Literature DB >> 31667301

The brief data of the relation of living as commuters and quality of life.

Muhammad Fitri Rahmadana1, Gaffar Hafiz Sagala1.   

Abstract

The dataset presented here is useful for identifying the relation of living as commuters and the quality of life. This dataset separates commuters into several groups according to their gender, marital status, educational background, and occupation to enrich the demography data and to give more insight. Data was collected from commuters who work in Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Questionnaire-based survey with proportional random sampling has collected from 384 respondents by accidental sampling. We use statistic descriptive, median-test, Kruskal-Wallis, and spearman-rank correlation to analyze the data. The data shows there is any different response regarding the quality of life between gender, marital status, educational background, and occupation among commuters. The researchers found at least three dominant factors which make the differences, that is the time limitation for social interaction in the neighborhood, time limitation regarding quality interaction as parents, and time limitation for themselves to have quality time. However, the commuters have several reasons why they still survive in the situation. From ten factors proposed, there are only three factors which have significant relation with three dominant factors of commuters life problem which suggested previously. That is 1) Time Compliance with Income; 2) Income per Month, and 3) Fairness Travel Time to Work Location.
© 2019 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commuters; Demography; Preference; Quality of life

Year:  2019        PMID: 31667301      PMCID: PMC6811975          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the Data The data in this article displays a brief exploration regarding commuters preferences toward their quality of life. The dataset describes the gap of preferences between a sample which grouped in gender, marital status, educational background, and occupation. The data provide the fruitful result because the data figured heterogeneous demography background of the sample. The data is valuable for further research regarding quality of life, index of happiness, productivity, and welfare in the region or even as proxies of another area which have similar characteristic. For researchers who interested in public sector development, we present a dataset that is valuable for predicting how commuters define their quality of life and the reason for its definitions. The dataset can be further analyzed in the future using an advanced method of data analysis or even new data format. The figure of data is valuable for the reason of decision-making regarding public transportation investment, traffic regulation, and income regulation to control the index of happiness based on the quality of life.

Data

The data proposed here resulted from surveying commuters who were working in Medan City while they live in another city around Medan. The previous research has shown that commuters life has several impacts on quality of life [1], [2], [3], [4], and demography of the commuters also contribute to resulting the differences of commuters' perspective regarding their quality of life [1], [3], [5], [6]. Therefore, we identify the perception of commuters regarding their quality of life and why they choose those circumstances. Then we separated the data refers to their valuable characteristics, such as gender, marital status, educational background, and occupation for better display of data. Table 1 presents the figure of quality of life regarding the demography of respondents. The author uses the median test and Kruskal-Wallis to identify the difference of responses of each group. It contains the signification number of differences in commuter perception regarding their quality of life according to gender, marital status, educational background, and occupation. The detail of the respondent's demography and its figure of responses are distributed in Table 2, which probable the readers to analyze what factors in demographics which may affect the quality of life among commuters. Furthermore, for advanced analysis, the author used rank-spearman correlation to identified the relationship between quality of life and the antecedents (Table 3). From Table 3, we can indicate there are four aspects which influencing sample to justify their quality of life, that is: work time compliance with income, income per month, ease of transportation mode, fairness travel time to work location.
Table 1

Figure of commuters perception regarding quality of life.

Quality of LifeCommuters
Gender
Marital Status
Educational Background
Occupation
ZSigChi-SquareSigChi-SquareSigChi-SquareSig
Your life will be much better if you work not become a commuters−4.5070.000**2.0920.5532.8270.7272.4480.654
You don't have enough time to do social interaction in your neighborhood−2.9760.003**18.0850.000**15.070.010**31.9260.000**
Your quality as a parent is disturbed because you do not have enough time to interact with your children−2.0580.040*11.7970.008**15.8380.007**31.6960.000**
You don't have time to think about yourself−0.1470.8838.5340.036*15.6120.008**27.040.000**
Your family life is disrupted because you do not have enough time to interact with your partner so that many things cannot be discussed because of this limited time−2.0530.040*6.6870.0839.7700.08224.1780.000**
Your overall life satisfaction as a commuters is reduced because you no longer have much time to channel hobbies and other activities besides routine activities.−1.3340.1824.0130.2604.4660.48410.2040.037*
You feel that you have individuals stress with activities as a commuters−1.6910.0912.4910.4775.0090.41515.3410.004**
Even though your work is within reasonable limits but the time you allocate to travel as a commuters makes you feel overworked−0.1620.8724.8840.1804.5330.4759.8630.043*

Notes: ** Significant at the 0.01 level; * Significant at the 0.05 level.

Table 2

Statistic descriptive.

