Literature DB >> 31669245

Correlation Between Different Interbody Grafts and Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Compared with Control Group: Systematic Review.

Eduardo Augusto Iunes1, Enrico Affonso Barletta2, Telmo Augusto Barba Belsuzarri3, Franz Jooji Onishi4, Sergio Cavalheiro4, Andrei Fernandes Joaquim5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine degenerative disease is one of the main causes of myelopathy. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most common surgical procedure used to treat cervical myelopathy. Therefore, it is important to study pseudarthrosis rates after ACDF and correlate them with the graft used.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review to evaluate the relationship between pseudarthrosis after ACDF and the interbody graft used.
RESULTS: A total of 3732 patients were evaluated in 46 studies. The mean age of the included patients was 51.5 ± 4.18 years (range, 42-59.6 years). ACDF is most often perforemd as single-level surgery and the level most impaired is C5-C6. The use of titanium cages, zero profile, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2, and carbon cages was seen as a protective factor for pseudarthrosis compared with the autograft group (control group); with an odds ratio of 0.29, 0.51, 0.03, and 0.3, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. The use of polyetheretherketone, poly(methyl methacrylate), and trabecular metal was a risk factor for development of pseudarthrosis compared with the control group, with an odds ratio of 1.7, 8.7, and 6.8, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. Radiologic follow-up was an important factor for the pseudarthrosis rate; paradoxically, a short follow-up (<1 year) had lower rates of pseudarthrosis and follow-up >2 years increased the chance of finding pseudarthrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Different types of grafts lead to a significant difference in pseudarthrosis rates. Follow-up time is also an important factor that affects the rate of pseudarthrosis after ACDF.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Failure and degenerative disc disease; Outcome; Pseudarthrosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31669245     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  3 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Zhonghan Wang; Yang Wang; Zuhao Li; Bo Chao; Shixian Liu; Wangwang Luo; Jianhang Jiao; Minfei Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

2.  Commentary on "Biomaterials in Spinal Implants: A Review".

Authors:  Hans-Joerg Meisel; Neha Agarwal
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-03-31

3.  Autologous Stem Cells in Cervical Spine Fusion.

Authors:  Patrick C Hsieh; Andrew S Chung; Darrel Brodke; Jong-Beom Park; Andrea C Skelly; Erika D Brodt; Ki Chang; Zorica Buser; Hans Joerg Meisel; S Timothy Yoon; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.