Sritama Bose1, David R W Hodgson1. 1. Durham University , Department of Chemistry , Lower Mountjoy, Stockton Road , Durham , DH1 3LE , United Kingdom.
Abstract
Aminonucleosides are used as key motifs in medicinal and bioconjugate chemistry; however, existing strategies toward 3'-hypernucleophilic amine systems do not readily deliver deoxyribo-configured products. We report diastereoselective syntheses of deoxyribo- and deoxyxylo-configured 3'-hydroxyamino- and 3'-methoxyamino-nucelosides from 3'-imine intermediates. The presence or absence of the 5'-hydroxyl-group protection dictates facial selectivity via inter- or intramolecular delivery of hydride from BH3 (borane). Protecting group screening gave one access to previously unknown 3'-methoxyamino-deoxyguanosine derivatives.
Aminonucleosides are used as key motifs in medicinal and bioconjugate chemistry; however, existing strategies toward 3'-hypernucleophilic amine systems do not readily deliver deoxyribo-configured products. We report diastereoselective syntheses of deoxyribo- and deoxyxylo-configured 3'-hydroxyamino- and 3'-methoxyamino-nucelosides from 3'-imine intermediates. The presence or absence of the 5'-hydroxyl-group protection dictates facial selectivity via inter- or intramolecular delivery of hydride from BH3 (borane). Protecting group screening gave one access to previously unknown 3'-methoxyamino-deoxyguanosine derivatives.
Amino-functionalized nucleosides
are key fragments for the development of antiviral agents, nucleic
acids technologies, and bioconjugates. While the introduction of aza-functionalities at the 5′-position is relatively
straightforward because of the limited effect of steric hindrance,
3′-functionalization is more challenging. Modified ribo- and deoxyribo-nucleosides with hydroxyamino
and methoxyamino groups at their 3′-positions possess antiviral,
anti-leukemic, and anti-HIV activities.[1] For example, the growth of L1210 cells was shown to be inhibited
by 2′-deoxy-2′-(hydroxyamino) cytidine with an IC50 of 1.84 μM; however, synthesis was achieved indirectly,
via a uridine derivative.[1b] Tronchet et
al.[2] explored the synthesis of 3′-methoxyamino-
and 3′-hydroxyamino-derivatives by stereoselective reduction
of 3′-imines. They readily obtained deoxyxylo-configured systems as major or exclusive products across a range
of reduction conditions. The deoxyribo-isomers, on
the other hand, were usually minor products or absent, where syntheses
have only been achieved via indirect, multistep methods. Richert,
Szostak, and their co-workers have also exploited the nucleophilicity
of amines for chemical primer extension studies; however, they have
not taken advantage of the enhanced nucleophilicities of hypernucleophilic
amines.[3] Thus, we sought to develop a stereoselective
reduction strategy to access deoxyribo-configured
3′-hydroxyamino- and 3′-methoxyamino-nucleoside systems
directly from 3′-imine intermediates.Our initial investigations
centered on thymidine systems because
they do not require nucleobase protection and show reasonable solubility
properties. We chose 5′-O-TBDMS-2,3-dideoxy-3-N-methoxyimino-thymidine 1 as our starting
material, and it was prepared according to reported procedures.[4,2a] Tronchet et al.[2a] reported the use of
NaBH3CN to reduce 1, albeit with low levels
of conversion; thus, we explored the use of Bu3SnH/BF3·Et2O,[5]l-selectride,[6] and NaBH4;[7] however, in all cases, we were unable to obtain
the desired ribo-configured compound 3 (Scheme ), and the xylo-product was formed instead.
Scheme 1
Several Hydride-Transfer
Agents Were Explored and Each Delivered
Deoxyxylo-Configured Product 2 Exclusively
Sebesta et al.[8] and
Matsuda and co-workers[1b] successfully synthesized
2′-(alkoxyamino)uridines
via the intramolecular nucleophilic substitution upon 2,2′-O-anhydrouridine derivatives. Thus, we attempted nucleophilic
substitution at the 3′-position of 2,3′-anhydrothymidine
with methoxylamine under a range of reaction conditions; however,
surprisingly, we only observed a hydrolytic opening of the anhydro-linkage.Stereoselective reduction of 3′-keto nucleosides to ribonucleosides
via intramolecular delivery of hydride, tethered through a free 5′-hydroxyl
group, has been reported.[9] Moreover, Matsuda
and co-workers[1b] reported that 3′-(hydroxyamino)
uridine with a ribo-configuration 5a can be obtained from the corresponding 3′-hydroxyiminouridine 4a by treatment with NaBH4/AcOH (Scheme ). Thus, we attempted the reduction
of imine 4b under similar conditions; however, poor conversion
to 5b was observed (Scheme ). This result aligns with the findings of
Tronchet et al.,[2] who used NaBH3CN upon 1 under acidic conditions to obtain low levels
of the deoxyribomethoxyamino-product 5b as part of a
complex mixture that prevented the isolation of pure material.
