroke.

Junji Uno1, Katsuharu Kameda2, Ryosuke Otsuji2, Nice Ren2, Shintaro Nagaoka2, Kazushi Maeda2, Yoshiaki Ikai2, Hidefuku Gi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) and to ascertain whether outcomes for patients with BAO were comparable to those with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACS).
METHODS: A total of 345 patients who underwent MT between 2011 and 2018 were grouped by occlusion site (295 patients with ACS and 50 patients with BAO). Patients' baseline characteristics, procedural times, complications, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, modified Rankin Scale score, and mortality at 90 days were analyzed.
RESULTS: Male preponderance (66.0% vs. 48.8%; P = 0.0316), younger age (72.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 64.75-78.5 years] vs. 77 years [IQR 69-84 years]; P = 0.0297), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (24.5 [IQR, 13-32] vs. 18 [IQR 13-22]; P = 0.0015) and higher reperfusion rate (100% vs. 84.7%; P = 0.0010) were observed in patients with BAO. We found no significant difference in favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) between patients with BAO and patients with ACS (64.3% vs. 49.3%; P = 0.0914). In multivariate analysis, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (odds ratio [OR], 1.282; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.090-1.524; P = 0.0024), time from onset to reperfusion (OTR) (OR, 0.9950; 95% CI, 0.992-0.998; P = 0.0008), successful reperfusion (OR, 6.953; 95% CI, 1.576-48.729; P = 0.0092), and hemorrhagic complication (OR, 0.352; 95% CI, 0.151-0.797; P = 0.0122) were associated with a favorable outcome at 90 days in patients with ACS. In patients with BAO, only OTR (OR, 0.9879; 95% CI, 0.974-0.999; P = 0.0314) was associated with a favorable outcome at 90 days.
CONCLUSIONS: MT may be considered the standard care for patients with BAO. OTR was the only common significant predictor for favorable outcomes in both patient cohorts.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basilar artery occlusion; Cerebrovascular disease/stroke; Mechanical thrombectomy; Posterior circulation; Revascularization; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31669246     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

1.  Endovascular Treatment Combined With Standard Medical Treatment Improves Outcomes of Posterior Circulation Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shuju Dong; Yanbo Li; Jian Guo; Yaxi Luo; Jinghuan Fang; Li Tang; Li He
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 2.  Endovascular Treatment for Posterior Circulation Stroke: Ways to Maximize Therapeutic Efficacy.

Authors:  Seong-Joon Lee; Ji Man Hong; Jong S Kim; Jin Soo Lee
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 8.632

3.  Age and discharge modified Rankin score are associated with 90-Day functional outcome after basilar artery occlusion treated with endovascular therapy.

Authors:  Rahul R Karamchandani; Dale Strong; Jeremy B Rhoten; Tanushree Prasad; Jacob Selig; Gary Defilipp; Andrew W Asimos
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 1.764

4.  Posterior circulation acute stroke prognosis early CT scores in predicting functional outcomes: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Zhen Lu; Hui-An Lin; Chyi-Huey Bai; Sheng-Feng Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion in posterior and anterior circulation: a single institutional retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Tomoyoshi Kuribara; Satoshi Iihoshi; Eisuke Tsukagoshi; Akio Teranishi; Yu Kinoshita; Shin Sugasawa; Shinya Kohyama; Shinichi Takahashi; Hiroki Kurita
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.804

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.