Literature DB >> 31668748

Mesoscale Modeling of Nucleosome-Binding Antibody PL2-6: Mono- versus Bivalent Chromatin Complexes.

Christopher G Myers1, Donald E Olins2, Ada L Olins2, Tamar Schlick3.   

Abstract

Interactions of chromatin with bivalent immunoglobin nucleosome-binding antibodies and their monovalent (papain-derived) antigen-binding fragment analogs are useful probes for examining chromatin conformational states. To help interpret antibody-chromatin interactions and explore how antibodies might compete for interactions with chromatin components, we incorporate coarse-grained PL2-6 antibody modeling into our mesoscale chromatin model. We analyze interactions and fiber structures for the antibody-chromatin complexes in open and condensed chromatin, with and without H1 linker histone (LH). Despite minimal and transient interactions at physiological salt, we capture significant differences in antibody-chromatin complex configurations in open fibers, with more intense interactions between the bivalent antibody and chromatin compared to monovalent antigen-binding fragments. For these open chromatin fiber morphologies, antibody binding to histone tails is increased and compaction is greater for bivalent compared to monovalent and antibody-free systems. Differences between monovalent and bivalent binding result from antibody competition with internal chromatin fiber components (nucleosome core and linker DNA) for histone tail (H3, H4, H2A, H2B) interactions. This antibody competition for tail contacts reduces tail-core and tail-linker interactions and increases tail-antibody interactions. Such internal structural changes in open fibers resemble mechanisms of LH condensation, driven by charge screening and entropy changes. For condensed fibers at physiological salt, the three systems are much more similar overall, but some subtle tail interaction differences can be noted. Adding LH results in less-dramatic changes for all systems, except that the bivalent complex at physiological salt shows cooperative effects between LH and the antibodies in condensing chromatin fibers. Such dynamic interactions that depend on the internal structure and complex-stabilizing interactions within the chromatin fiber have implications for gene regulation and other chromatin complexes such as with LH, remodeling proteins, and small molecular chaperones that bind and modulate chromatin structure.
Copyright © 2019 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31668748      PMCID: PMC7202932          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  45 in total

1.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome.

Authors:  N A Baker; D Sept; S Joseph; M J Holst; J A McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inner workings of gene folding.

Authors:  Michele Di Pierro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A tale of tails: how histone tails mediate chromatin compaction in different salt and linker histone environments.

Authors:  Gaurav Arya; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 a resolution.

Authors:  Curt A Davey; David F Sargent; Karolin Luger; Armin W Maeder; Timothy J Richmond
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Defining the epichromatin epitope.

Authors:  Travis J Gould; Katalin Tóth; Norbert Mücke; Jörg Langowski; Alexandra S Hakusui; Ada L Olins; Donald E Olins
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.197

6.  Mesoscale Modeling Reveals Hierarchical Looping of Chromatin Fibers Near Gene Regulatory Elements.

Authors:  Gavin D Bascom; Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 7.  IgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions.

Authors:  Gestur Vidarsson; Gillian Dekkers; Theo Rispens
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  A new application of the phase-field method for understanding the mechanisms of nuclear architecture reorganization.

Authors:  S Seirin Lee; S Tashiro; A Awazu; R Kobayashi
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 9.  Epichromatin and chromomeres: a 'fuzzy' perspective.

Authors:  Donald E Olins; Ada L Olins
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.411

10.  Sensitive effect of linker histone binding mode and subtype on chromatin condensation.

Authors:  Ognjen Perišić; Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multiscale Genome Organization: Dazzling Subject and Inventive Methods.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.033

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.