Scheme 2
Stereoselective Reduction of Uridine-Based Oxime 4a(1b) Is Observed but Not for the Thymidine Analog 4b
We then explored the application
of the borane–tetrahydrofuran
complex for the reduction of 4b, which we expected to
show higher reactivity and higher levels of conversion. To our delight,
we obtained 3′-methoxyamino-thymidine 5b with
the desired deoxyribo-configuration exclusively in
72% yield (Scheme ). We were also able to reduce protected imine 1 with
BH3·THF to give deoxyxylo-configured
product 2 in a yield of 70%. We sought to confirm the
absolute configurations of the deprotected 3′-methoxyamino-products 5b and 6 by 2D NMR spectroscopy. Unfortunately,
the signals arising from the 3′-H [NCH(OMe)], 4′-H (OCH),
and the 5′-H (OCH2OTBS) protons were overlapping
in the 1H NMR spectra, thus preventing clear assignments
by NOESY correlations. We also attempted similar analyses using the
5′-TBS-protected systems 2 and 3;
however, we encountered the same signal overlap problems. Thus, in
order to increase the chemical shifts of the 5′-H signals and,
to a lesser extent, 4′-H signals, we prepared 5′-tosyl
derivatives 7 and 8. This strategy allowed
us to distinguish and assign each of the proton signals around the
sugar rings. The deoxyribo-isomer 7 did
not show NOESY correlation between the 3′- and the 1′-protons,
whereas correlations were clearly observed for the deoxyxylo-isomer 8. Additionally, in the case of deoxyribo-isomer 7, NOESY signals were observed between the 3′-proton
and thymine nucleobase, along with the expected NOESY correlation
between the 4′- and the 1′-protons. The xylo-isomer 8 also showed the expected 4′–1′
NOESY correlations.
Scheme 3
Stereoselective Syntheses of Deoxyribo- and Deoxyxylo-Configured 3′-Methoxyamino-Thymidines
Arrows on structures 7 and 8 indicate observed NOESY correlations.
Stereoselective Syntheses of Deoxyribo- and Deoxyxylo-Configured 3′-Methoxyamino-Thymidines
Arrows on structures 7 and 8 indicate observed NOESY correlations.In order to gain mechanistic insights into the proposed
intramolecular
hydride delivery via complexation of the boron to the free hydroxyl
group at the 5′-position, we carried out 11B NMR
experiments.[10] The 5′-TBS protected
thymidine imine 1 and deprotected 3′-methoxyimino
thymidine 4b were treated with B(OMe)3 in
THF-d8. Starting with the addition of
0.5 equiv of B(OMe)3, 11B NMR spectra were recorded
for multiple additions of 0.5 equiv of B(OMe)3 up to 2.5
equiv. Figure gives
evidence for B–N complexation via the imine nitrogen of 5′-TBS-protected
3′-methoxyimino-thymidine 1 via a signal at 19.19
ppm, which persists even after overnight incubation with 2.5 equiv
of B(OMe)3. In the case of the 5′-hydroxy 3′-methoxyimino-thymidine 4b, we observed two distinct signals at 22.98 ppm (RO–B–N)
and 19.20 ppm that indicate the complexation of boron with the free
hydroxyl group at the 5′-position and B–N complex, respectively
(Figure ).[11] Taken together, these simple experiments support
the idea of a critical role for 5′-OH complexation in the reduction
of 4b to deliver the deoxyribo-configuration
observed in 5b.
Figure 1
11B NMR studies in THF-d8. (A) 5′-OH imine 4b (1.0 equiv)
mixed with B(OMe)3 (1.5 equiv). (B) 5′-OTBS imine 1 (1.0
equiv) mixed with B(OMe)3 (1.5 equiv). (C) B(OMe)3 alone.
11B NMR studies in THF-d8. (A) 5′-OH imine 4b (1.0 equiv)
mixed with B(OMe)3 (1.5 equiv). (B) 5′-OTBS imine 1 (1.0
equiv) mixed with B(OMe)3 (1.5 equiv). (C) B(OMe)3 alone.On the basis of our promising
results with the thymidine system,
we applied the same strategies to the adenosine and cytidine systems.
Reduction with BH3·THF was successfully performed
on 5′-OH- and 5′-OTBS-3′-methoxyimino-2′,3′-dideoxycytidine
systems[12] to afford deoxyribo-product (9a) and deoxyxylo-product
(9b), respectively, in 71% and 68% yields (Figure ). The 5′-OH-3′-methoxyimino-2′,3′-dideoxyadenosine
system[12] afforded the deoxyribomethoxylamine
product 10 exclusively, which was derivatized at the
5′-position (Figure ) to minimize conformational changes and, thus, confirm configuration
(see the Supporting Information).[14,2b]
Figure 2
Product
scope for deoxycytidine and deoxyadenosine systems.
