| Literature DB >> 31667386 |
Galina V Portnova1,2, Yulia V Ukraintseva1, Krystsina M Liaukovich1, Olga V Martynova1,3.
Abstract
The neural underpinnings of subjective experience during resting state remain elusive. Dynamic features of EEG oscillations may provide more understanding of the relationship between the content of inner conscious experience and electrical brain activity. We tested a correlation of rating on the Amsterdam Resting-State Questionnaire (ARSQ) with dynamic parameters of EEG recorded in 49 healthy volunteers during the 10-min resting session. The participants filled ARSQ immediately after the rest. We investigated both linear (1 Hz-band power spectral density - PSD) and dynamic features (standard deviation and frequency of Hilbert envelope) of EEG averaged for the whole resting-state segment. Besides, we conducted a procedure of k-mean clustering based on PSD, localization of components retrieved by independent component analysis for 10-sec EEG epochs to assess spectral and temporal variability of EEG. The correlation analysis showed that the increase of PSD and cluster duration of the high-frequency alpha rhythm (12-13 Hz) in central and frontal areas was positively associated with the rating of experienced thoughts related to Planning (r = 0.44). The time of the presence of low amplitude delta oscillations correlated negatively with Planning (r = -0.52). The participants with higher ARSQ scores of Visual Thoughts had a higher standard deviation of the wideband (1-30 Hz) Hilbert envelope. Our data suggest that the dynamic properties of EEG reflect cognitive states assessed by ARSQ.Entities:
Keywords: Amsterdam resting-state questionnaire; Behavioral neuroscience; Cognitive psychology; EEG; Hilbert envelope; K-mean clustering; Neuroscience; Power spectral density; Psychology; Resting state; Signal processing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31667386 PMCID: PMC6812184 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
ARSQ dimension and corresponding items (Diaz et al. 2014).
| Number of factor | Factor | Statements |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Discontinuity of Mind | “I had busy thoughts”, “I had rapidly switching thoughts”, “I had difficulty holding on to my thoughts” |
| 2 | Theory of Mind | “I thought about others”, “I thought about people I like”, “I placed myself in other peoples' shoes” |
| 3 | Self | “I thought about my feelings”, “I thought about my behavior”, “I thought about myself” |
| 4 | Planning | “I thought about things I need to do”, “I thought about solving problems”, “I thought about the future” |
| 5 | Sleepiness | “I felt tired”, “I felt sleepy”, “I had difficulty staying awake” |
| 6 | Comfort | “I felt comfortable”, “I felt relaxed”, “I felt happy” |
| 7 | Somatic Awareness | “I was conscious of my body”, “I thought about my heartbeat”, “I thought about my breathing” |
| 8 | Health Concern | “I felt ill”, “I thought about my health”, “I felt pain”. |
| 9 | Visual Thoughts | “I thought in images”, “I pictured events”, “I pictured places” |
| 10 | Verbal Thoughts | “I thought in words”, “I had silent conversations”, “I imagined talking to myself” |
Mean scores of the evaluated ARSQ domains.
| ARSQ domains | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DoM | ToM | Self | Planning | Sleepiness | Comfort | SA | Health | Visual | Verbal | |
| Mean | 3.03 | 2.65 | 2.16 | 2.46 | 3.16 | 4.20 | 2.63 | 1.22 | 3.30 | 2.22 |
| SD | 0.97 | 0.86 | 0.66 | 1.29 | 0.92 | 0.46 | 1.04 | 0.34 | 1.01 | 0.96 |
Intra-class correlation coefficients and corresponding p values of ARSQ dimensions. Bold and underlined - Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Bold - Correlation is significant at the level p < 0.05 (2-tailed). Underlined numbers denote significant correlations after Bonferroni-Holm correction.
| PCC | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | DoM | ToM | Self | Planning | Sleepiness | Comfort | SA | health | visual | verbal |
| DoM | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.22 | -0.05 | -0.14 | -0.09 | 0.19 | ||
| ToM | 0.06 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.18 | -0.18 | -0.16 | 0.18 | ||
| Self | 0.55 | 0.10 | 0.14 | -0.19 | 0.09 | -0.17 | 0.06 | 0.04 | ||
| Planning | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.32 | -0.03 | 0.26 | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.16 | ||
| Sleepiness | 0.12 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.83 | -0.07 | -0.18 | 0.01 | 0.04 | -0.06 | |
| Comfort | 0.73 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.62 | -0.06 | -0.16 | 0.11 | -0.04 | |
| SA | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.22 | 0.69 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.28 | |
| Health | 0.54 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.69 | 0.97 | 0.28 | 0.13 | -0.04 | 0.11 | |
| Visual | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.66 | 0.27 | 0.78 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.78 | -0.07 | |
| Verbal | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 0.66 | |
Fig. 1Topographical plots showing the strength of Spearman correlation for all channels: A - between Planning of ARSQ and PSD of 12–13 Hz, B –between Visual Thought of ARSQ and HESD of 1.6–30 Hz. Black dots indicate channels with significant correlation (p < 0.05). Scatterplots of EEG patterns and ARSQ scores correspond to the channels marked as white dots.
Fig. 2Resting-state EEG clusters, measured using localization and frequency parameters of power spectral density (PSD). A: C (1–5) topographic maps of peak PSD for five clusters on the head view, B: frequency peak of PSD for each cluster. Colored lines represent five clusters.