Philipp S Baumann1,2, Ola Söderström3, Lilith Abrahamyan Empson4, Dag Söderström5, Zoe Codeluppi3, Philippe Golay4, Max Birchwood6, Philippe Conus4. 1. Treatment and early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP), Service of General Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Avenue d'Echallens 9, 1004, Lausanne, Switzerland. philipp.baumann@chuv.ch. 2. Center for Psychiatric Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland. philipp.baumann@chuv.ch. 3. Institute of Geography, University of Neuchâtel, Espace Louis-Agassiz, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. 4. Treatment and early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP), Service of General Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Avenue d'Echallens 9, 1004, Lausanne, Switzerland. 5. , Avenue de la Gare 16, 1800, Vevey, Switzerland. 6. Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Urban living is a major risk factor for psychosis. Considering worldwide increasing rates of urbanization, new approaches are needed to enhance patients' wellbeing in cities. Recent data suggest that once psychosis has emerged, patients struggle to adapt to urban milieu and that they lose access to city centers, which contributes to isolation and reduced social contacts. While it is acknowledged that there are promising initiatives to improve mental health in cities, concrete therapeutic strategies to help patients with psychosis to better handle urban stress are lacking. We believe that we should no longer wait to develop and test new therapeutic approaches. METHOD: In this review, we first focus on the role of urban planning, policies, and design, and second on possible novel therapeutic strategies at the individual level. We review how patients with psychosis may experience stress in the urban environment. We then review and describe a set of possible strategies, which could be proposed to patients with the first-episode psychosis. RESULTS: We propose to group these strategies under the umbrella term of 'urban remediation' and discuss how this novel approach could help patients to recover from their first psychotic episode. CONCLUSION: The concepts developed in this paper are speculative and a lot of work remains to be done before it can be usefully proposed to patients. However, considering the high prevalence of social withdrawal and its detrimental impact on the recovery process, we strongly believe that researchers should invest this new domain to help patients regain access to city centers.
PURPOSE: Urban living is a major risk factor for psychosis. Considering worldwide increasing rates of urbanization, new approaches are needed to enhance patients' wellbeing in cities. Recent data suggest that once psychosis has emerged, patients struggle to adapt to urban milieu and that they lose access to city centers, which contributes to isolation and reduced social contacts. While it is acknowledged that there are promising initiatives to improve mental health in cities, concrete therapeutic strategies to help patients with psychosis to better handle urban stress are lacking. We believe that we should no longer wait to develop and test new therapeutic approaches. METHOD: In this review, we first focus on the role of urban planning, policies, and design, and second on possible novel therapeutic strategies at the individual level. We review how patients with psychosis may experience stress in the urban environment. We then review and describe a set of possible strategies, which could be proposed to patients with the first-episode psychosis. RESULTS: We propose to group these strategies under the umbrella term of 'urban remediation' and discuss how this novel approach could help patients to recover from their first psychotic episode. CONCLUSION: The concepts developed in this paper are speculative and a lot of work remains to be done before it can be usefully proposed to patients. However, considering the high prevalence of social withdrawal and its detrimental impact on the recovery process, we strongly believe that researchers should invest this new domain to help patients regain access to city centers.
Authors: Mark Weiser; Jim van Os; Abraham Reichenberg; Jonathan Rabinowitz; Daniella Nahon; Efrat Kravitz; Gad Lubin; Moti Shmushkevitz; Haim Y Knobler; Shlomo Noy; Michael Davidson Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Philippa A Garety; Thomas Ward; Daniel Freeman; David Fowler; Richard Emsley; Graham Dunn; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; Helen Waller; Kathryn Greenwood; Mar Rus-Calafell; Alison McGourty; Amy Hardy Journal: Trials Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Philippe Conus; Lilith Abrahamyan Empson; Zoé Codeluppi; Philipp Sebastien Baumann; Ola Söderström; Dag Söderström; Philippe Golay Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Daniel Freeman; Helen Waller; Ruth Ann Harpur-Lewis; Rosanna Moore; Philippa Garety; Paul Bebbington; Elizabeth Kuipers; Richard Emsley; Graham Dunn; David Fowler; Suzanne Jolley Journal: Behav Cogn Psychother Date: 2013-08-09
Authors: F J Oher; A Demjaha; D Jackson; C Morgan; P Dazzan; K Morgan; J Boydell; G A Doody; R M Murray; R P Bentall; P B Jones; J B Kirkbride Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 10.592
Authors: Charles C Branas; Eugenia South; Michelle C Kondo; Bernadette C Hohl; Philippe Bourgois; Douglas J Wiebe; John M MacDonald Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 11.205