C J Popp1, M Butler2, M Curran2, P Illiano2, M A Sevick3, D E St-Jules2. 1. Department of Population Health, New York University, USA. Electronic address: collin.popp@nyulangone.org. 2. Department of Population Health, New York University, USA. 3. Department of Population Health, New York University, USA; Department of Medicine, New York University, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Determining a period of steady state (SS) is recommended when estimating resting energy expenditure (REE) using a metabolic cart. However, this practice may be unnecessarily burdensome and time-consuming in the research setting. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of SS criteria, and compare it to alternative approaches in adults with overweight and obesity. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, ancillary analysis, participants enrolled in a bariatric (study 1; n = 13) and lifestyle (study 2; n = 51) weight loss intervention were included. Indirect calorimetry was performed during baseline measurements using a metabolic cart for 25 min, including a 5-min stabilization period at the start. SS was defined as the first 5-min period with a coefficient of variation (CV) ≤10% for both VO2 and VCO2 (hereafter REE5-SS). Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis in study 2 participants only. REE5-SS was compared against the lowest CV (REECV-lowest), 5-min time intervals (REE6-10, REE11-15, REE16-20, REE21-25), 4-min and 3-min SS intervals (REE4-SS and REE3-SS), and time intervals of 6-15, 6-20 and 6-25 min (REE6-15, REE6-20, and REE6-25) using repeated measures ANOVA and Bland-Altman analysis to test for bias, limits of agreement and accuracy (±6% measured REE). RESULTS: Participants were 54 ± 13 years old, mostly women (75%) and had a BMI of 35 ± 5 kg/m2. Overall, 54/63 (84%) of participants reached REE5-SS, often (47/54, 87%) within the first 10-min (6-15 min). Alternative approaches to estimating REE had a relatively low bias (-16 to 13 kcals), narrow limits of agreement and high accuracy (83-98%) when compared to REE5-SS, in particular, outperforming standard prediction equations (e.g., Mifflin St. Joer). CONCLUSION: Indirect calorimetry measurements that utilize the 5-min SS approach to estimate REE are considered the gold-standard. Under circumstances of non-SS, it appears 4-min and 3-min SS periods, or fixed time intervals of atleast 5 min are accurate and practical alternatives for estimating REE in adults with overweight and obesity. However, future trials should validate alternative methods in similar populations to confirm these findings.
BACKGROUND: Determining a period of steady state (SS) is recommended when estimating resting energy expenditure (REE) using a metabolic cart. However, this practice may be unnecessarily burdensome and time-consuming in the research setting. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of SS criteria, and compare it to alternative approaches in adults with overweight and obesity. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, ancillary analysis, participants enrolled in a bariatric (study 1; n = 13) and lifestyle (study 2; n = 51) weight loss intervention were included. Indirect calorimetry was performed during baseline measurements using a metabolic cart for 25 min, including a 5-min stabilization period at the start. SS was defined as the first 5-min period with a coefficient of variation (CV) ≤10% for both VO2 and VCO2 (hereafter REE5-SS). Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis in study 2 participants only. REE5-SS was compared against the lowest CV (REECV-lowest), 5-min time intervals (REE6-10, REE11-15, REE16-20, REE21-25), 4-min and 3-min SS intervals (REE4-SS and REE3-SS), and time intervals of 6-15, 6-20 and 6-25 min (REE6-15, REE6-20, and REE6-25) using repeated measures ANOVA and Bland-Altman analysis to test for bias, limits of agreement and accuracy (±6% measured REE). RESULTS:Participants were 54 ± 13 years old, mostly women (75%) and had a BMI of 35 ± 5 kg/m2. Overall, 54/63 (84%) of participants reached REE5-SS, often (47/54, 87%) within the first 10-min (6-15 min). Alternative approaches to estimating REE had a relatively low bias (-16 to 13 kcals), narrow limits of agreement and high accuracy (83-98%) when compared to REE5-SS, in particular, outperforming standard prediction equations (e.g., Mifflin St. Joer). CONCLUSION: Indirect calorimetry measurements that utilize the 5-min SS approach to estimate REE are considered the gold-standard. Under circumstances of non-SS, it appears 4-min and 3-min SS periods, or fixed time intervals of atleast 5 min are accurate and practical alternatives for estimating REE in adults with overweight and obesity. However, future trials should validate alternative methods in similar populations to confirm these findings.
Authors: Jacob T Mey; Brittany Matuska; Laura Peterson; Patrick Wyszynski; Michelle Koo; Jacqueline Sharp; Emily Pennington; Stephanie McCarroll; Sarah Micklewright; Peng Zhang; Mark Aronica; Kristin K Hoddy; Catherine M Champagne; Steven B Heymsfield; Suzy A A Comhair; John P Kirwan; Serpil C Erzurum; Anny Mulya Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 6.706