Product
scope for deoxycytidine and deoxyadenosine systems.We then moved on to explore the application of our BH3·THF reduction strategies toward guanosine systems. Guanosine
systems present significant synthetic challenges because of their
poor solubility properties.[13] With this
in mind, we attempted reductions on the 5′-OTBS-N-isobutyroyl-protected methoxyimino-derivative of deoxyguanosine
and the analogous 5′-OH system[12] using BH3·THF. These reactions resulted in the reduction
of the imines to the desired deoxyxylo-product (11b) and deoxyribo-product (11a) in 85% and 70% yield, respectively, but the isobutyroyl group was
also reduced. Thus, we moved to a N-DMT-protected
substrate, which tolerated BH3·THF to yield the deoxyribo-product 12 after TBS protection,
as its tosic acid salt in 80% yield upon deprotection of the DMT group
(Figure ). The configurations
of the derivatives of all guanosine products were confirmed by NOESY
analysis of the 5′-derivatives (see the Supporting Information).
Figure 3
Deoxyguanosine systems. (A) The protecting
groups of the isobutyroyl-protected
imine substrates were also reduced. (B) DMT-protected imine substrate
afforded the desired deoxyribo-configured methoxyamino-nucleoside
upon DMT deprotection (pTSA = para-toluenesulfonate).
Deoxyguanosine systems. (A) The protecting
groups of the isobutyroyl-protected
imine substrates were also reduced. (B) DMT-protected imine substrate
afforded the desired deoxyribo-configured methoxyamino-nucleoside
upon DMT deprotection (pTSA = para-toluenesulfonate).Next, we explored the
BH3·THF reductions of 3′-hydroxyimino
systems. The unprotected 3′-hydroxyimino-thymidine derivative[4]13a was reduced by BH3·THF stereoselectively to give deoxyribo-configured 14a(15) as the major product alongside
the deoxyxylo-derivative 14b(1c) in a 4:1 ratio, where the mixture could be separated
by column chromatography. On the other hand, the 5′-TBS-protected
3′-hydroxyimino-thymidine derivative 13b(2b) afforded the deoxyxylo-product 15(2b) exclusively. The NMR spectra
of the TBS-protected deoxyribo-derivative 16 and deoxyxylo-isomer 15 matched NMR
data reported by Tronchet et al.[2b] (Scheme ). This strategy
was also successfully applied to deoxycytidine and deoxyadenosine
systems to afford mixtures of deoxyribo- and deoxyxylo-isomers, in ∼4:1 ratios, which could also
be isolated by chromatography. The products were derivatized to 17a, 17b, and 18 to minimize conformational
equilibration[14] and thus allow differentiation
between the deoxyribo- and deoxyxylo-products through NOESY assignments. Bis-TBS-protected
3′-hydroxyamino-cytidine derivative 17a exhibited
NOESY correlations between the 3′-proton and the 6-(nucleobase)-proton,
whereas the debenzoylated-deoxyxylo-derivative 17b exhibited 1′-H to 3′-H NOESY correlation.
Similarly, the TBS-protected-deoxyribo-3′-hydroxyamino-adenosine 18 exhibited NOESY correlations between the protons 3′-
and 8-H of the nucleobase (Figure ).
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Deoxyribo- and Deoxyxylo-Configured 3′-Hydroxyamino Thymidine Derivative
Figure 4
Product scope for deoxycytidine and deoxyadenosine systems.
Product scope for deoxycytidine and deoxyadenosine systems.Kojima et al. demonstrated that 3′-hydroxylamine
systems
can be further reduced to 3′-amines by Pd/C and hydrogen to
afford 3′-amino-ribonucleoside analogs.[16] We applied the same methodology to hydroxylamino-systems 14a and 15, and we were pleased to observe clean
conversion to the corresponding amine systems 19 and 20 in 89% and 75% yield, respectively (Scheme ).
Scheme 5
Synthesis of 3′-Aminonucleoside
Systems via Catalytic Reductions
of Hydroxylamines
In conclusion, we
have developed efficient, direct strategies to
obtain deoxyribo- and deoxyxylo-isomers
of 3′-methoxyamino- and 3′-hydroxyamino-deoxynucleosides,
from common intermediates, via stereoselective reductions of the corresponding
3′-imino deoxynucleosides using BH3·THF. Our
approach has delivered ribo-configured deoxynucleosides
in good yields, which are otherwise difficult to obtain. To the best
of our knowledge, the ribo-deoxycytidine derivative 9a, deoxyadenosine derivative 10, and ribo- and xylo-deoxyguanosine derivatives 11a–c and 12 containing the
3′-methoxyamino-functionality are novel compounds.
Authors: Manuel Röthlingshöfer; Eric Kervio; Tanja Lommel; Ulrich Plutowski; Annette Hochgesand; Clemens Richert Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2008 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Victor S Lelyveld; Derek K O'Flaherty; Lijun Zhou; Enver Cagri Izgu; Jack W Szostak Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: I I Fedorov; E M Kazmina; G V Gurskaya; M V Jasko; V E Zavodnic; J Balzarini; E De Clercq; A Faraj; J P Sommadossi; J L Imbach; G Gosselin Journal: J Med Chem Date: 1997-02-14 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Paul Brear; Gemma R Freeman; Mark C Shankey; Milena Trmcić; David R W Hodgson Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2009-07-06 Impact factor: 6.222