| Literature DB >> 31667586 |
Susumu Take1,2, Motowo Mizuno3, Kuniharu Ishiki2, Chiaki Kusumoto2, Takayuki Imada2, Fumihiro Hamada4, Tomowo Yoshida2, Kenji Yokota5, Toshiharu Mitsuhashi6, Hiroyuki Okada7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori reduces the risk of gastric cancer. In this study, we investigated the risk beyond 10 years after eradication of H. pylori.Entities:
Keywords: Diffuse-type gastric cancer; Eradication therapy; Gastric atrophy; Helicobacter pylori
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31667586 PMCID: PMC7026240 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-019-01639-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gastroenterol ISSN: 0944-1174 Impact factor: 7.527
Patients’ demographic characteristics
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 2193 |
| Female | 544 |
| Age (year) | 53.8 ± 9.1 |
| Smoking | |
| Absence | 1390 |
| Presence | 1347 |
| Drinking | |
| Absence | 1189 |
| Presence | 1548 |
| Ulcer | |
| No ulcer | 538 |
| Duodenal ulcer | 865 |
| Gastric ulcer | 1198 |
| Both | 136 |
| Background mucosal atrophya | |
| Mild | 801 |
| Moderate | 1090 |
| Severe | 846 |
| Duration of follow-up (years) | 7.1 ± 5.4 |
| Eradication therapyb | |
| Dual | 445 |
| Triple | 1962 |
| Metronidazole-based therapy | 330 |
| Absent | 2713 |
| Present | 24 |
aGastric mucosal atrophy was evaluated according to the endoscopic-atrophic-border scale and was classified by grades; mild (C-1 and C-2), moderate (C-3 and O-1), or severe (O-2 and O-3) at eradication therapy as described in the text
bHelicobacter pylori eradication therapy: dual, a proton pump inhibitor together with amoxicillin; triple, a proton pump inhibitor together with amoxicillin and clarithromycin; metronidazole, a proton pump inhibitor together with metronidazole and amoxicillin or clarithromycin
Characteristics of 68 gastric cancers that developed after H. pylori eradication
| Endoscopic featuresa | |
| Superficial depressed (0 − IIc) | 36 |
| Superficial depressed + elevated (0 − IIc + IIa) | 4 |
| Superficial flat type (0 − IIb) | 12 |
| Superficial elevated type (0 − IIa) | 3 |
| Depressed type (0 − III) | 3 |
| Submucosal tumor-like | 2 |
| Borrmann’s classification type 2 | 4 |
| Borrmann’s classification type 3 | 2 |
| Borrmann’s classification type 4 | 2 |
| TNM stages | |
| Stage IA | 58 |
| Stage IB | 2 |
| Stage IIA | 4 |
| Stage IIB | 1 |
| Stage IIIA | 2 |
| Stage IV | 1 |
| Histological type | |
| Intestinal typeb | 43 |
| Diffuse type | 25 |
aEndoscopic features according to classification of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association [22]
bSix fundic gland-type cancers were classified into intestinal-type cancer
Fig. 1Kaplan–Meier analysis of the proportion of patients who remained free of gastric cancer after cure of H. pylori infection. Asterisk: the annual risk of developing gastric cancer calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier analysis of the proportion of patients who remained free of gastric cancer after cure of H. pylori infection according to grade of background gastric mucosal atrophy at the time of eradication therapy (a) and histological type of gastric cancer (b) during the total follow-up period as long as 21 years. Asterisk: the annual risk of developing gastric cancer calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Dagger: statistical significance between curves tested by log-rank test
Fig. 3Kaplan–Meier analysis of the proportion of patients who remained free of gastric cancer after cure of H. pylori infection according to grade of background gastric mucosal atrophy at the time of eradication therapy, histological types of gastric cancer, and follow-up period. Dotted line: Kaplan–Meier curve of patients free of gastric cancer in the first 10 years after cure of H. pylori infection. Line: Kaplan–Meier curve of patients free of gastric cancer in the second decade of follow-up, which was created from the 10 years as starting point
The standardized incidence ratio of gastric cancer in the second decade after H. pylori eradication according to grade of background gastric atrophy at the time of eradication therapy and histological types of gastric cancer
| Milda | Moderate | Severe | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observedb | Expectedc | SIR | 95% CI | Observed | Expected | SIR | 95% CI | Observed | Expected | SIR | 95% CI | |
| Total cancer | 6 | 1.23 | 4.89 | 2.19–10.8 | 6 | 5.40 | 1.11 | 0.50–2.47 | 6 | 7.29 | 0.82 | 0.37–1.83 |
| Intestinald | 2 | 1.71 | 1.17 | 0.29–4.68 | 1 | 6.26 | 0.16 | 0.02–1.13 | 4 | 5.25 | 0.76 | 0.29–2.03 |
| Diffuse | 4 | 0 | ∞ | n/a | 5 | 0.46 | 10.9 | 4.53–26.1 | 2 | 2.12 | 0.94 | 0.24–3.77 |
SIR the standardized incidence ratio of gastric cancer in the second decade of follow-up calculated by dividing the number of observed cases of gastric cancer by that of the expected cases, CI confidence interval, n/a not applicable
aGrade of background gastric mucosal atrophy at the time of H. pylori eradication
bNumbers of gastric cancer cases observed in the second decade of follow-up
cNumbers of expected gastric cancer cases in the second decade of follow-up estimated using the incidence rate ratio of age in the patients during the first decade of follow-up. For age adjustment, we used the incidence rate ratio of age obtained by Poisson regression analysis
dHistological type of gastric cancer; six fundic gland type cancers were classified into intestinal-type cancer
Patients’ demographic characteristics in relation to grade of background gastric mucosal atrophy at eradication therapy
| Total | Gastric mucosal atrophya | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | Moderate | Severe | ||
| Ageb | 53.8 ± 9.1 | 50.6 ± 9.1 | 53.7 ± 8.7 | 57.0 ± 8.5 |
| Genderc | ||||
| M | 2193 | 629 | 844 | 720 |
| F | 544 (19.9%) | 172 (21.5%) | 246 (22.6%) | 126 (14.9%) |
| Drinkingd | ||||
| Absence | 1189 | 348 | 495 | 346 |
| Presence | 1548 (56.6%) | 453 (56.6%) | 595 (54.6%) | 500 (59.1%) |
| Smokingd | ||||
| Absence | 1390 | 410 | 554 | 426 |
| Presence | 1347 (49.2%) | 391 (48.8%) | 536 (49.2%) | 420 (49.6%) |
| Peptic ulcere | ||||
| Absence | 538 | 95 | 200 | 243 |
| Presence | 2199 (80.3%) | 706 (88.1%) | 890 (81.7%) | 603 (71.3%) |
aGastric mucosal atrophy was evaluated according to the endoscopic-atrophic-border scale as described in the text
bIn the linear regression analysis with age as the response variable and gastric mucosal atrophy as the explanatory variable using mild atrophy as a reference, the regression coefficient (95% confidence interval) was 3.11 (2.31–3.90, P < 0.001) in moderate atrophy and 6.43 (95% 5.59–7.28, P < 0.001) in severe atrophy
cFemale gender was less common in patients with severe atrophy than those with mild or moderate atrophy (P < 0.01, Chi-square test, residual analysis)
dSmoking or drinking habit was not significantly different among the patients’ groups
ePeptic ulcer diseases were less common in patients with severe atrophy than those with mild or moderate atrophy (P < 0.01, Chi-square test, residual analysis)