GenderNMeanSDMarital StatusNMeanSDEducational BackgroundNMeanSDOccupationNMeanSD
Your life will be much better if you work not become a commutersMale2853.4100.776Married2893.4980.804Primary School133.2300.832Civil Servant593.4910.817
Female993.7780.693Single813.4940.615Junior High School443.5460.697Police/Military153.7330.799
Widower340Senior High School2293.5070.776Private Employees1103.5180.798
Widow113.6361.027Diploma243.5410.779Self Employees673.4330.783
Under Graduate723.50.805Others1333.5110.724
Post Graduate240
You don't have enough time to do social interaction in your neighborhoodMale2853.1540.772Married2893.1350.815Primary School132.9230.862Civil Servant592.9150.749
Female993.4440.836Single813.5680.669Junior High School443.0460.569Police/Military152.8670.915
Widower33.3330.577Senior High School2293.3280.801Private Employees1103.4180.806
Widow113.1820.603Diploma243.250.944Self Employees672.9250.804
Under Graduate723.0560.803Others1333.4060.697
Post Graduate240
Your quality as a parent is disturbed because you do not have enough time to interact with your childrenMale2853.1470.879Married2893.1280.939Primary School132.8461.068Civil Servant592.9660.909
Female993.3640.963Single813.4820.743Junior High School443.1360.509Police/Military153.0660.704
Widower33.6671.155Senior High School2293.3010.951Private Employees1103.3090.993
Widow1130.632Diploma243.2920.999Self Employees672.7610.889
Under Graduate722.9440.837Others1333.4590.744
Post Graduate240
You don't have time to think about yourselfMale2853.2210.890Married2893.1730.904Primary School132.6150.506Civil Servant592.9660.870
Female993.2320.818Single813.4320.757Junior High School443.2730.585Police/Military153.21.014
Widower33.6671.155Senior High School2293.3230.927Private Employees1103.3900.929
Widow112.9090.302Diploma243.251.113Self Employees672.8650.736
Under Graduate722.9860.721Others1333.3830.795
Post Graduate230
Your family life is disrupted because you do not have enough time to interact with your partner so that many things cannot be discussed because of this limited timeMale2853.1370.899Married2893.1320.926Primary School132.7690.599Civil Servant593.0160.881
Female993.3430.835Single813.4070.755Junior High School443.0460.776Police/Military152.9330.884
Widower33.6671.155Senior High School2293.2660.895Private Employees1103.3090.864
Widow1130Diploma243.3330.868Self Employees672.8061.019
Under Graduate723.0690.954Others1333.3910.757
Post Graduate230
Your overall life satisfaction as a commuters is reduced because you no longer have much time to channel hobbies and other activities besides routine activities.Male2853.2320.762Married2893.2390.805Primary School133.2310.599Civil Servant5930.643
Female993.3940.831Single813.4190.722Junior High School443.1590.776Police/Military153.3330.488
Widower33.3330.577Senior High School2293.3410.793Private Employees1103.3270.879
Widow113.0910.539Diploma243.1671.007Self Employees673.2390.923
Under Graduate723.1810.699Others1333.3610.678
Post Graduate230
You feel that you have individuals stress with activities as a commutersMale2853.2840.843Married2893.2910.881Primary School133.3850.650Civil Servant592.9660.889
Female993.4640.825Single813.4690.709Junior High School443.250.839Police/Military153.0671.099
Widower33.6671.154Senior High School2293.3890.839Private Employees1103.4360.873
Widow113.2730.467Diploma243.3330.817Self Employees673.3580.811
Under Graduate723.1940.898Others1333.4210.730
Post Graduate230
Even though your work is within reasonable limits but the time you allocate to travel as a commuters makes you feel overworkedMale2853.3560.855Married2893.3490.877Primary School133.0771.115Civil Servant593.0680.828
Female993.4040.727Single813.4570.633Junior High School443.3410.888Police/Military153.5330.834
Widower340Senior High School2293.4020.840Private Employees1103.4640.809
Widow113.0910.539Diploma243.3330.761Self Employees673.3580.949
Under Graduate723.3330.692Others1333.4140.739
Post Graduate240
Table 3

Quality of life among commuters and its antecedents.

Affordability of Housing CostsHouse EligibilityDependency RatioIncome as a Commuters is More BiggerIncome as a commuters is WorthyWork Time Compliance with IncomeIncome per Month (USD)Ease of Transportation ModeComfort Travel to Work LocationsFairness Travel Time to Work Location
Your life will be much better if you work not become a commuters0.000a0.5110.9080.000a0.037b0.2580.3590.001a0.7320.286
You don't have enough time to do social interaction in your neighborhood0.3320.3230.7640.1410.7770.0790.000a0.025b0.4070.035b
Your quality as a parent is disturbed because you do not have enough time to interact with your children0.2890.4090.3390.6910.670.004a0.000a0.1130.8590.046b
You don't have time to think about yourself0.008a0.6280.6290.4640.2870.012b0.006a0.1020.6700.000a
Your family life is disrupted because you do not have enough time to interact with your partner so that many things cannot be discussed because of this limited time0.2120.2600.1740.9250.6470.014b0.000a0.016b0.0570.053
Your overall life satisfaction as a commuters is reduced because you no longer have much time to channel hobbies and other activities besides routine activities.0.2030.3040.9530.2010.0970.0750.7520.0770.1290.090
You feel that you have individuals stress with activities as a commuters0.4470.3300.2170.7420.1000.0510.3320.2960.2650.901
Even though your work is within reasonable limits but the time you allocate to travel as a commuters makes you feel overworked0.1650.2920.5500.6300.9250.002a0.037b0.1080.5210.036a

