Literature DB >> 31668717

Concurrent validity of a wearable IMU for objective assessments of functional movement quality and control of the lumbar spine.

Kristen H E Beange1, Adrian D C Chan2, Shawn M Beaudette3, Ryan B Graham4.   

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are being recognized in clinical and rehabilitation settings for their ability to assess movement-related disorders of the spine for better guidance of treatment-planning and tracking of recovery. This study evaluated the Mbientlab MetaMotionR IMUs, relative to Vicon motion capture equipment in measuring local dynamic stability of the spine (quantified using maximum finite-time Lyapunov exponent; λmax), lumbopelvic coordination (quantified using mean absolute relative phase; MARP), and intersegmental motor variability (quantified using deviation phase; DP) of lumbopelvic segments in 10 participants during 35 cycles of repetitive spine flexion-extension (FE). Intraclass correlations were strong between systems when using both the FE angle time-series and the sum of squares (SS) time-series to measure local dynamic stability (0.807 ≤ICC2,1λmax,FE ≤ 0.919; 0.738 ≤ ICC2,1λmax,SS ≤ 0.868), sagittal-plane lumbopelvic coordination (0.961 ≤ICC2,1MARP ≤ 0.963), and sagittal-plane lumbopelvic variability (0.961 ≤ICC2,1DP ≤ 0.963). It was concluded that the MetaMotionR IMUs can be reliably used for measuring features associated with spine movement quality and motor control during a repetitive FE task. Future work will assess the reliability of sensor placement, performance during multi-directional movements, and ability to discern clinical and healthy populations based on assessment of movement quality and control.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous relative phase; Inertial measurement units; Local dynamic stability; Low back pain; Movement quality

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31668717     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

Review 1.  A vision for the future of wearable sensors in spine care and its challenges: narrative review.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; Wolbert van den Hoorn
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

2.  A Subject-Specific Approach to Detect Fatigue-Related Changes in Spine Motion Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Victor C H Chan; Shawn M Beaudette; Kenneth B Smale; Kristen H E Beange; Ryan B Graham
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit.

Authors:  Mustafa Al-Yassary; Kelly Billiaert; Gregory S Antonarakis; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Validating an inertial measurement unit for cricket fast bowling: a first step in assessing the feasibility of diagnosing back injury risk in cricket fast bowlers during a tele-sport-and-exercise medicine consultation.

Authors:  Keegan Harnett; Brenda Plint; Ka Yan Chan; Benjamin Clark; Kevin Netto; Paul Davey; Sean Müller; Simon Rosalie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Sample Entropy as a Tool to Assess Lumbo-Pelvic Movements in a Clinical Test for Low-Back-Pain Patients.

Authors:  Paul Thiry; Olivier Nocent; Fabien Buisseret; William Bertucci; André Thevenon; Emilie Simoneau-Buessinger
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  Machine Learning Identifies Chronic Low Back Pain Patients from an Instrumented Trunk Bending and Return Test.

Authors:  Paul Thiry; Martin Houry; Laurent Philippe; Olivier Nocent; Fabien Buisseret; Frédéric Dierick; Rim Slama; William Bertucci; André Thévenon; Emilie Simoneau-Buessinger
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Evaluation of natural head position over five minutes: A comparison between an instantaneous and a five-minute analysis with an inertial measurement unit.

Authors:  Mustafa Al-Yassary; Kelly Billiaert; Gregory S Antonarakis; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 8.  Upper Limb Physical Rehabilitation Using Serious Videogames and Motion Capture Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Catherine Alarcón-Aldana; Mauro Callejas-Cuervo; Antonio Padilha Lanari Bo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Measuring the difference in natural head position between the standing and sitting positions using an inertial measurement unit.

Authors:  Kelly Billiaert; Mustafa Al-Yassary; Gregory S Antonarakis; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.558

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.