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Figure of commuters perception regarding quality of life. Notes: ** Significant at the 0.01 level; * Significant at the 0.05 level. Statistic descriptive. Quality of life among commuters and its antecedents. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Experimental design, materials and methods

The commuters in this data are someone who has work location in Medan City while they live in another city around Medan. Medan is the capital city of North Sumatera and the 4th largest city in Indonesia, which has growing industrial clusters. People who work in Medan, mostly, come from another region around Medan because of the high price of the property in Medan. Therefore, to do their job, they need to take daily commuting at least 60–90 minutes to arrive at their workplace. This data distributed the commuters into several groups based on their demography, such as gender, marital status, educational background, and occupation. Researchers try to provide valuable data refer to the explorable value that already exists on the characteristic of the sample. Moreover, we analyze the data from each factor of variables to gain the detail variation of the relationship between variables. The data was collected using 5-Likert-scale questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to the enumerator who spread into 30-entrance way to Medan City from each region around. Enumerator uses proportional random sampling to collect the data and accidental sampling to selecting the sample [7]. From those methods, researchers have obtained 384, which ready to be analyzed. After the dataset was collected, it was tabulated by the primary statistic method, mean and standard deviation, to analyze the descriptive statistics. From the figure of the statistic descriptive, we can predict the pattern and tendencies of data based on the demography of the sample. The descriptive data is observable in Table 2. Furthermore, researchers use a median test to analyze commuters' quality of life according to gender and Kruskal Wallis to analyze commuters' quality of life regarding marital status, educational background, and occupation [8]. In this stage, we exploring the differences of responses among commuters refers to their characteristics by observing z-score and chi-square value to justify the significance of differences (Table 1). In the final stage, we use Spearman's Rank correlation to produce a correlation matrix between commuters' quality of life with its determinant factors, which can be observed in Table 3. Researchers use the methods to identify the relation between variable from each factor from both variables. The correlation data will show a detailed figure of the relationship, which is fruitful for interpretation. To support the accuracy of data analysis and practicality, we use IBM SPSS 22 to examine the dataset [9].

Specifications Table

SubjectEconomics and Econometrics/Geography, Planning and Development.
Specific subject areaDemography of Commuters, Commuters Life, Quality of Life.
Type of dataTable
How data were acquiredThe survey conducted using questionnaire (Appendix 1). The instrument contains descriptive data of respondents and 5-Likert scale questionnaire regarding quality of life. The data was distributed inAppendix 2.
Data formatRaw Data, Descriptive Analysis and Analyzed Statistical Data.
Parameters for data collectionThe sample collected from the population who live as commuters in Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia. Three hundred eighty-four respondents have collected from 30-entrance way to Medan City from each region around. Furthermore, the collected data were tabulated based on gender, marital status, educational background, and occupation to analyze the contrast of phenomenon of quality of life among commuters.
Description of data collectionData was collected using 5-Likert scale questionnaires for quality of life (seeAppendix 3for Validity and Reliability), commuters factors with various scale and individual characteristics with accidental sampling method and proportional random sampling technique. (Appendix 4)
Data source locationMedan, North Sumatra, Indonesia
Data accessibilityData which contained in this article are accesible in Mandeley Data:https://doi.org/10.17632/df6vx9nzzm.3

Value of the Data

The data in this article displays a brief exploration regarding commuters preferences toward their quality of life.

The dataset describes the gap of preferences between a sample which grouped in gender, marital status, educational background, and occupation.

The data provide the fruitful result because the data figured heterogeneous demography background of the sample.

The data is valuable for further research regarding quality of life, index of happiness, productivity, and welfare in the region or even as proxies of another area which have similar characteristic.

For researchers who interested in public sector development, we present a dataset that is valuable for predicting how commuters define their quality of life and the reason for its definitions.

The dataset can be further analyzed in the future using an advanced method of data analysis or even new data format.

The figure of data is valuable for the reason of decision-making regarding public transportation investment, traffic regulation, and income regulation to control the index of happiness based on the quality of life.

  1 in total

1.  Correcting bias in self-rated quality of life: an application of anchoring vignettes and ordinal regression models to better understand QoL differences across commuting modes.

Authors:  Melanie Crane; Chris Rissel; Stephen Greaves; Klaus Gebel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.